@RogueWPA@CheeseForEvery1 But the law recognizes differences in the personhood as well. Most obviously, corporate “persons” cannot vote (yet!). So limiting corporate political donations does not necessarily threaten the general principle of corporate personhood.
@markmcneilly As I think you know, Mark, I generally agree. But the question was about how to measure it, not just whether it feels that way. And my point is that what actually matters is the breath of Ideas considered, not the identifications of the faculty.
Important points! Root cause is that there is no clear bounds on “faculty” and no theoretically defensible measure of individual ideology. Best it can be is a proxy for the universe of ideas considered and debated on campus which is the right concept to care about.
There is no such thing as a perfect measure of faculty ideology.
Surveys: low response rates, social desirability
Twitter follows (i.e. Barberá 2015): many academics have left the platform
Donations: many faculty don't donate
So any measure needs to come with, at minimum, very serious caveats.
@ASAnews If you’d like to sign on to the statement, visit https://t.co/ukLa2D5jni .
The current full list of signatories can be found at https://t.co/CPBpgBBS12 .
@JukkaSavo@ashleytrubin should not make its operational decisions based on the political beliefs of a fraction of the membership, bypassing the fiduciary role of the elected leadership. You don’t need to buy into a separate class of “scientific sociologists” to agree with that point. [2/2]
@JukkaSavo@ashleytrubin Thanks for the shout out but for the record I would not endorse the distinction you’ve drawn. I think sociology and activism have long been connected and have no problem w sociologists connecting their work with social change. I think the professional society of sociologists [1/]
Tell me more about how politicians' recent attacks on sociology are to blame for the declining enrollments that go back [checks notes] more than a decade.
As a candidate for office in the American Sociological Association, I've been asked to provide a statement on a proposed academic boycott of Israel. Here it is:
Academic boycott of Israel and the American Sociological Association https://t.co/MRtZnDJAZd via @davidsmeyer1
@williamjurayj@jhuclsp Really interesting. Question: it seems odd to take a deterministic question (how much did I make, how much do I owe), introduce probabilistic/uncertain reasoning, and prefer deterministic results. Why does LLM outperform a well designed deterministic algorithm for this?
@coreyrpayne@Soc4Pal “ethical” often stands in for a claim to power in the association; there is legitimate heterogeneity among the membership on many political questions, so I think it’s right for the association to be reticent to adopt a political position advanced by only a portion of its members