Dear the @BBC
Your biggest problem isn’t a lack of funding. It’s the assumption that funding should be compulsory.
If you truly provide a genuinely valuable service, you should be able to make the case for people to support you voluntarily.
Extending the licence fee to cover Netflix, YouTube and Amazon would surely be an admission that the current model cannot compete on its own merits.
Why should the British people who have deliberately chosen not to watch traditional TV be forced to subsidise an organisation they don’t use?
Public service broadcasting has a place, but that doesn’t give any organisation an automatic right to take money from the public.
Earn the audience. Earn the funding. Don’t legislate your way out of irrelevance.
Sink or swim on your own merits.
#BBC @Independent
A Ukrainian military officer is on trial in Germany for the terrorist attack on the Nord-stream pipeline. This attack had the gravest environmental, energy and economic consequences. His defence is that he was only obeying orders from his government. Your intelligence services and their media lied to you that Russia itself committed this crime. Who will be held accountable for this?
And in the blink of an eye, the government have gone from “we need to reduce the carbon footprint to save the planet" to "we will build mega AI data centres that massively deplete energy and water supplies”.
BBC licence fee to be extended to YouTube, Netflix & Amazon.
This is completely unacceptable.
Those of us who have decided not to watch terrestrial TV should not be forced to pay for and prop up an outdated system.
Let the BBC sink or swim on its own.
https://t.co/ybqx0IS4Gk
Mick Lynch wants a progressive wealth tax, which is a Green Party Policy, with the richest paying the same as everyone else on PAYE, 47%.
That would bring in hundred of billions, it is time for the richest to pay what everyone else has been paying their whole lives.
The Tories have called for a 5 year freeze on the Minimum Wage to 'fix unemployment'.
Corporate profits in the UK are £680bn a year, enough to employ 25.1m people on the Minimum Wage full time, including NI payments.
There are only 1.8m unemployed people.
IMPORTANT
THIS MESSAGE FROM MIKE YEADON WAS MEANT TO BE HEARD IN LONDON ON 13th DECEMBER AT THE MASS NON COMPLIANCE PROTEST AGAINST DIGITAL ID.
A TECH FAILURE MEANT THE VIDEO DID NOT PLAY ON THE SCREEN.
THAT FAILURE WILL NOT SILENCE THE MESSAGE.
THESE WORDS WERE MEANT TO BE HERD
Thames Water is due to run out of money (again) over the next few weeks. A year and a half ago it was given a £3 billion bailout now it's asking for another £2.4 billion.
We really are being taken for mugs.
https://t.co/0mslymRhZX
Royal Mail has been told that it could save £650m by only delivering things 3 days a week.
Did you know that the taxpayer could save £4,000m a year if Royal Mail had never been privatised, or if it was renationalised, and deliver 5 days a week.
I'd go with that.
Someone Wanted Me To Expose Piers Morgan:
Let's 1st Understand One Thing
You need to understand what Piers Morgan actually is before you understand what he does. He is not a journalist. He is not an interviewer. He is not even a personality in the way the public understands personality. He is a placement agent for narrative laundering. His entire career is a single assignment: to sit in the most visible chair available and cleanse dirty assets with the appearance of scrutiny.
So What Exactly Is His Function?
His tactic is simple, and it works because the audience has been trained to mistake volume for courage. He screams at people. He interrupts. He postures as the indefatigable truth-seeker who asks the "tough questions." But the spectacle is a magic trick. The real questions never get asked. The screaming is the cover for the script. The confrontation is the alibi.
Nobody gets grilled on a Piers Morgan show unless the grilling serves the network's interests. And when a protected asset like Zelenskyy sits down, the "tough questions" are written by the same people who wrote Zelenskyy's talking points.
Why?
Because Piers Morgan has been a controlled asset for decades. His career is a latticework of editor positions at major tabloids, television networks, and media properties, each one owned by the exact financial class he claims to oppose. You do not get handed the editorship of an international tabloid at 29 years old because of talent alone. You get it because you are known to be dependable. You will run the stories you are told to run. You will kill the stories you are told to kill. And you will do it with such performative bluster that nobody notices the pattern.
Morgan's recent defense of Zelenskyy is not an act of conscience. It is a scheduled perception operation, executed with all the subtlety of a knee on a neck. The rollout is coordinated interviews highlighting Zelenskyy's "feelings of betrayal," his "emotional pain" over American politics, his "lonely fight against corruption." None of it is journalism. It's an image reconstruction campaign.
Here's The Tell:
The framework is always emotional, never forensic. A real interviewer following the money would ask about the DTRA documents. About the biolab records. About the former Ukrainian prosecutor who was fired for investigating corruption in the energy sector. About the cargo manifests moving through Odesa. About the offshore accounts and shell companies linked to the political class in Kyiv. About the disappearance of billions in Western "aid" into private hands.
A real journalist would ask about the adrenochrome logistics, the trafficking corridors, the organ brokerage networks that moved through Ukrainian territory for years.
Piers Morgan asks none of it. Instead, he asks about feelings. He asks about betrayal. He lets Zelenskyy weep on camera or perform the appearance of it because emotional theater is the smoke screen. The audience responds to the crying, not the cargo.
The performative vulnerability distracts from the forensic reality. And Piers knows exactly what he's doing. He has spent thirty years learning which emotional buttons to push to keep a conversation from ever becoming dangerous.
What did the London media do during the Epstein disclosures?
They ran the American imports and added nothing. Zero investigative energy on the British side of the network. Zero follow-up on the London banking. Zero on the properties, the tax structures, the charity fronts, the art transactions. The British press Morgan's press treated Epstein as a foreign story that happened to have a British prince attached. That omission is not an accident. It's an editorial decision made by people who knew the trail would lead home.
Morgan's silence on the British side of the Epstein network is louder than any interruption he's ever performed on camera. He knows where the bodies are buried metaphorically, and in at least one case, with a specificity that would make the hair on your neck stand up. The London blackmail economy was built on exactly this kind of shared knowledge: everyone holds everyone's video, so nobody talks.
We will dig more into him later.
@piersmorgan
WELL DID ANYONE KNOW ABOUT THIS???......
Bill Gates , Pfizer's CEO and Mark Rutte are in a Dutch courtroom Thursday over COVID vaccine injuries .
Two of the richest men and nothing been reported in mainstream world news?
Two plaintiffs are dead . Gates tried to claim the Dutch court had no power over him .
They laughed !
MSN wont touch this why?
The hearing is Thursday 22nd October at 12.30pm live streamed from Leeuwarden .
The world should be watching this to see the outcome because alot of people have died or have been left with serious disabilities due to him and his company !
🚨BREAKING
Andy Burnham has just announced that he will repeal Margaret Thatcher’s ideological ban on public ownership of water companies. This is good news, and a sign of just how intensely this government is feeling the pressure from the public.
But this means absolutely nothing if he does not then bring water into public ownership.
Instead, Burnham’s speech doubled down on regulation as a way to fix the crisis in our water system.
This is doomed to fail. When water companies are fined, they pass them on to us. When bonuses are banned, they call them something else.
Burnham has an open goal with Thames Water. The company is insolvent. And the only option to keep it privatised is to hand it over to US hedge funds. Yet Burnham has failed to take them on today.
Andy Burnham must take Thames Water into special administration and keep it in permanent public ownership. And he can use legislation to make it easier to bring other water companies into public hands when they continue to fail to deliver.
It is time for a water system that truly works for us. Public ownership of water now. Nothing less will do.
Now the truth finally comes out that the state of New York wants the Amish people‘s properties and land so they can build their data centers. How disgusting 🤮
 The Amish of Central New York told the seditious Governor Kathy Hochul they would pack up, abandon their farms and leave if the Governor tried forcing vaccines on their children. The Governor fined them over $100,000 and demanded they comply anyway.
When the Amish decided to fight back, taking the wicked Governor to court, Hochul's minion Senator Fahy drew up even more legislation to pressure them to leave, attacking their children again, this time through an anti-homeschooling bill.
Tens of thousands of acres of cleared Amish farmland are at stake. The Amish have spent decades clearing their land by hand and horse. The hard work has been done.
But if the Governor has her way, the Amish will be forced to sell that cleared land to the solar farms and data centers knocking on the doors for it.
Who will help the Amish stand up to this maniacal Governor? We need to expose this on social media and we need to get the right people involved to represent the Amish and help them fight This evil demonic power and control of New York.