@Lord_Twatsomby@carolvorders@CrewkerneGaz@HMRCgovuk Thanks for sharing, the team at the Gazette suggest that this was as a result of Facebook moderation rather than action by Jeremy Clarkson himself. Do you know if they have ever taken anything down voluntarily?
https://t.co/ZjP7g7vD16
@Lord_Twatsomby@carolvorders@CrewkerneGaz@HMRCgovuk Perhaps these people all subscribe to the theory that all news is good news. Politicians of all shades who are skillful at generating self-publicity often make use of these skills to build their careers.
@Lord_Twatsomby@carolvorders@CrewkerneGaz@HMRCgovuk It would appear that she feels that it is derogatory but the Gazette disagrees. It's interesting that in other circumstances the Gazette has agreed to take stuff down, what were these circumstances?
@Lord_Twatsomby@carolvorders@CrewkerneGaz@HMRCgovuk Choosing a mode of expression that has such a strong risk of hurting the feelings of others was unfortunate. It's sad that when the feelings of others are hurt by this, they just don't seem to care.
@Lord_Twatsomby@carolvorders@CrewkerneGaz@HMRCgovuk You don't seem to have any respect for @carolvorders after condoning the use of her image you now also choose to negatively characterise her by misspelling her name. You also seem to have something against the EU, is @carolvorders pro EU stance behind your actions?
@Lord_Twatsomby@carolvorders@CrewkerneGaz@HMRCgovuk This is an issue in the UK so what would happen if we were a member of the European Union isn't relevant. The second flag in my profile is that of the Council of Europe of which the United Kingdom is a founder member. This flag has subsequently been adopted by the EU.
@Lord_Twatsomby@carolvorders@CrewkerneGaz@HMRCgovuk We are all entitled to share our opinion, however in this context the opinion of those who are directly affected by any loss of income including @carolvorders must surely take precedence over those who are merely commenting from outside.
@Lord_Twatsomby@carolvorders@CrewkerneGaz@HMRCgovuk I fully understand that in the eye of @HMRCgovuk, if the entire turnover is only a couple of quid a year then this isn't commercial, even £999 isn't commercial. Any more than this they are just as much of a commercial entity as a film studio, the only difference is scale.
@Lord_Twatsomby@carolvorders@CrewkerneGaz@HMRCgovuk@HMRCgovuk is concerned with income. The cost of the tools may affect the amount of tax due but not whether it regards the Crewkerne Gazette as a commercial entity. A modest level of subscription through Buymeacoffee will make them a commercial entity. https://t.co/AoSJisVpMH
@Lord_Twatsomby@carolvorders@CrewkerneGaz They may not be a film studio but they are still benefiting financially for their work. If this is more than £1000/yr then @HMRCgovuk will regard them as a commercial entity.
https://t.co/kvGlf5hAP5
@Lord_Twatsomby@carolvorders@CrewkerneGaz Obviously an entire film would be a serious infringement of the rights of the actor which should be protected. Accepting this logic means that the question then becomes one of degree. What makes the film an infringement & short form satirical content perfectly OK?
@Lord_Twatsomby@carolvorders@CrewkerneGaz If a performers likeness can be used without being licensed then this will mean that an AI generated versions of the performer could be used instead of the performer themselves, this would seriously impact the creative arts. Equity has already been campaigning around this issue.
@Lord_Twatsomby@carolvorders@CrewkerneGaz The Unfair Trading Regulation already provides protection against passing off. I don't have a ban in my head but the Lords committee report I linked to does include the concerns around generative AI and the rights of performers.
https://t.co/s5ehZaUIcV
@Lord_Twatsomby@carolvorders@CrewkerneGaz This would apply to unauthorised digital replicas and would therefore extend individuals protection beyond content that existing regulation regards as 'harmful'. Any work which included the persona of an individual such as the Crewekerne Gazette would require their consent.
@Lord_Twatsomby@carolvorders@CrewkerneGaz The House of Lords Communications and Digital Committee’s report, 'AI, copyright and the creative industries' report recommended the introduction of an enforceable mechanism to give creators control over the commercial exploitation of their identity.
https://t.co/w7OYSKQE0Q.
@Lord_Twatsomby@carolvorders@CrewkerneGaz Yes, exactly I would like to appreciate the perspective of those who assume that free expression permits Al satirical sketch videos using public figures. The legal opinion provides plenty of support for the contrary opinion, so any sources supporting this perspective are welcome.
@Lord_Twatsomby@carolvorders@CrewkerneGaz I'm aware that the rights of an individual to free speech can outweigh data protection rights. However none of the sources of legal opinion I've found support the law falling on this side for AI generated satire. Please share anything that supports this side of the argument.