@carltonmitch101@The_PrenderCast@hell4u02 It’s not hard when you sitting in the arc. Must have been smoko break. Probably thought game over so they weee packing the equipment up
@Bmwils11@The_PrenderCast That’s wrong. Imagine the ball went through for a goal then they paid a free for deliberate behind rushed, of course they can overturn it. That’s what the review is for.
@Alphabreeding@matttassie He didn’t steal it like you say walk into a tab. He won it on a race they left open. Maybe he didn’t realise it was finished and got lucky with the first four. There is no proof he knew the result. Maybe his a good punter and got a first four. In end no evidence against.
@Alphabreeding@matttassie 🥳 he won it on a first four, it was then found race was finished. money should be taken back I agree. But other bets were legal bets. He could’ve just placed the money in the account if he didn’t have any in there. It’s the books fault should have taken money back sooner.
@abcsport It’s the Gold Coast player who makes contact with the umpire. Bigger question is why was the umpire putting himself in danger? His an umpire not a mediator.
@Alphabreeding@matttassie He did basically have a free crack cause if he lost the 4K he’s account would be in minus and then he would owe the bookmaker. In the end it’s on the bookie to void bets if they are in correct. Not do it the next day
@Alphabreeding@matttassie Ain’t his problem don’t have employees. Surely you have to have employees operating if you want to trade. That’s the books fault. bets he placed after the first four were valid bets placed before the race so they are winners. Ruling is correct, you can’t void winning bets.
@Alphabreeding@matttassie There’s no proof he wouldn’t have placed those bets otherwise. He could have deposited the money to place the bets. Why did it take them all night to cancel the first bet is the real question