Andronikus

I love 3 things in life: people, business and economy.

[Andronikus @Androkius]

@ikarusz26 $POLY will scam even harder

[Andronikus @Androkius]

@willo2_Poly @Polymarket They scammed me aswell. They scammed many users. Shame on you Polymarket. Shame on the Uma protocols. A market of 400milipn can not be managed by a shitcoin with 40M marketcap

[Andronikus @Androkius]

@JeffreyDReed Of course I do!

[Andronikus @Androkius]

@mannydhill44548 @Polymarket I also get scammed for 2k$ my friend. I hope they will do the right thing.

[Andronikus @Androkius]

@avi_eisen I bet u r from India

[Andronikus @Androkius]

@Nik_Poly Polymarket scammed the users and u are a scammer like them. fu

[Andronikus @Androkius]

@PositionsFi It should be YES. POLYMARKET SCAMMED THE OWN USERS AND ALTERATE THE REALITY. Just stfu man

[Andronikus @Androkius]

@0x_exit Polymarket scammed me aswell for 2k

[Andronikus @Androkius]

@arkham Polymarket scammed everyone few hours ago. That it is not fair, at all.

[Andronikus @Androkius]

@glxyresearch So in the end polyscam scammed u aswell?

[Andronikus @Androkius]

@farazktwt Yes bro. Buy some yes and enjoy the ride. Do not sleep

[BugsBunnymoar @bugsbunnymoar]

FOR THIS SITUATION

The fair resolution should be YES.

The market question is not “ https://t.co/4FiwoHleSo ” The question is whether MicroStrategy sells any Bitcoin by May 31, 2026, 11 :59 PM ET.

Strategy’s own filing confirmed that it sold 32 BTC between May 26 and May 31, 2026. That means the sale occurred inside the market’s timeframe. The fact that the filing became public on June 1 does not change the actual event date.
⚠️⚠️
If Polymarket wanted this market to require confirmation before the deadline, the rule needed to say that clearly. It did not. The rule says “sells,” not “announces,” “discloses,” or “is confirmed before the deadline.”

⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️
There is also precedent. In the Khamenei “out as Supreme Leader by March 31” market, the resolution depended on whether the event occurred within the market timeframe, not simply whether every piece of confirmation was available before the deadline.

That market went through disputes and still finalized YES.

⚠️⚠️⚠️
Applying a different standard here creates an unfair double standard. A later disclosure can still prove that the underlying event happened before the deadline.

⚠️⚠️⚠️
Otherwise, Polymarket is changing the question after the fact from “Did the event happen?” to “Was the event confirmed before the deadline?”

The evidence is clear: Strategy sold Bitcoin between May 26 and May 31. Therefore, under the plain wording of the market, the correct outcome is YES.

[13 (very eepy) @131pepe69]

We scammed our users.

Here’s how:

[Rodney @cryptojourneyrs]

Polymarket caught is 4K 📷 lmao

Pay @willo2_Poly his damn $500,000

@Polymarket @PolymarketMoney

[0xDinosaur @0xDinoCrypto]

I have now sent the Polymarket evidence brief by email to:

@CoinDesk
@dlnews
@CryptoSlate
@FT
@washingtonpost

If you care about fair markets, please like, repost, and comment so more people can see this.

If any journalist, editor, crypto researcher, legal analyst, or media friend is willing to review the evidence and write about this publicly, I would be deeply grateful.

This should not fade away quietly.

Too many users trusted the written rules. Too many people are now being ignored.

We have to keep pushing.

We have to fight this to the end.

Rule before trade.

[Sweep @0xSweep]

If Polymarket is forced to reverse this decision, these holders would receive over $40.6 MILLION collectively

[Bounce @bounceidc]

why i think MicroStrategy sells any Bitcoin by May 31 should resolve YES.

if the market hasn't resolved yet i believe the fair outcome is YES.

anyone who actively uses prediction markets knows that many markets have a delay of several days to confirm information about an event after the deadline. that's just how it works.

what raises more questions is the new rule that appeared after the fact: confirmation achieved outside of the market's time frame does not qualify.

in my opinion the fair resolution is YES and polymarket should acknowledge the mistake. the alternative legitimizes adding rules after the market outcome. that destroys trust.

YES went from 0.1 to 1.2 in the last few hours. that's a 12x.

[Fozzy @fozzydiablo]

I think im done with polymarket forever if this doesnt resolve to YES