Can someone please explain it to me like I'm five, why members of Congress are more upset that Elon became a trillionaire than they are that Somalis have defrauded our government out of hundreds of billions of dollars?
The American flag represents freedom, liberty, justice, and the will of a nation to become something greater for 250 years and counting.
On this Flag Day, stand in unity with our homeland, honor our fallen heroes, and salute the greatest mark of freedom anywhere in the world.🇺🇸
America is lucky to have a leader with such incredible courage, remarkable strength, an unmatched sense of humor, and an unparalleled love of country.
Happy Birthday, Mr. President!
Again, you may not like the UFC thing at the White House, but the moment you hung a giant pride flag from the columns and had half-naked “trans” activists exposing themselves on the lawn, you lost all right to complain about desecration.
Elon Musk earns a trillion dollars, the Left has a meltdown,
The government steals half your paycheck for trillions of dollars a year, the Left cheers.
35 years just doesn’t seem like enough.
He robbed far more than 35 years from Austin Metcalf and his family.
His mother won’t get to see him get married, won’t get to meet the family he would have created someday.
His brother’s children will never know their uncle.
He would have likely lived another sixty to seventy years easily…
How many kids were robbed from the Metcalf family?
And people are donating to his murderer?
It’s insanity.
It’s immoral.
And sadly, it’s reality.
There are evil people out there. People that will back a murderer simply because of the color of his skin…
How are we to get past this? How can we coexist with people like this?
The reason ID is banned in California (and New York) elections is to enable large-scale fraud.
When you combine no ID and mail-in voting, fraud is de facto legalized.
The E. Jean Carroll case against President Trump is one of the strangest civil cases in American history. The foundational problem is this: Carroll could not identify when the alleged incident occurred — not even the year with any precision.
That should have killed the case as dead as a skunk on the road right there.
Without a temporal anchor, no defendant — regardless of guilt or innocence — can mount an alibi defense. Trump, who has maintained detailed calendars and staff records for decades, was denied the most basic tool of self-defense: the ability to establish where he was. That is not a technicality. It is a due process violation at the constitutional level.
Then Carroll produced the one piece of physical evidence she claimed corroborated her account — the dress she wore during the alleged incident. It was subsequently established that the dress was designed after the incident could have occurred. The sole corroborating evidence falsified her timeline.
The case proceeded anyway.
The resulting verdict was then weaponized in a defamation suit — where Trump was held liable for denying the allegation, while being procedurally barred from defending against it, because it was already "proven" in another court, regardless how flawed the procedure was. He was punished, in effect, for asserting his own innocence.
Compounding everything: coordinated professional and physical threats so thoroughly intimidated the legal community that attorneys refused these cases regardless of available fees. When you systematically destroy a defendant's ability to retain counsel of choice, you forfeit the right to a legitimate verdict.
An allegation is not evidence. Process without substance is not law. And a verdict produced under these conditions carries no legitimate authority — whatever its formal status.
Not only is it the right move to investigate Carroll, but every other person involved as well. Trump is owed serious damages here, and there may be a few people who belong in prison for their roles in the case.
@SusannaTyler20@IndianaGPA@SusannaTyler20 Nah, that woman is solely responsible for putting anyone in danger. The way these troopers handled this incident, which was quite well, is a direct result of how this state (CT) treats LEOs who lawfully do their job but get fired/charged anyway.
@ScoutBB2020@SusannaTyler20@IndianaGPA …especially in very liberal states like CT. They’re likely to be fired and/or charged for simply doing their jobs as trained.
I don’t care what anyone says about Tulsi Gabbard, but she is the only person in all of Washington who had the ovaries to directly call out Barack Obama and lay out, point by point, the grand scheme behind the Russia hoax. For that alone, I will always be one of her biggest fans.