Andy Garside

West Yorkshire

[Andy Garside @AndyGarside5]

@andyburnham You’ve NO MANDATE whatsoever for this , none whatsoever. 😡

[Andy Garside @AndyGarside5]

@piersmorgan Aged well that tweet !!

[Andy Garside @AndyGarside5]

@linadreaamy 7x14

[Andy Garside @AndyGarside5]

@linadreaamy 98

[Andy Garside @AndyGarside5]

@piersmorgan Aged well that piers !! 😂

[Andy Garside @AndyGarside5]

@Keir_Starmer You know fuck all about ⚽️ too 😂

W ⚓️

[Wide Awake Media @wideawake_media]

Let's clear something up.

The societal decay you're watching unfold before your eyes—via mass migration, two-tiered justice, Net Zero policies, extortionate costs of living, etc—is not "failure" or "incompetence".

It's the deliberate controlled demolition of Western civilisation.

Did you really think it was one massive "coincidence" that every single Western nation is being destroyed in the exact same way, at the exact same time, by the exact same policies?

[Andy Garside @AndyGarside5]

@SandyofSuffolk Renaaker!!!!

[Claire Adams @claire_adams694]

His voice broke when he spoke about his own children.

Never for ours!

Good riddance!!!!

[Andy Garside @AndyGarside5]

Enjoy the “glow” throughout today as Starmer leaves office (I will too 😂)

But

Burnham will be even worse , bookmark this !

[𝐍𝐢𝐨𝐡 𝐁𝐞𝐫𝐠 🇮🇷 ✡︎ @NiohBerg]

He cried for himself.

Not for Southport.

Or Southampton.

Or Belfast.

Or the rape gang victims.

Or all the other victims of policies he chose to continue or worsen.

Keir only decided to show a human emotion when he finally took the hint and resigned.

Narcissist.

[Andy Garside @AndyGarside5]

@SamCKx Get me a bag of whatever you’re taking 😂

[Dr Philip Kiszely @KiszelyPhilip]

Gone.

Thank God.

But if you think things won’t be exponentially worse under Burnham, you’re certifiable.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Starmer resigns - he has been a truly disgraceful Prime Minister.

I do not believe him to be a good man or a patriot.

He has deliberately and rapidly accelerated the destruction of our Britain, of our home.

History will not remember him kindly, nor should it.

I sat in Parliament, looking him in the eye, listening to him attempting to justify his decision to block a national inquiry into the mass rape of young British girls.

I will never forgive him. For that, and so much else.

What comes next, I do not know.

Whatever that is, Restore Britain will be ready to offer the British people a democratic route out - a better way, the only way.

But Starmer is gone.

And that is a good thing.

Enjoy it.

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

The BBC Fabricated Trump's Words. Starmer Wants It Boosted For Fighting Disinformation.

This week, the same government that announced it would ban under-16s from most social media platforms confirmed a second policy. Force Facebook, YouTube and every major platform to algorithmically boost content from the BBC, ITV and Channel 4. The stated reason is fighting disinformation. The timing makes that justification impossible to take at face value.

The BBC spliced together two separate parts of a Donald Trump speech, delivered an hour apart, to make it appear he had directly told his supporters to march on the Capitol and fight, while cutting the part where he told them to protest peacefully. This was not sloppy editing. It was a constructed sequence designed to produce a false impression of what was said. Trump is now suing the BBC for ten billion dollars. The corporation's own internal memo, leaked to the Telegraph last autumn, documented the edit alongside a pattern of other failures. Extensive uncritical airtime given to Hamas on BBC Arabic. A rogue unit of activist reporters censoring coverage of the trans debate to fit a predetermined narrative. A report calling car insurers racist that was found to be, in the BBC's own words, thoroughly wrong. This week it emerged the corporation sacked a presenter for criticising its Gaza coverage while taking no action against reporters who appeared to celebrate the October 7th attacks.

This is the organisation that Starmer wants boosted in the name of trusted information. Not a minor broadcaster with an isolated error. An institution funded by £3.7 billion a year in compulsory licence fees, facing a billion dollar lawsuit for fabricating a world leader's words, accused of one sided reporting on the most contested conflicts of our time, and now positioned by law to be placed ahead of every independent voice on every major platform in the country.

Put this alongside the under-16s ban and the pattern stops looking like coincidence. One policy restricts what young people can access. The other restructures what everyone sees first, adults included, engineering visibility in favour of the state broadcaster and against the independent platforms where this government's record, on Belfast, on Makerfield, on the asylum backlog and on every other documented failure, gets challenged daily by people it cannot easily silence. Bluesky escaped the social media ban despite its own documented child safety failures. The BBC gets promoted despite a documented record of fabrication. Both decisions share the same logic. Visibility for institutions the government finds comfortable. Restriction for the platforms where it does not.

Lord Young of Acton, the human rights lawyer who founded the Free Speech Union, put it with the right amount of contempt. The Prime Minister has apparently decided that censoring social media should be his legacy, which is strange territory for a former human rights lawyer to choose. It is strange only if you assume the goal was ever free expression rather than managed expression. Nothing in this government's conduct this month supports that assumption.

A government that needs to legislate prominence for its preferred broadcaster is not protecting the public from disinformation. It is admitting that its preferred broadcaster cannot earn that prominence on the evidence of its own reporting, and has decided to mandate by law what trust no longer provides voluntarily. That is not journalism policy. It is state media privilege written into platform regulation, arriving in the same fortnight as a ban on what sixteen year olds may read, from a government that is rapidly running out of ways to disguise what it is actually doing.

"The BBC spliced together two separate parts of a Donald Trump speech, delivered an hour apart, to make it appear he had directly told his supporters to march on the Capitol and fight"

[Fiona Rose Diamond @CoviLeaks]

Starmer's potential exit is just theatre. The WEF doesn't care who wears the suit; the 'One Big Club' always has another puppet ready to code your digital panopticon. Changing the warden won't unlock the cage when globalists already own the prison. Same script, different actor.

[Ryan @offgriddesigner]

These two WEF puppets are following a script that ends in a new world order.

A world order that steals every type of freedom from us.

One may replace the other in the coming days, but NOTHING will change until these WEF parasites are removed from governments around the world.

[S A M M Y Woodhouse @officialsammyuk]

Due to the Sentencing Act 2026, Arshid Hussain – the man who abducted and raped me as a child, and who did the same to dozens of other children – is being considered for early release. He was sentenced to 35 years in prison in early 2017 and was described as one of the most dangerous men in the UK. He was later convicted of further offences.

His brother, Basharat Hussain, is also being considered for release.

I honestly can’t put into words how disgusted I am with the British government.

[AwakenedOutlaw⚒️ @AwakenedOutlaw]

Stop and think about this for a moment.

How can the top news organization in the UK justify ignoring perhaps the most significant story in the country... and, for that matter, the world?

The only possible takeaway is that it's an intentional effort to provide cover for the rape gangs and the politicians involved in enabling and protecting them as they perpetrated the most horrific crimes imaginable, and on a breathtaking scale.

This represents a complete betrayal of everything they claim to stand for and the people they serve. One could even argue culpability via the cover-up.

For this and many other transgressions they've been similarly involved with, their entire media outfit deserves to be demolished... and I mean reduced to ash from stem to stern and jettisoned into deep space.

From their Charter: "TRUST is the foundation of the BBC - we’re independent, impartial and truthful"

[The British Patriot @TheBritLad]

🚨WOW: Sadiq Khan personally READ reports on young girls gang-raped in London hotels by Muslims plied with drugs, threatened & abused.

YET on multiple occasions, he publicly denied grooming gangs exist in the capital.

This denial has enabled abuse.

Accountability is overdue.