GMP TOLD A COP HE WENT "TOO FAR"
Pete Jackson @PeteJacksonGMP spent over a decade as head of Greater Manchester Police's @gmpolice major incident team. He blew the whistle on things that should have ended careers.
Human remains of Harold Shipman's victims secretly destroyed without families knowing. A suspected paedo phile allowed to take a child into a house for over two hours while police officers stood outside and watched.
Reckless tactics during the manhunt for cop-killer Dale Cregan that put officers in danger.
He raised all of it. He was sidelined. Passed over for promotion. Run out of the force.
In August 2018 he sat down with Andy Burnham and fellow whistleblower Maggie Oliver @MaggieOliverUK to lay it all out. Burnham sent a dismissal letter 13 months later.
In February 2024, an employment tribunal ruled Jackson had "gone too far" in his disclosures. The judge did acknowledge, in the same breath, that some of what he alleged "clearly happened."
Read that again. It clearly happened. But he went too far by saying so.
Jackson called the ruling "perverse" and said it made "a mockery of whistleblowing law." He warned it would have a chilling effect on every police officer who ever considers doing the right thing.
He is correct. That is precisely the point. That is how the system is designed to work.
Sources: Manchester Evening News @MENnewsdesk, Neil Wilby Media @Neil_Wilby
“After he was stabbed Mr Nowak tried to climb a fence to escape but Digwa was 'aggressively pursuing' him, leaving a trail of blood, the court heard.
Police were called to the scene but arrested Mr Nowak after Digwa claimed he had been racially abused.
Mr Nowak was then handcuffed before passing out and dying in the street a short time later.”
So, basically this, again.
As some of you may know, my former account @TheSimonEvans has been hacked.
While pursuing this case, I am going to trade under this name for the time being.
Please do follow and RT! And ideally, QT to complain to @X. 🙏
I *do* want my history, archive and followers back!
In 2011, Breitbart breaks down how Frankfurt School Marxists like Adorno, Marcuse, & Horkheimer escaped Germany for 1940s Golden Age California -only to hate the endless cheer, productivity, and capitalism. They devised cultural Marxism to subvert the US.
They Were Here Because the State Put Them Here.
On Thursday, three failed asylum seekers were convicted of gang rape at Hove Crown Court. Abdulla Ahmadi, an Iranian, and two Egyptians, Karin Al-Danasurt and Ibrahim Alshafe, had arrived in Britain on small boats, been housed in a Home Office-approved hotel in Horsham, and spent an October night hunting a lone woman on Brighton beach. The prosecutor told the court they did not see their victim as a human being. They saw meat. They laughed while they raped her. They filmed it. Then they went back to the hotel and had a barbecue.
Al-Danasurt was a convicted murderer in Egypt who had fled specifically to avoid a lengthy prison sentence. He was granted asylum accommodation by the British state. On the same day as the conviction, Shabana Mahmood was in Dunkirk signing a £662 million deal with the French and calling it a landmark.
The detention centre at the heart of that deal holds 140 people. Forty-one thousand crossed the Channel last year. The arithmetic is not complicated. This is not a solution. It is a gesture with a budget and a camera crew.
And yet even that framing is too generous. Because if Britain, or France, truly wanted to stop the boats, they could. France accepts British money to intercept when it suits, which proves cooperation is purchasable. Australia stopped its boats entirely using turn-backs and offshore processing. Britain has the navy, the coastguard and the surveillance capability to do the same. What it lacks is the will. And the 2039 accommodation contracts, worth an estimated £10 billion, are the proof. You do not sign thirteen-year housing contracts for a problem you intend to solve. You sign them for a situation you have decided to manage permanently while telling the public something different.
That gap between the rhetoric and the reality is not accidental. It is the product of a progressive political culture that has made certain conclusions unreachable regardless of the evidence. Liverpool Council publishes official guidance telling residents there is no link between asylum seeker populations and violence against women, and commits public money to correcting anyone who says otherwise. The Equality and Human Rights Commission warns that describing migration as a risk is itself suspect. The legal industry turns every removal into a decade-long obstacle course. The NGO sector cites appeal success rates as proof of injustice rather than proof of a system designed to exhaust the state into surrender. None of this requires coordination. It requires only shared assumptions: that naming cultural risk is racism, that enforcement is cruelty, and that public concern is ignorance to be managed.
The Brighton conviction did not emerge from nowhere. It emerged from a system that brings in large numbers of unknown men from countries where women are treated as property, houses them in unsupervised hotels and dispersal accommodation in ordinary communities, near schools, parks and playgrounds, where they are free to come and go as they please, fails to remove them when their claims are rejected, and then instructs the public not to draw connections. One of Thursday's convicted rapists had a murder conviction in another country. He was here anyway. He was housed here anyway. And the government's response, on the day of his conviction, was a photo opportunity on a French beach.
There is a test that cuts through all of it. If forty thousand armed men crossed the Channel each year, the navy would be deployed and the boats would be stopped. The fact that they are not is a political choice. British women are paying for that choice. The Brighton victim paid for it on a beach in October.
She will pay for it for the rest of her life.
"Al-Danasurt was a convicted murderer in Egypt who had fled specifically to avoid a lengthy prison sentence. He was granted asylum accommodation by the British state."
Since Andy Burnham is apparently lining up to be the next Labour leader, here’s a reminder:
Andy accused victims of Pakistani-Muslim grooming gangs of trying to “propagandise” the issue.
He tried to block the grooming gangs inquiry in Manchester and nationally.
He claimed that Pakistani-Muslims grooming gangs are a “thing of the past” despite clear evidence that little girls are still being victimised to this day, including in his local area.
He tried to shift the blame onto victims by refusing to acknowledge them as children —
Children who were raped, exploited and even murdered by Pakistani grooming gangs while powerful people like him turned a blind eye.
Andy Burnham belongs in prison, not in Parliament. And certainly not in 10 Downing Street.
I often think about what happened during lockdown, thanks to men like Zahawi. All seemingly forgotten, like it never happened. Our darkest period of recent history.
The pressure that people came under to take that vaccine was appalling. State-endorsed blackmail from Zahawi and others.
People lost their jobs, their livelihoods. For some, even their lives. And that isn't 'anti-vax' or whatever else. It's the truth.
The sheer volume of messages I have received over the last few days from those affected has been heartbreaking.
I see Reform are dropping in the polls since their warm welcome for him, and I entirely understand why.
The man stated that children could overrule their parents to take that vaccine.
Just think about that. It is evil. I'm sorry, there is no other word for it - for so many different reasons.
To see that man back in frontline politics with Reform makes me feel sick. I have no doubt we'll soon see him running for Parliament. I will campaign against him, and I hope you all join me.
I made my opposition abundantly clear to his vaccine mandate filth at the time, and my position has not changed one inch since.
This exchange alone vindicates the Lords’ scrutiny process.
The bill has always had this chilling element, but in the Commons Kim Leadbeater controlled the committee stage and generally avoided this kind of scrutiny.
Do people silent on EU sanctioned Baud — no money, no food, no travel — realize he is an example to scare everyone else into silence?
Ursula implemented a censorship-by-punishment system to ban any dissent. She trialed it during COVID & sadistically perfecting it. Speak up!🧵👇
Wild London David Attenborough
I'm getting so many posts from lovely people absolutely outraged at the misinformation regarding hedgehogs and slugs presented on this show yesterday, so I'll just address it here.
David Attenbourough is a really lovely man, and has done an immense amount of good for us, our wildlife, and our planet.
But he, like any other TV presenter, relies on programme researchers for script content.
The researchers, in turn, rely on who they *perceive to be* experts in the field.
Unfortunately, they were taken in by some clever branding and chose the wrong people:
A self-proclaimed 'hedgehog expert', often funded by the British Hedgehog Preservation Society (see their most recent dangerous misinformation, and my response, published here:https://t.co/YWqTd4PIkv)
And the London Wildlife Trust.
Recently the London Wildlife Trust engaged me as an expert consultant on a 4 page spread article about hedgehog myths.
Many of you have seen my interview, and the draft of the subsequent article.
I was sent this draft (see 1st image below) for approval, to which I agreed.
However, before going to print, an executive at London Wildlife trust decided to do some editing of his own.
It's shocking, I know, and would be unbelievable, if not here in actual print.
I've included two versions of the full article below:
the first draft approved by me and the team at LWT, and the second actual printed version, after executive 'editing'.
It was this same London Wildlife Trust who co-produced the Wild London documentary and "provided expert help and advice".
So now you know.
We're all shocked.
But of course, as usual, it's the poor hedgehogs who will suffer.
People won't provide food for our critically endangered hedgehogs, or bother keeping their garden natural and wild, now they've been told that hedgehogs eat slugs.
After all, there's plenty of them to go round.
Rescues all around the country, who are treating hedgehogs dying of lungworm from being forced through starvation into eating slugs, will feel so demoralised and invalidated.
Like you, I'm furious, frustrated, and bone-wearily saddened.
Talking about freedom of speech, Ursula, this is a video of you telling a man that he is lucky to live in the EU, where there is free speech, while he is being arrested for protesting against you
I'm campaigning for all recordings of 'Karma Chameleon' to be recalled and the line 'I'm a man without conviction' to be altered to reflect Boy George's actual criminal record. What are you doing to improve Britain this Christmas?