SYLASGIBBS

Conspiracy theorist.. Apparently🤷‍♂️

[Next Bridge Hydrocarbons @nbhydrocarbons]

Next Bridge Hydrocarbons Answers Frequently Asked Questions Regarding the Upcoming Special Dividend of Common Stock

https://t.co/E45wqhwNua

[Nicholas Raia @NicholasRaia2]

After listening to today’s #MMAT bankruptcy hearing, it’s clear that @TheDTCC is deliberately stalling on providing the trustee-requested Correspondent Clearing Data. That data would almost certainly expose massive #MMAT settlement failures and connections to #MMTLP corporate action issues. When released, there will be severe damage to the DTCC’s reputation as the reliable backbone of U.S. markets and finally reveal “where the bodies are buried”.

[TradingSecrets @TradingSecrets7]

$MMTLP I have been made aware that Next Bridge will sell the first round of shares this week.

The big question for brokers is whether they will update MMTLP's last recorded trading price to $15 per share.

[SYLASGIBBS @AndyKGibbo]

@SamsUxyyeah I have now transferred my shares to AST/Equiniti, I hope that was the right thing to do 🤯

How do you say this playing out?

[SYLASGIBBS @AndyKGibbo]

@Mmtlp3 @TradingSecrets7 @Crypto_mushroom So paying $30 is a no brainer

[SYLASGIBBS @AndyKGibbo]

@Mmtlp3 @TradingSecrets7 @Crypto_mushroom Does this mean if I pay $30, my shares will be transferred to AST?

[SYLASGIBBS @AndyKGibbo]

@JunkSavvy @xMarketNews So if I pay the £30, does that mean they will get transferred to AST?

[George Palikaras @palikaras]

🚨Breaking news: 🦋

@Nasdaq just LOST its Motion to Quash.

Read that again s l o w l y . . .

The Bankruptcy Court in Nevada has now ordered Nasdaq to produce extensive $MMAT/TRCH trading data under Rule 2004, including RASH and CORE data, order attributes, cancellations, replaces, executions, and related transaction records covering nearly FOUR YEARS.

The Court was NOT persuaded by the ‘undue burden’ argument, noting that producing ~15GB of spreadsheet data is not exactly impossible for… Nasdaq. (One $10 usb stick)

Even more important, the Court explicitly recognized the Trustee’s AUTHORITY to investigate whether wrongdoing occurred on behalf of the estate, including potential claims tied to stock trading activity.

Translation:
This investigation is very much ALIVE.

For months, some people mocked and undermined the Trustee’s efforts, claimed discovery would never happen, and acted like every subpoena didn’t get served initially and that it would be crushed before daylight. Instead, the wall keeps cracking.

FINRA discovery.
Now Nasdaq discovery.
And the Court explicitly referenced separate pending motions involving Citadel, Virtu, and Anson.

Interesting times ahead.

Turns out Rule 2004 is not just a decorative suggestion.

To the Trustee and legal teams, incredible respect.

It takes courage to walk into rooms filled with institutions that have virtually unlimited resources and say:

‘Produce the data’

And to the echo chambers already warming up their spin machines tonight…

You may want to read the actual order first. 🤝

Blessings to all.

[KKep @kimkep4796]

MMAT

⚖️Case: In re Meta Materials Inc.
Case No.: 24-50792-gs (Chapter 7, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Nevada)
Filing Date: May 14, 2026
Docs: 2773, 2774, 2774-1, 2775, 2776, 2776-1 (Documents in comment section)
⚠️ Not Legal Advice

Big Picture (Plain English)

These filings look like the trustee broadening the financial investigation from market/trading discovery into the company’s banking records.

Translation:
The trustee isn’t just asking “What happened in the market?” anymore. She’s also asking “What happened to the company’s money?” 💸 ❓

⸻
DOC 2773 — Ex Parte Motion re Silicon Valley Bank

What it is:
The trustee asks the court for permission to compel Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) to provide records and potentially have a records custodian examined under Bankruptcy Rule 2004.

Layman’s version:
“Judge, we need SVB’s records to trace Meta’s money.”

What they want:

Account ending 7741
Account ending 7011
Any linked/associated accounts
Date range: Aug. 5, 2023 to present
Including:
monthly statements
deposits
withdrawals
wires
ACH transfers
checks (front/back)
internal transfers

Why this matters:
Trustee explicitly says she wants to understand:

potential disbursement of debtor property
how those disbursements affected Meta’s financial condition
possible recovery for the estate

Translation:
This is classic money-tracing.

⸻
DOC 2774 — Notice of Subpoena to SVB

What it is:
Formal notice that the trustee intends to subpoena SVB.

This isn’t arguing the merits—it’s procedural notice to interested parties.

Plain English:
“FYI everyone, the subpoena is being served.”

⸻
DOC 2774-1 — SVB Subpoena (image below)

What it is:
The actual subpoena paperwork sent to SVB.

Notable points:

SVB gets ~21 days from service unless otherwise arranged
Standard subpoena protections apply:
can object
can seek to quash
privilege protections exist

Plain English:
This is the enforceable “produce the records” document.

⸻
DOC 2775 — Ex Parte Motion re JPMorgan Chase

Same concept as SVB—but bigger.

🗄️Trustee wants Chase records under Rule 2004.

Accounts requested:

ending 5780, 5970, 6175, 1145, 1946, 6174, plus linked accounts

Date range:
Aug. 5, 2023 to present

Same requested records:

statements, deposits, withdrawals, wires, ACH, checks, internal transfers

Plain English:
“Show us where the money went.”

⸻
DOC 2776 — Notice of Subpoena to JPMorgan Chase

Procedural notice to parties that Chase will be subpoenaed.

Nothing dramatic by itself.

⸻
DOC 2776-1 — JPMorgan Chase Subpoena (image below)

Actual subpoena paperwork to Chase.

Again:

compliance required unless objection
subpoena enforcement mechanisms, exist failure can lead to contempt under Rule 45

⸻
Why This Matters (Strategic View)

This appears to be a parallel investigative track:

Track 1: Market conduct

Already ongoing:

FINRA
Nasdaq
Citadel
Virtu
Anson Funds
DTCC
Schwab
TD Ameritrade
TradeStation

Focus:
Was market activity harming Meta?

⸻
🏦Track 2: Internal financial trail 👀

New here:

📑 JPMorgan
📑 SVB

Focus:
💵What happened to Meta’s cash❓

⸻
🏦The trustee may be trying to answer questions like:

Did cash leave the company in problematic ways?
Were transfers ordinary business activity?
Were there potentially avoidable transfers?
Were there insiders/payees worth examining?
Are there recoverable estate assets?

Rule 2004 is intentionally broad, and this fits squarely inside a trustee’s investigative powers. 🔍

⸻
✅ Bottom Line

This is not about naked shorting.

This is about following the money inside Meta Materials itself.

If the prior subpoena wave was:

“What happened in the market?”

This wave is:

“What happened in Meta’s bank accounts?” 🕵️‍♀️💵

[SYLASGIBBS @AndyKGibbo]

@arun07858349 @TradingSecrets7 Me too

[Ann Vandersteel™️ @annvandersteel]

COURT DOCS DRAG ANSON FUNDS INTO THE LIGHT

Wall Street didn’t just break the rules with #MMTLP, they exposed the entire rigged system.

Anson Funds is now being dragged into court under oath… and why?

Because reports show MILLIONS of phantom shares aka naked shorts that were never borrowed, never delivered, and never supposed to exist.

Meanwhile Rretail investors followed the rules.
They bought shares.
They held positions.

And then the system (FINRA) hit the kill switch.

Trading halted.
Positions frozen.
Truth buried.

Meanwhile, hedge funds allegedly played a different game, selling what they didn’t own, flooding the market with synthetic supply, and crushing real investors under counterfeit pressure.

This is what financial fraud looks like.

Even more damning?
Regulators had warnings.
Data trails exist , CAT systems, DTCC records, settlement failures.

And yet… silence.

Or worse, as emails between the SEC and Wall Street would prove, protection.

Anson already settled with the SEC over undisclosed short-selling relationships. Now they’re being forced to explain their MMTLP exposure under oath.

This isn’t just one hedge fund.

This is a systemic operation:
• Phantom shares
• Coordinated short attacks
• Media influence
• Regulatory failure

The American market is supposed to be the gold standard. (What a crock of shit that is)

Instead, it’s looking like a rigged casino where insiders print shares out of thin air and call it “liquidity.”
(Sounds like the Federal Reserve, doesn’t it?)

MMTLP isn’t over.

It’s the thread that unravels everything.

And WHEN the truth comes out , it won’t just be Anson on trial.

It’ll be the entire system.

#MMTLP #NakedShorting #MarketFraud #WallStreet
@stockmannnbroo

[elf @ElfCarbon]

Aka - I have evidence of a Hong Kong broker literally naked short selling - they distributed shares that they could not possibly have because the company hadn't even distributed.

Then, a Hong Kong investment company used their ownership influence on American media to straight up gaslight the world into thinking $MMTLP wasn't manipulated with a cute little cartoon - when their country was the first one who did the manipulating.

To all the shareholders who have contributed their data, when this is all over I hope to thank you. Its helped with research in the most unexpected ways.

[Charles V Payne @cvpayne]

This is huge!

[George Palikaras @palikaras]

This is a very interesting new case vs #Anson and a few others, relevant to #MMAT/#MMTLP and many others affected by these bad actors, from my initial read they have an entire team.

I wonder which of the shills in our community know
Mr Kassam on a first name basis… I have a few in mind who are yapping almost every night. 🤡

[Ann Vandersteel™️ @annvandersteel]

George!! This is massive!

This ruling just changed everything.

The trustee now has access to real trading data including dark pool activity. Not the delayed version the public has been fed.

Five minute snapshots hide the truth.
Ten second data starts to expose it.

Now we begin to see which broker dealers were active and who may have been manipulating the market.

If the patterns are there, the next step is deeper forensic data.

Evidence incoming! Wooohooo

#MMTLP #MMAT

[Stephanie 🇬🇧🇺🇸🦍 @stephmase22]

📣📣DEVIN NUNES WE KNOW YOU KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON 🚨🚨

This is from 2 years ago. Still no action for DJT or MMTLP that you cited in your letters to Congress and the NASDAQ.

WHEN ACTION ❓️❓️

[JunkSavvy @JunkSavvy]

💥UPDATE: LONGEST PENDING S-1 IN HISTORY!!!💥

✅NBH 2025 10K Filed
✅NBH S-1 Amendment 6 Filed
✅NBH COMPLIANT & UP-TO-DATE
*Next filing due May 15, 2026.

All EYES on SEC and Karl Hiller/Jennifer Gallagher.

15+ rounds of comments/questions for a simple capital raise for shares that DON'T TRADE on a public exchange or market.

⁉️Why would SEC’s Karl Hiller demand NBH restate previous year's financials, inflating valuations for assets the issuer no longer holds??? 🤔
“Inflated” valuations that were established by an auditing firm that the SEC has sanctioned from ever providing services to public reporting companies??? #Borgers

DELAY...DELAY...DELAY...3+ YEARS!!!

⁉️Why is the SEC (and FINRA) fighting transparency at every front??? Issuer, Congress, Federal Courts, etc.???...

⁉️If "nobody knows what to do," according to SEC Commissioner Peirce, would not transparency be a good place to start???

⁉️SEC, FINRA and FIF (broker-dealers) have confirmed there is a settlement issue and shares can not be delivered. So, why not let NBH be part of the reconcilliation with their share offering???

WHAT ARE THEY HIDING???...

⁉️When/if shares become available, is the SEC going to enforce THE LAW as Chairman Atkins proclaims as part of a "New Day at the SEC"??? You know, SEA 15c3-3 and RegSHO closeout requirements...

TRANSPARENCY AND EXPOSURE ARE COMING!!! #MetaBK

WE ARE NOT GOING AWAY!!! #Relentless

Hey Karl,
Are self-proclaimed, alleged whistlblowers acting with MALICE???
MALICE: desire to cause pain, injury, or distress to another.
Does MALICE impact whistleblower protections???
"specifically knowingly reporting false information—can severely damage or eliminate a whistleblower's legal protections and viability."
You may have a problem here...
Doesn't exactly sound like just a "concerned citizen and investor" does it???
#Discovery #Weaponized #EO14147 #AnatomyOfAShortAttack

[Mama K @fromveiltovail]

$mmtlp, $trch, $mmat We have been stolen from by our government! They are trying to force us into just getting over it! Bad News! They picked the wrong group of investors! $MMTLP ARMY is fighting a battle against our own Government for what is right! They Know the Truth, So Do We

[kristen shaughnessy @kshaughnessy2]

Could the SEC be any more obvious about wiping out MMTLP trading records?

They say it takes 36 months to even begin reviewing some “complex” MMTLP/MMAT FOIA requests.

So is anyone surprised the SEC now wants to delete trading data after 3 years — knowing it includes the exact MMTLP/MMAT CAT data those FOIAs are asking for??

@kimkep4796 @palikaras @whisskier @bleedblue18
@busybrands @JunkSavvy