@AllAmPotatoes@fakesportsbot@907username@JeffPassan I just don’t get why you are so worked up about it. I guess we could ban deferred money but who cares? That’s not why the Dodgers got him and not what allows them to run high payrolls.
@AllAmPotatoes@fakesportsbot@907username@JeffPassan Who cares how it was reported. The cost to the team, and the benefit to the player, is the equivalent of $45/year while he’s playing, which is when the CBT hit should occur.
@AllAmPotatoes@fakesportsbot@907username@JeffPassan Yeah but $70 in 2040 is like $45 today. It’s the same thing economically. Anyone who was willing to pay $45 today would have been fine paying $70 in 15 years.
@907username@JeffPassan You mean count the deferred salary in the playing year? That doesn’t bother me. It just makes it harder for the team deferring salary in the future.
@_willyjay19@NickNelsonMN They won’t get hardly anything in return for those guys though. And Jeffers will be leaving, would be good to get something for him