Jennifer Lawrence says celebrity political opinions do not change votes and can make people reject their films
“The first Trump administration was so wild and just, ‘How can we let this stand?’ I felt like I was running around like a chicken with my head cut off”
“But as we’ve learned election after election, celebrities do not make a difference whatsoever on who people vote for”
“And so then what am I doing? I’m just sharing my opinion on something that’s going to add fuel to a fire that’s ripping the country apart. We are so divided”
“I’m also an artist, and with this temperature and the way things can turn out, I don’t want to start turning people off to films and to art that could change consciousness or change the world because they don’t like my political opinions”
“I want to protect my craft so that you can still get lost in what I’m doing, what I’m showing”
@saradotxyz I don’t want to know a celebrity’s political opinion to know who *I* should vote for. I want to know because I want to know who they *are*. Because the one thing she’s right about is that I don’t want to support their films if they’re a POS. Or, I guess, in her case, a coward.
@saradotxyz I get what she is saying but how much more money does she need to make or how much more famous does she need to be? Because she can keep doing her craft while working with people who shares her thoughts, she just won't be on magazine covers.
🎬 “Celebrities don’t influence how people vote whatsoever.”
Interesting. We literally have an advertising industry that measures how much a particular person’s face, reputation, endorsement, and audience can influence what people buy. Companies pay fortunes for that influence. 📊💰
But apparently the same human being who can influence what sneakers you buy, what perfume you wear, what movie you watch, and what brand you trust suddenly becomes psychologically invisible the moment politics enters the room. 😂
Maybe celebrity influence on elections is limited, inconsistent, or sometimes even backfires. That’s reasonable.
But “no influence whatsoever”?
As we say: you wanted to make a grand statement so badly you forgot not to shit yourself doing it. 😂🎤
My brother who hasn’t turned on his PS3 or used PSN in over 10 years decided to boot up his ps3 to play something that is currently DOWNLOADED on the console.
Licenses are expired and his PSN account is deleted. So games are gone forever
WOOOOO!!!!!
A 150k attended trans pride as opposed to the few dozen who attend anti trans events but the BBC only chooses to describe it as “thousands” because the playing down of the attendance by the BBC and the media generally is very much deliberate.
if you PURPOSEFULLY misgender a trans person simply because you do not like them, even if you are gay, lesbian, bi, queer etc,
you are still transphobic
Nope, straight men are simply heteroSEXUAL but homoROMANTIC.
Words have definition, and calling mysoginistic men gay is not the answer to issues like this.
In some shape and form, women are the same way, the bigger issue with men is all the other 💩 patriarchy taught them.
Most men ACTUALLY are ġay. They're literally ġay. Because they don't really like us women. Our natural bodies, they think it's gross. Our interests, they think it's cringe. Spending time with us, they think it's like a responsibility. And if a guy has a girlfriend, and instead of date night with her, he genuinely wants to be with the boys, and he feels it's a punishment that he can't spend time with his boys, he doesn't really like her. So I genuinely think most men are gay but they haven't figured it out because being ġay is like also too feminine for them and they don't like feminine things.