The LARGEST COVID shot autopsy study EVER conducted found 73.9% of deaths after vaccination were caused by the shot.
Three independent analyses estimate that COVID shots killed 470,000–900,000 Americans—more than America’s losses in WWI, WWII, Vietnam, and Iraq COMBINED.
50 years later, the CDC admits the polio vaccine was tainted with SV40, a cancer-causing virus from monkey cells.
Up to 30 million Americans received it.
‘Coincidentally,’ cancer rates exploded in the following decades.
But today’s vaccines? Totally safe, they promise.
The pattern is clear …
The exact number of people exposed worldwide is unknown but likely tens of millions … 🌎
• In the 1950s–early 1960s, millions of doses of polio vaccine (both injected and oral) were contaminated with SV40, a virus from monkey kidney cells used to grow the vaccine.
• The CDC estimates 10–30 million Americans received SV40-contaminated polio vaccine.
• SV40 has been found in certain human cancers (brain, bone, lung, etc.), but the CDC and most official sources say the evidence does not prove it causes cancer in humans — though some studies show conflicting results and more research is needed.
The contamination was discovered in 1960, but contaminated lots continued to be used for a while after that.
Chemotherapy costs $111,000 a year to destroy the body.
Ivermectin costs a few grand a year to exert 12 anti-cancer mechanisms and NOT destroy the body.
SUMMER SHOCK: Parents are spraying & lathering chemical sunscreen all over their kids… and those chemicals get ABSORBED straight into the body!
It’s everywhere right now — kids covered head to toe in the stuff. But sunlight is what helps your body make Vitamin D… which actually fights cancer. This video exposes it all: Many chemical sunscreens contain hormone disruptors like oxybenzone and octinoxate. They soak into your bloodstream and have been linked to serious health concerns.
There ARE better ways — natural mineral options with zinc oxide that REFLECT the harmful UV rays instead of letting chemicals absorb. I use coconut or apricot oil to protect my skin if I am out in the sun more than 30 minutes, It is a natural SPF.
No more toxic chemicals on your children! Watch this eye-opening video
What’s your take — have you ditched the chemical stuff? Drop your thoughts below 👇
Greg Harrison has done more than anyone I know when it comes to doing the research on the clots.
Most people don't know him.
I have been communicating with him for years now and others as well.
How is it that a retired chemist and a handful of others can do this research and find answers but the establishment with great resources and funding haven't?
Is it because they don't want to know?
Have they been told not to?
I think they are afraid of the liability that comes from the truth. When they link it the spike protein it will make the mRNA vaccine dangerous because the vaccine was designed to make the body create the spike protein.
Remember that it was experimental!!! Then they pushed the mandates with no long term safety studies. Those mandates make the ones mandating them liable.
Who wants that liability?
Seek the truth and God 🙏
Be kind 🙏
Strive to do what is right 🙏
"I've diagnosed over 20,000 cancer patients in my career… I've NEVER seen anything like this."
— Dr. William Makis, MD
Stage 4 breast cancer in women in their 20s.
Stage 4 colon cancer in men and women in their 20s and 30s.
Leukemias that kill within days—or even hours.
Lymphomas that kill within a month.
These "turbo cancers" are reportedly affecting vaccinated Canadian doctors, medical students, and residents, presenting at Stage 4 and proving fatal within months.
According to the claim, 99.9% of Canadian doctors received the COVID-19 vaccines.
This is not normal. This is not a coincidence.
Some people believe the vaccines are responsible for these cancers.
🚨 DR. WILLIAM MAKIS SAYS THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT IVERMECTIN DOSING GRAPH HE'S CREATED.
Not a new chemotherapy drug.
Not a breakthrough immunotherapy.
Not a billion-dollar cancer treatment.
Just one simple dosing strategy.
According to Dr. William Makis, this is the dosing framework he believes everyone researching repurposed medicines for cancer should understand first.
And it all starts with one number.
📌 1 mg/kg/day.
Before explaining why, here's the dosing framework Dr. Makis discusses.
📊 The Four Ivermectin Dosing Ranges
🟢 Low Dose: ≤0.5 mg/kg/day
Used for cancers in remission, strong family history, genetic predisposition, prophylaxis, and lower-dose protocols discussed in published case reports.
🟡 Medium Dose: 1.0 mg/kg/day
Dr. Makis' recommended starting dose for most cancers.
🔵 High Dose: 2.0 mg/kg/day
Discussed for very aggressive cancers, including leukaemia, pancreatic cancer, and some brain cancers.
🔴 Very High Dose: ≥2.5 mg/kg/day
Discussed in selected reported cases involving extensive metastatic disease or extremely poor prognosis, where temporary visual side effects have also been reported.
Now here's why Dr. Makis believes 1 mg/kg/day deserves the most attention.
After reviewing laboratory research, published studies, and numerous case reports, he says this is the starting dose he recommends for most cancers.
According to Dr. Makis, research has investigated Ivermectin across a surprisingly wide range of cancers, including:
• Breast cancer
• Colon cancer
• Lung cancer
• Pancreatic cancer
• Kidney (renal cell) cancer
• Gastric cancer
• Leukemia
One exception stood out.
Lymphoma.
Dr. Makis says he has found very little published research involving Ivermectin and lymphoma.
That doesn't mean it doesn't work.
It simply means the evidence is currently limited.
❓What does 1 mg/kg/day actually look like?
For someone weighing 60 kg (132 lbs)...
That's approximately 60 mg of Ivermectin every day.
Equivalent to:
💊 Five 12 mg tablets
OR
💧 About 6 mL of liquid Ivermectin, roughly one teaspoon.
According to Dr. Makis, that's where he recommends starting for many cancers.
Can lower doses still have an effect?
✅ He believes they can.
Dr. Makis discusses a published ovarian cancer case reported by Dr. Tess Lawrie.
The dosing chart lists the patient as receiving 12 mg of Ivermectin per day. During his discussion, Dr. Makis explains that this was approximately 0.2 mg/kg/day, placing it within the chart's Low Dose (≤0.5 mg/kg/day) range.
📉 According to the case report, the patient's CA125 tumor marker reportedly fell from 288 to 22 after two months.
That case is one reason Dr. Makis believes Ivermectin may have anticancer activity even at lower doses.
However...
He also believes the available evidence suggests the effect is dose dependent.
In other words...
Higher doses may produce greater effects, although more clinical research is needed.
What about the most aggressive cancers?
• Pancreatic cancer
• Leukemia
• Brain cancer
For cancers like these, Dr. Makis discusses doses around 2 mg/kg/day in selected situations.
He notes that Ivermectin crosses the blood-brain barrier, although not very efficiently, which is one reason he says higher doses may be considered for some brain cancers.
He also discusses a case reported by Dr. Allan Landrito.
According to Dr. Makis, a physician with terminal gallbladder cancer reportedly took 2 mg/kg/day for 14 months.
He says her cancer eventually disappeared.
She experienced temporary visual side effects that resolved after a few days.
❓How high have reported doses gone?
According to Dr. Makis, he has seen reported doses as high as 2.5 mg/kg/day.
He references patients treated by Dr. Shankara Chetty who reportedly used those doses without long-term side effects, although some experienced temporary visual disturbances that later resolved.
One point Dr. Makis returns to repeatedly...
Long-term use.
He references the Castro study involving children with leukemia who reportedly received Ivermectin for six months without long-term side effects.
He also discusses anecdotal reports of adults taking it daily for more than a year without long-term toxicity.
So why aren't there larger cancer trials?
Dr. Makis believes one of the biggest obstacles is economics.
Because Ivermectin is an off-patent generic medicine, he argues there is little financial incentive to fund large clinical trials.
Whether future research ultimately confirms or challenges these ideas remains to be seen.
But Dr. Makis' message is remarkably simple.
One graph.
One dosing strategy.
One starting point.
📌 1 mg/kg/day.
Because the conversation isn't just about Ivermectin anymore.
It's about whether repurposed drugs deserve the same level of scientific investigation as newer therapies.
🗨️ Do you think inexpensive repurposed medicines like Ivermectin deserve larger, well-designed clinical trials for cancer?
🔖 Save this post so you'll always have Dr. Makis' dosing framework handy, and repost it to help others discover the ongoing research into repurposed medicines.
#Ivermectin #CancerResearch #RepurposedDrugs #Oncology #CancerCare #MedicalResearch #PancreaticCancer #MakisMD #RxMeds
I’m glad that ABC is admitting that the toxic chemicals in your sunscreen are dangerous and cause cancer.
Everyone I know who has skin cancer wore them. 😬😭
Do you still put this on your kids?😭🤣🤯
baking soda CHANGES how your immune cells behave. for $0.02/day.
no seriously. read that again.
scientists had people drink baking soda in water for two weeks. then checked what happened inside their bodies.
the cells that cause inflammation? went DOWN.
the cells that calm inflammation? went UP.
in the spleen. in the blood. in the kidneys. everywhere.
do you know what that means?
your immune system — the thing that’s supposed to PROTECT you — was attacking your own body. your joints. your gut. your skin.
baking soda told it to stop.
the researchers’ exact words? your spleen got the message: “it’s a hamburger. not an infection.”
exactly. your body thought everything was a threat. baking soda said relax. it’s just food.
(Ray et al., 2018 — Journal of Immunology)
arthritis. lupus. IBD. psoriasis. all caused by your own immune system fighting YOU.
your doctor prescribes drugs at $2,000/month. side effects? a whole page of them.
baking soda is in your kitchen right now. $0.02/day.
half a teaspoon. glass of water. empty stomach. morning.
your immune system isn’t broken. it just forgot who the enemy is.
this isn’t advice. it’s a published study. do what you want with it.
Mysterious Flashes on September 11, 2001
This footage comes from WPIX Air 11 live reporting on 9/11.
The full video has never been released to the public, and was recently uploaded to YouTube by an unknown person (and now it seems to be gone).
A visitor near Sedona, Arizona, who wishes to remain anonymous, was filming the clouds when something unusual appeared above the red rocks.
At first, it looked like a faint rainbow caught inside a thin cloud—but the clouds continued moving while the strange formation remained almost perfectly still. Its position barely changed, yet its transparent body never stopped shifting. Different sections stretched, folded, dissolved and formed again without following any recognizable pattern.
The person recording slowly zoomed in for a closer look. There were no solid edges, lights, wings or visible structure—only an iridescent distortion that seemed to bend the sky behind it. When the camera zoomed back out, the anomaly was still hovering over the same location.
Was it an unusual atmospheric phenomenon, cloud iridesence? A plasma-like object? Or, a distortion caused by the camera, or something we still don’t understand?
#Sedona #Arizona #SkyAnomaly #Unexplained #StrangeSky #Mystery #CaughtOnCamera #AtmosphericPhenomenon #UAP
@duriansneedluv2@MaryBowdenMD Respectfully, I wasn't referring to manufacturing. I was referring to healthcare. A system can employ millions and still be inefficient, overpriced, and produce poor outcomes. Those issues are exactly why it needs to be rebuilt from the ground up. REBOOT.
Tiny stone stars from an ancient sea floor. These are star-shaped crinoid columnals, the fossilized stem pieces of sea lilies that lived hundreds of millions of years ago.