On my life, none of these people can actually articulate their "based" and "awesome" philosophical systems they supposedly hold to. Schelling, Hegel, Plotinus, Maximus, etc.; not one of them are technical enough to demonstrate anything sophisticated. Just corny progressives.
Itโs the same archetype of account over and over again. They all have the same brand of progressive politics borne from secular origins, pretend to be academically inclined, promote some eclectic mixture with Oriental philosophies, and virtue signal with posts like these.
I genuinely laugh at posts like these because they literally say nothing of substance at all. What is he even trying to say? If you find something boring, youโve already disproven its worth? These are genuinely mindless drones pretending like they actually know anything.
Nietzsche is completely irrelevant in criticizing Capeshitianity when you can simply open the bible and get bored reading Genesis. It is genuinely one of the most boring texts ever written only justified by neat little Psalms that may as well be disposable fortune cookie quips.
@JEDPBK I didnโt say โTheโ (uppercase) Oranje. I just said the Oranje, as in โthe [color] Oranje,โ or more specifically, I am referring to the idea of the color orange being an important part of Dutch culture and history.
@JEDPBK I didnโt say โTheโ (uppercase) Oranje. I just said the Oranje, as in โthe [color] Oranje,โ or more specifically, I am referring to the idea of the color orange being an important part of Dutch culture and history.
@OSwerve42069@SperglerAcolyte being literate on what historical figures have said doesnโt entail having a slave morality in just assenting to whatever theyโve said lol
@parhypostates@VenetianGaucho2 Ousia is evidently something substantial: present. Ousia as substance is cognate with being, essence; and โthe substanceโ is that which is receptive of the intelligible, arguably being the same term which at once, names both the highest genus, and the infima species.