Explaining how corporate power shapes food, health, and farming in America. Sheep farmer in northwest Ohio. Cancer survivor. President of @FarmActionUS.
URGENT:
Bayer-Monsanto is waging a propaganda war to trick Congress into giving them a pesticide liability shield.
They’re even threatening to pull glyphosate off the US market if they don’t get their way.
Meanwhile, farmers just want their rights.
Farm Action President Angela Huffman just broke down why farmers’ lives and livelihoods are on the line with the 2026 Farm Bill:
“This is personal for me.”
“I live in farm country and raise sheep on my family farm.”
“I was diagnosed with stage 3 cancer at 36.”
“I cannot tell you exactly what caused my cancer.”
“But I know what farmers, farmworkers and rural families live with every day.”
“Chemical exposure is in the air on spray days.”
“It is on equipment, trucks, clothes and skin.”
Bayer, the German multinational corporation that owns Monsanto, and its allies are pushing Congress for a liability shield that would let pesticide companies dodge state lawsuits over their failure to warn about the known risks of their products.
“Across the Corn Belt, cancer among young people is moving in the wrong direction.”
In 2015, the Washington Post uncovered that “cancer rates among people ages 15 to 49 in the six leading corn-producing states have been higher than the national average.”
And it’s not a stretch to link this rise to glyphosate, the main ingredient in Roundup.
“In 2015, the International Agency for Research on Cancer classified glyphosate as ‘probably carcinogenic to humans,’ citing evidence tied to non-Hodgkin lymphoma.”
“Since then, scientists have raised broader concerns about… harms to the liver, kidneys, reproductive and endocrine systems to neurological health, and children’s health.”
But this is the point that Congress needs to hear:
“We do not need to settle every scientific debate in one Farm Bill to know this: Congress should not give pesticide companies immunity while serious questions remain about the safety of their products.”
“If Congress wants to stand with farmers, it should reject pesticide immunity, protect state failure-to-warn claims and keep the courthouse doors open.”
And it should meaningfully invest in “technical assistance that help farmers reduce chemical dependence without risking their livelihoods.”
“If Bayer believes Roundup is safe, it can defend that in court.”
@AngelaSHuffman@DailyCaller
Farmers did not create this chemical-dependent system.
They should not be used as the excuse to give Bayer-Monsanto immunity.
Read more: https://t.co/WOrO9CWQOR
Dear @realDonaldTrump@POTUS,
Consumers can choose cheaper proteins instead of beef if prices get too high. But when Americans pull up to the gas pump, they have no alternative. Focus on lowering fuel prices instead of attacking cattle producers.”
@fadethecrowd@grok Agreed, retailers are a huge part of this. I discussed both meatpackers and grocery retailers in this interview because the consumer price problem is about monopoly power across the chain, not just one sector.
I joined ABC News this evening to talk about why the Trump administration’s plan to import more beef is unlikely to lower consumer prices.
The problem is not a lack of imported beef. The problem is lack of competition.
Four meatpackers control 85% of U.S. beef processing, and a handful of grocery giants control the checkout line.
When those few companies control the supply chain, it’s essentially a monopoly. They do not have to pass savings on to consumers.
More imports could help global meatpackers while putting new pressure on U.S. ranchers, who are finally starting to recover after years of drought, high costs, and unfair markets.
If we want lower beef prices for the long term, we have to break up monopoly power in the food system, starting with meatpackers and grocers.
The only bacon the “Save Our Bacon Act” is actually saving is China’s.
This isn’t just a states’ rights issue or an animal welfare issue, it’s a national security issue. China already controls roughly 25% of the American pork industry. Why would Congress pass legislation that further strengthens Beijing’s grip on America’s food supply?
“They're in there right now, the Department of Justice, arguing on behalf of Bayer to take away our right to be protected from those chemicals.”
The Trump administration says it wants to Make America Healthy Again, but behind closed doors it is fighting for foreign corporations to have immunity when their products harm Americans.
That is not MAHA.
That is not America First.
We deserve better.
@dcexaminer
“So we say: GO HOME BAYER!”
Farm Action President Angela Huffman says we must take a stand against Bayer and its onslaught of lobbying efforts across the country pushing for immunity from harm their products cause farmers.
“Bayer is working every angle to get special protections from the government.”
“They have pushed immunity bills in 15 states.”
“They are in front of the Supreme Court right now.”
“They are pushing this in Congress, right now.”
“The White House has already stepped in on Bayer’s behalf.”
“They’re threatening to pull glyphosate off the market.”
“They want people to think our food supply is at risk if they don’t get immunity.”
“It isn’t.”
“A multinational corporation doesn’t get to hold the U.S. food system hostage just to escape accountability.”
“The Trump administration promised a healthier food system, but they’re doing the opposite.”
The current system leaves farmers with too few choices and too much dependence on expensive chemical inputs.
Farm Action President Angela Huffman tells NewsNation that the administration is now backing Bayer-Monsanto in a Supreme Court case that could decide whether farmers and consumers can hold a company accountable for harming them.
People were promised reform, but they’re seeing the same system defended.
Bayer is holding our food supply hostage, and no corporation should have that kind of power.
Farmers deserve support to move toward healthier soil and fewer expensive chemical inputs.
And we all deserve accountability when harmful products cause damage.
The administration should stand with farmers and families, not cave to corporate pressure.
There are plenty of cowboy hat wearing farmers who have cancer, Parkinson’s, ALS - who don’t get funded by Bayer to march through Congress to beg for a liability shield for foreign chemical manufacturers. Disgusting.
BREAKING:
Trump’s DOJ is reportedly about to file an antitrust lawsuit against the biggest egg companies for alleged price gouging.
This is a huge step for farmers and consumers.
Our investigations exposed this price gouging and urged the Trump administration to take action last year.
The lawsuit will reportedly target Cal-Maine Foods and Versova, both of which “significantly hiked egg prices in 2024 and 2025” due to an alleged “supply shortage attributed to avian flu.”
These massive corporations have abused their market power to spike egg prices and make record profits in recent years, despite maintaining steady production throughout the avian flu outbreak.
Farm Action President Angela Huffman declared:
“For years, these corporations pointed to avian flu as justification for soaring egg prices, even as Farm Action’s investigation showed dominant firms were maintaining production while dramatically increasing prices and profits.”
“We urge antitrust enforcers to hold these companies accountable to the fullest extent of the law.”
“Anything less risks allowing dominant firms to continue treating penalties as the cost of doing business rather than a deterrent for cheating the American people on a grocery store staple.”
@TheJusticeDept@AngelaSHuffman
The Hill today. @chelliepingree (D-Maine) and I co-authored an op-ed about why the pesticide liability shield is a beyond partisan crisis - everyone needs to get on board to defeat pesticide company protections. https://t.co/JPuIA0jmC4
Also, the Biden administration barely talked about their work on this. I said at the time the president should be tweeting about it when they finalized the rule. Now, the White House is doing that.
It pisses me off that Trump is taking credit for something he refused to do during his first term, but at the same time, the Biden administration stepped back and didn’t take credit for their own work, allowing this to happen.
@musharbash_b And importantly, we filed the petition with the first Trump administration’s USDA to close the labeling loophole, and they denied it. Then Biden took it up when in office.
@Charles_Benoit@AnnaRMatson We at @FarmActionUS filed a petition to USDA asking them to close the Product of USA labeling loophole during Trump's first administration, and USDA denied our petition. Then we took it to Biden's USDA and they approved it.
We just helped deliver a historic win for American ranchers.
For years, a loophole allowed foreign meat to be labeled “Product of USA.”
This loophole undercut American ranchers, misled consumers, and empowered massive corporations.
That loophole is now officially CLOSED.
We’ve spent 8 years fighting for this change.
And it’s one of our biggest victories yet.
Closing this loophole empowers U.S. ranchers and enforces transparency for consumers.
But this is only step one.
This rule does not require all meat to carry a country of origin label.
The “Product of USA” label is optional, so it can give U.S. ranchers a leg up, but imported meat can still be sold with no transparency on its origin.
To achieve full transparency, we are calling to restore Mandatory Country of Origin Labeling, which was repealed in 2015 due to corporate pressure.
Read our full blog below breaking down why this change is meaningful, and why we still need MCOOL:🧵