We willen groeien, maar belasten de economie kapot. We willen meer woningen, maar belasten huurwoningen weg. We willen AI koploper zijn, maar geen datacenters. We willen voedselzekerheid en innovatieve landbouw, maar geen boeren. We willen minder regels, maar de overheid blijft maar groeien. We willen mobiliteit, maar laten onze infrastructuur verslechteren. We willen energieonafhankelijk zijn, maar geen eigen gaswinning.
En nu dreigen we met box 3, bovenop al doorgeslagen wetgeving, ook ondernemers, investeerders en cryptobedrijven weg te jagen.
Het gebrek aan visie zal deze generatie politici nog lang worden nagedragen.
Pfizer-DNA gevonden in harttumor van jonge man na vaccinatie: 'Dit is de smoking gun' https://t.co/pmwu33zLr0
Even snel gescreend. Belangwekkend artikel. Dit is voor mij echter de crux van het verhaal, omdat ik dit al heel lang vermoed. En ik zeg het heel voorzichtig - dit zou ook de oorzaak kunnen zijn voor de waarneming van velen over de zogenaamde 'turbo-kankers'.
Strikt genomen betekent het aantonen van plasmide DNA in een tumor nog niet dat dit ook de oorzaak is van het ontstaan van de tumor. Ik denk dat de relatie tussen vaccinatie met een #mRNAvaccin en het ontstaan cq progressie van een tumor veel complexer is. En dat vatten @NicHulscher et al. heel mooi samen:
"The more parsimonious interpretation of this discrepancy is therefore not that mRNA vaccination initiated this malignancy de novo, but that a small, occult and clinically silent sarcoma was already present at the time of vaccination and that its growth and metastatic behavior were then drastically accelerated."
"A lesion of that size may have been undetectable by any available means, and might have remained indolent, been contained by immune surveillance, or never become clinically manifest."
"This is the phenotype the concurrent-hit model predicts: not a uniform excess of new cancers, but accelerated progression and metastatic outgrowth in susceptible hosts, including those carrying dormant micrometastases or occult residual disease."
On this account the relevant mechanisms are those of tumor promotion rather than initiation: sustained inflammation, impaired immune surveillance, immune tolerance associated with IgG4 class switching, and the structural genomic instability documented in tissue following mRNA vaccination.
"This framework accords with the population-level data, in which excess cancer risk was detectable within a single year of vaccination — an interval far too short for the initiation of most solid tumors, but fully compatible with the acceleration of pre-existing subclinical disease — and it is the mechanism proposed for the rapid post-vaccination malignancies catalogued elsewhere."
De mRNA-vaccins: the gift that keeps on giving.
Will mass migration be the death of the West? It doesn't have to be, but we have to act now. In this documentary, we explain what is happening, who is behind it, and most importantly…what can be done.
FULL DOCUMENTARY 👇
Lots of people discuss immigration & crime in Europe, so I compiled what I think is ALL the data on the topic, which is hard because many countries hide it.
Do they commit more crime?
Is it because of age? Sex? Education? Poverty? Culture?
1. Sexual offenses & violent crime:
This post looks like the start of a VERY sophisticated and well-funded PR operation to get support for Democrats to regulate AI into oblivion. Let me show you how it works:
1.) This guy, with minimal followers and no previous account activity, goes to the Wall Street Journal which publishes an exclusive with quotes from him on his resignation 18 minutes BEFORE this post goes up. Planning was clearly done in advance.
2.) Within hours, it has tens of thousands of reposts and the account has 100k+ followers. The post is punchy, quotable, it almost seems professionally written. The first three accounts to quote tweet it all do so within 15 minutes of the initial posting. Remember, this account had basically zero engagement beforehand, so an organic reach explanation seems unlikely.
According to Grok those accounts are @_NathanCalvin (General Counsel at Encode AI), @peterwildeford (Head of Policy at the AI Policy Network), and @DKokotajlo (Head of the AI Futures Project), all of which are up-and-coming AI-Doomer policy advocacy nonprofits.
The AI Futures Project website says it is funded “primarily” by the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which says on its own website that it has advised Jaan Tallinn, Skype creator and one of the leading investors in Anthropic, to grant over $2.5 million to the AI Futures Project since 2024.
Encode AI says on its website that it is ALSO funded by the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which in turn says that it told Anthropic investor Jaan Tallinn to grant $516,000 to Encode AI in 2025.
And wouldn’t you know it, the Survival and Flourishing Fund ALSO says it told Jaan Tallinn to grant $2 million to the AI Policy Institute, the 501(c)(3) affiliate of the AI Policy Network, as well.
What are the odds that the first three quote tweets of Coxon’s post would all be major AI-restriction policy advocates funded generously by the same donor, who also happens to be one of the leading investors in, and a board member of, Anthropic, the company Coxon was resigning from? And all within 15 minutes of posting (two within ten)?
3.) Jacob Coxon doesn’t have much of a resume, but we do know that, in 2022, he got a $20,159 scholarship for the “long term future scholarship program” from the Good Ventures Foundation, one of the philanthropic vehicles of Dustin Moskovitz, a notorious AI-doomer who has spent tens if not hundreds of millions on policy advocacy to strictly regulate AI, while also being an Anthropic Investor himself.
It also just so happens that the 14th person to quote Coxon’s post was @MaxNadeau_ (27 minutes after posting) who is the program officer for the Technical AI Safety team at Coefficient Giving, another of Moskovitz’s philanthropic spending vehicles. Max is not a frequent poster, his last posts before quoting Coxon were before Labor Day, but he was remarkably quick off the mark for this one.
4.) Basically every major Democrat politician and candidate has suddenly glommed on to this post, and conveniently, as the people cry out foe answers, Bernie Sanders already has a bill written to “ban super intelligence” and regulate AI into oblivion, and will be releasing later this week. The bill, among many other things, will create “a new cabinet-level federal agency to safeguard the public from the dangers of artificial intelligence” that will be “advised by an Artificial Intelligence Advisory Board comprised of experts on artificial intelligence.” Do you think, perhaps, Anthropic and its many investors who fund AI policy advocacy might have interest in getting to place a pet “expert” on the board of an entity that dictates what AI is and isn’t allowed to do? And isn’t it fortuitous that this whistleblower came forward with his oh-so scary stories so close in proximity to the release of the most radical piece of AI legislation ever introduced?
As I had mentioned before, Daszak and Koopmans flew together back to Amsterdam after their Wuhan 2021 mission.
They were so happy with the results.
🥳 Mission accomplished! Watch the video.
👉🏻 The same Koopmans who, with Fouchier, sank Proximal Origin review at Nature because it still mentioned passaging (a big no-no for GoF Fouchier).
👉🏻 The same Daszak who sent his stupid anonymous letter to Cohen at Science, to cut down the (new) wings of the P.O. authors as they opposed his GVP, by now his best funding chance.
These people are still walking free.
https://t.co/vSVqEQuHDj
Court documents reveal emails between a senior US health official and British scientist Peter Daszak, including plans to work “behind the scenes” to counter the theory that Covid leaked from a Wuhan laboratory.
Daszak also sent the official wine, thanking him for his “behind the scenes shenanigans” and promising further gifts.
Read the full story 👇
https://t.co/iXrzF4Ryzv