Brigadier🇬🇧

Lover of valleys

[Brigadier🇬🇧 @AngloBrigadier]

Legit the best thing about nato is they give cool names to Russian military equipment

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

I have been married for 40 years now - four children, two grandchildren. The best decision was ever made was building our family. It is an appalling shame that so many British men and women feel unable to do the same for reasons outside of their control. My generation has spectacularly failed them all. We need to own up to that, and we need to fix it.

There is finally a pro-family political party that will reverse so much of the damage done - Restore Britain.

How?

Tax breaks for parents. Let working men and women keep more of what they earn to spend how they choose. This is THE most important policy above all else. Merge tax allowances for married couples. Trust families to spend their money, not the Government.

A Restore Britain Government will front-load child benefit. Pay more in the earlier years when the help is needed. Wouldn’t cost a penny, but would mean that parents get help when they really need it buying prams, cots, nappies etc.

This would be exclusively for British children with one or two British parents.

Widen VAT exemptions for child-related items, and expand tax-deductible childcare costs.

Reducing tax obviously helps, but we need more - Restore Britain would make childcare fully tax deductible. All hours.

Regulation should be eased so that ratios aren’t so strict, with more children per adult allowed. Encourage youngsters into childcare with proper bursaries, apprenticeships and so on. Tax incentives for more nurseries/pre-schools.

Foreign children with foreign parents would not be eligible for free childcare paid for by the taxpayer.

If a healthy Brit is on benefits and refuses to work? They will not receive free childcare. You’ve got the time, look after your child. Working parents should be given the help. Not the healthy indolent.

The two-child cap would be reinstated.

If you want more children but can’t be bothered to work? That’s your problem, not the taxpayer.

Restore Britain will abolish stamp duty for British families (full policy coming soon). Priority on social housing lists. No foreign national families in social housing would free up an enormous amount of space for British men and women to build their family.

Restore Britain would overhaul spousal visas - British citizens should be able to raise their families in Britain with a foreign spouse, without being treated like criminals by the Home Office. This would be alongside the ‘red list’ to crush fraud. That is positive immigration, and should be welcomed. Restore Britain will welcome it.

IVF and fertility treatment. There should be proper investment in helping those who struggle to have children naturally. Not brutally rationed as it currently is. More rounds, more chances. This would not be offered to the entire third world as it is now - it would all be funded by simply not doing that.

A Restore Britain Government would allow parents to take their children out of school for a limited number of term-time days per year, as the parents see fit. If the child is developing well, that is a decision for the parents. A small change that will save families thousands...

Restore Britain stands with the young British men and women who want to build a family.

Most importantly, our wider plan of restoration will give them the confidence they need to have children, to bring them into the world. On tax, deportations, crime. Everything. It all needs to change to restore belief. That is our objective.

Our plan will make a family possible for millions more British men and women - this is how we Restore Britain.

[Politics UK @PolitlcsUK]

🚨 NEW: Mohammed Fahir Amaaz and Muhammad Amaad have been cleared over the alleged assault of a male police officer at Manchester Airport

Two juries failed to reach a verdict and no further trial will take place

[Index @lndexium]

i spent Time on this please don't hurt me

[Brigadier🇬🇧 @AngloBrigadier]

@TimeForReform29 @RestoreBritain_ @KingEddiexxxvii

[Stakeholder Consultant @echetus]

“Police arrest man bleeding to death because the killer accused him of being racist” is too absurd. We’re all living Tommy Robinson gear-induced fever dream. He’ll wake up soon and it’ll still be 2008.

[Leonid @politbureaucrat]

Starmer getting aura on here after being hated all this time shows how deeply people yearn for fascism

[Sophie ☥ @sophiemeaden]

Derek got in, guys

[Will 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @anglofuturist]

Just took 93-year-old mum to vote, she's registered blind. In a loud voice, she said, "which box for deporting all those fucking foreigners?" A cheer went up from waiting voters.

#LocalElections #LocalElections2026 #ElectionDay

[max tempers @maxtempers]

The largest supermarket in Britain, that operates on razor-thin margins, is about to be crushed for the crime of paying different jobs different salaries, while our legislature shrugs.

How dare they suggest that “so-called market rates” can exist in Soviet Britain.

[Brigadier🇬🇧 @AngloBrigadier]

@KingEddiexxxvii Lovely abbot

[Restore Britain @RestoreBritain]

Restore Britain's Energy Philosophy.

Restore Britain’s forthcoming energy paper sets out the steps for ensuring cheap and abundant energy at home.

This project is three months in the making and consistent with our track record of producing well-researched, in-depth papers for the good British public to scrutinise.

As for our imminent energy policy document, we present a short teaser below...

At Restore Britain, we believe that energy is the lifeblood of any developed first-world economy. First and foremost, then, it should be cheap, reliable, and scalable.

If that means investment in fossil fuels, as right now it does, then so be it. Affordable energy makes nations rich and rich nations are better equipped than poor nations to tackle any environmental challenges.

Overall, energy should be valued as strategic national infrastructure, not treated as an environmental compliance problem. We also believe that it must serve our security needs. In the modern world, national sovereignty means nothing if it is not backed by energy independence.

The future we envision is one of self-confident nuclear expansion, full exploitation of our offshore oil and gas reserves, onshore shale development where feasible, and some limited role for renewables – albeit without subsidies, competing on their own merits – as part of a balanced grid mix.

These should meet our energy demands at a rate affordable to British households and British businesses.

On its own, though, this is not enough to make energy cheap, plentiful, and thus restore Britain to prosperity.

We will also need to embark upon a mass removal of our binding Net Zero commitments, the vast majority of which are smothering our economy to no worthwhile end. Even if we were to opt for a ‘full steam ahead’ strategy on oil, gas, and nuclear right away, energy prices would not come down unless we first took aim at the structural issues caused by the Net Zero cult.

We would repeal the lot.

The debate now raging about energy bills shows that the British people are struggling. Ultimately, though, what we need is more a long-term vision for national flourishing than eye-catching measures aimed at temporary relief.

The ability to build is also vital. A nation may possess a capable population, plentiful resources, and cutting-edge technological know-how, but if it cannot turn these inputs into power plants, transmission lines, factories, housing, ports, railways, and data centres, then that nation’s economic potential remains unrealised. Our practical approach proceeds from two major principles.

First, strategic infrastructure must be treated as a matter of national capability rather than ordinary planning disputes. We would work to ensure that approval timelines are measured in months, not years.

Second, regulatory frameworks must be cut back and simplified. An alarming number of delays arise not from environmental or health and safety protection itself, but from overlapping layers of approval, consultation, and litigation that cause projects to stall for indefinite periods on end.

OIL & GAS

Unless we reverse course, Britain will soon be the only country in Europe with a windfall tax on oil and gas profits still in force, scaring off investment and undermining our energy needs. Instead, we would impose no more than the standard 25% corporation tax, not the effective 78% grabbed by the Treasury at present. Right now, the incentives around even the small amount of drilling that is permitted are extremely forbidding. In the year ending July 2024, the average rate of return for offshore operators stood at a pitiful net -1%.

Our aim, by contrast, is to foster a predictable environment that rewards risk-taking investors, creates proper jobs, and deepens valuable skill-pools. We intend to preserve Aberdeen in particular as a crucial node in the oil and gas sector. On current trends, the local economy of North East Scotland and the national economy of Britain as a whole is threatened by Ed Miliband’s lunatic, ideologically driven pursuit of Net Zero at all costs.

But we would also level with the British public. There are no overnight solutions to the way in which we have been so woefully misgoverned in recent decades, including on matters related to energy. We would not hesitate to build new coal-fired power plants as part of an interim strategy to transition to more reliable long-term sources. The major advantage of such plants is that, as well as being dispatchable, they can be up and running within a shorter timeframe (roughly three to four years) than new gas turbines. As both China and Germany have shown, modern techniques also make coal far less of a pollutant than it used to be. Last of all, there is plenty of it – particularly the cleanest and densest anthracite and bituminous varieties – across the British Isles.

NUCLEAR

We would turn our efforts, too, towards a nationwide nuclear renaissance, in particular building an extensive fleet of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs). Cutting-edge SMR designs boast a range of virtues. They are powerful enough to meet the needs of a small- to medium-sized town, but nimble enough to do so without much notice. The Rolls-Royce SMRs, for instance, require an overall site footprint of fewer than 10 acres. Contrary to larger projects like Sizewell C and Hinkley Point C, they are also easier to finance privately and with minimal, if any, state funds.

The major problem for all nuclear power projects, however, remains burdensome overregulation. We shall therefore expand on the work of the regulatory taskforce already commissioned by the Labour government.

The brief of our taskforce would be to eliminate all forms of duplication across every level of our existing regulatory framework, from environmental impact assessments to planning hurdles. As part of an interim strategy between where we find ourselves today and the ultimate goal of simplifying our regulatory system along the lines of foreign success stories like France and South Korea, we would not hesitate to overrule the regulator by automatic repeal of any laws or regulations that it cites to block standardised designs safely in operation elsewhere in the developed world.

OFFSHORE WIND

Offshore wind turbines are remote enough to be non-despoiling to natural beauty, to require no land competition, and though intermittent by nature, can work hand in glove with natural gas as a more reliable substitute whenever the wind fails to blow. Our ultimate aim is to be energy independent, but since that cannot occur instantly and we are already committed to buy whatever our windfarms generate, we may as well make the most of it. Between now and where we aspire to take Britain, we are bound to find ourselves in a position where, while longer term forms of dispatchable power are built, we shall need some wind.

FRACKING

In the same way that lifting the ban on North Sea oil and gas exploration would be a priority under a Restore Britain government, so too would re-examining the opportunities presented by shale gas.

The obstacles in our case are state-imposed constraints on new well developments, a moratorium on fracking reimposed by Rishi Sunak in October 2022, and onerous taxes on oil and gas companies.

The irony is that fracking, though demonised for causing tremors, is far less seismically disruptive than the geothermal wells in Cornwall so often lauded by the very activists who despise shale exploration.

Once the ban is lifted, the regulations would be rewritten to establish a level playing field between the fracking sector and the geothermal sector, which for arbitrary, unjust, and counter-productive reasons is less burdened.

CAUSE FOR HOPE

We note with excitement the fact that Britain possesses substantial domestic energy resources and the technical capacity to develop them.

What has been lacking is the political will to prioritise cheap, abundant, and reliable energy over costly, ideologically driven climate targets. Removing the self-destructive Net Zero system, reforming planning and regulation to enable timely construction, and restoring a pragmatic balance between oil and gas, nuclear, hydrocarbons, and unsubsidised renewables would allow markets and private investment to deliver the abundance required for affordable energy and national restoration.

Victorian Britain relied on cheap power and clean water to drive the Industrial Revolution. Nothing fundamental has changed. We have an abundance of both. A self-confident drive for increased energy production at home would boost government revenue from corporation and employment taxes, while reducing our exposure to global shocks and our reliance on foreign imports.

Restoring Britain’s energy security will not be without transitional challenges, but the alternative is continued adherence to policies that have produced some of Europe’s highest energy prices. A patriotic energy policy must place the interests of the British people first.

Our full paper will be published very soon indeed.

[Brigadier🇬🇧 @AngloBrigadier]

Boomers often forget that they are the ones who implemented health and safety rules. I don’t remember having a say in what I did in PE because I was a CHILD.

[Pogobär @trollpunk69]

Wir sind früher einfach an die Hallendecke geklettert, ohne Klettergurt und Sicherungsleine und auch ohne Fangnetz etc.
Generation Z würde schon beim Gedanken daran der Dünnschiss unten aus der Jogginghose laufen.

[Dominic Cummings @Dominic2306]

No, it stands for English civilisation winning.

You stand for putting treacherous lawyers who collaborate with criminals in charge of lawfare against the SAS.

A future regime will jail your mate Hermer and RICO through your network

RETWEET IF AGREE

[Brigadier🇬🇧 @AngloBrigadier]

So true @Haggis_UK !!!

[Haggis_UK 🇬🇧 🇪🇺 @Haggis_UK]

Dennis Skinner(2012) - "Doesn't it prove the prove the theory that when posh boys are in trouble, they sack the servants" #PartyGate

[Brigadier🇬🇧 @AngloBrigadier]

>Raise minimum wage because cost of living
>all companies employing low skill employees have to raise prices
>cost of living increases
>repeat

God it’s so tiresome

[Brigadier🇬🇧 @AngloBrigadier]

Idea: means test pension by tax contributions of your own children (obvious caveats for those unable to give birth or serious disabilities etc.)
Discuss!

[Brigadier🇬🇧 @AngloBrigadier]

@MinxGenie @AC1419872 @juneslater17 And yet you still feel entitled to a government benefit scheme paid for by the current working generation? A generation that’s much smaller than yours because your lot were too selfish to have kids

[Alex Cox @AlrxCox]

The triple lock is honestly one of the worst policies ever thought of.

Many of the people who say the benefits bill is too high are the ones making up 48% of it.

That’s £150.7 billion so people who had the easiest housing ladder, the best savings rates and the best private pension rates can get a bigger pension than they ever paid in for.

It’s a joke of a policy and I wholeheartedly disagree with it.

[Brigadier🇬🇧 @AngloBrigadier]

Pensioners have to pay IHT on their estate when they’re dead?!?! Bloody young people inheriting these estates don’t know how good they have it!

[Paul Andrews @vanillaweb]

@tomhfh @andywattoes @AnnabelDenham1 65% of pensioners are still paying income tax 5 million at higher rate , they also pay vat and council tax and their estate gets clobbered for IHT when they pop their clogs