AnneBowling

[Sall Grover @salltweets]

“…the judges adopted the terms used by Tickle: misgender, c!sgender & transgender. None of these terms appear in the SDA [law] and Grover rejected the validity of such terms. The judges justified the use of these terms as being “convenient”…”

[Sama Hoole @SamaHoole]

This year the Home Office moved to stop expert sheep shearers from Australia and New Zealand coming to shear British sheep.

The people who keep the animals comfortable were declared surplus to requirements.

For over a decade, around 75 of the best shearers on earth have flown in each spring on a simple visa concession. In a few brutal weeks they take the wool off up to two million sheep.

A top shearer clears a ewe in two or three minutes. Hundreds a day. Calm hands, no panic in the animal. It is a global trade and a young body's game, and Britain has never grown enough of its own.

The official line? Fourteen years to train Britons, so the door is closing.

Here is what that tidy sentence ignores. A sheep must be shorn every year or she overheats, cannot move properly, and gets eaten alive by flies and maggots. Shearing on time is welfare, plain and simple, written into law and into the animal's own skin.

So a government that lectures farmers without pause about welfare has quietly made the most basic welfare task harder to carry out. After the outcry they allowed one "final" year. Then the experts are gone for good.

A sector already losing money on every fleece, already burning wool it cannot sell, now told it cannot even get the people in to take the wool off.

You could be forgiven for thinking somebody wants the British sheep gone.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

@tim_cook Don’t want it.

Either stop this creepy spyware or all Apple devices will be banned from the premises of my companies.

[Kate Hoey @CatharineHoey]

My article in the Daily Mail 2 days ago

[Freyja1 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇸🇯🇩🇪🇮🇪🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 @FreyjaBakke]

Inam Khan groomed a 14-year-old girl in Suffolk and a 12-year-old girl in Sussex.. both on Snapchat. Both children. Both alone when he found them.

He drove from Northamptonshire to Suffolk to rape the 14-year-old.

Then, while on bail, he drove to Sussex and abducted the 12-year-old. Drove approximately 600 miles across two trips to get to her.

Convicted of rape, attempted rape, abduction and sexual assault. Jailed for 19 years at Hove Crown Court.

He was on bail when he abducted the second child.

On. Bail.

A man already charged with raping a child was granted bail and used that freedom to abduct another one. How many times does this have to happen before the system changes? #grooming #predator #awareness #share

[Samantha Smith @SamanthaTaghoy]

Remember how Labour has spent the past two years calling everyone racist for worrying about asylum seeker crime rates?

Well, the Ministry of Justice just admitted that asylum seekers are committing crimes at a higher rate than all other migrants.

Bangladesh, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran, and Eritrea have been identified as the most common countries of origin AND the highest crime rates by nationality.

Starmer and Co. never usually miss a chance to promise they’ll “punish criminals to the fullest extent of the law.”

But they seem to be keeping rather quiet this time…

…Funny, that.

[Julia Hartley-Brewer @JuliaHB1]

Just so you know who this man is, @ZackPolanski believes that someone smashing a sledgehammer into a police woman's back is legitimate and justifiable "direct action".

When people tell you who they are, believe them.

[AnneBowling @AnneBowling]

If only some of that were for Defence.
Or Border control.
Or Educating our children.
Or the NHS, housing, roads ...

[GB News @GBNEWS]

‘Taxpayers would be horrified to know how many charities they are funding that perpetuate the open borders we have effectively got in the UK.’

Founder of ‘Woke Waste’, Charlotte Gill, says she’s calculated that £660 million of taxpayers’ money is going to migration charities.

[Kellie-Jay Keen @ThePosieParker]

How many stabbings are attempted beheadings without camera footage?

If the authorities were on our side we would know. However, they’re aren’t, so it’s a question.

[Graham Linehan @Glinner]

I've learned so much about being a man from watching Elliot. I've learned that real men are 5'1", always look like they're on the verge of weeping, and sound like kazoos because their vocal cords are suddenly too large for their necks.

[Rafe Heydel-Mankoo @RafHM]

What is playing out now with the Belfast attack, with Henry Nowak, is a grand symphony of gaslighting & dishonesty that is almost too stomach-churning to watch

We witnessed the same after Southport, with the rape gangs....and on & on

They KNOW their mass migration ideology caused these atrocities. So they choose to deflect on to right-wing politicians, GB News and what they call the "far right".

The public need to understand exactly how their game is played and the poisonous ideology that underpins it.

The cycle is always the same:

Fury erupts across Britain, driven not by public figures (as they claim), but by the atrocity itself. You know, the mad asylum seeker wielding a bloodied knife...

Footage is shared on social media, watched with our own eyes. The pure unvarnished truth that the legacy media can't spin.

Figures on the right respond with natural fury - indeed, rage - that the elite's callous disregard for reality and their fellow citizens has yet again unleashed carnage.

But the media and the political class can't talk about that reality. They can't talk about the incident itself. Because they would have to admit it is thanks to them that such people - such murderers - have entered the country.

The BBC, The Guardian, Sky News, Labour, the Greens, the Lib Dems & many Tories, too --

What THEY CHOOSE to talk about, what they WANT YOU TO THINK the real story is about, is the anger and the choice of words of those of us who are utterly appalled and outraged by the latest atrocity -- an atrocity THEY enabled.

This is gaslighting propaganda of the most repellent and unforgivable kind.

With Southport, the real story was apparently not the son of a Rwandan refugee committing one of the most heinous crimes in British history.

No, the real story was Nigel Farage's reaction to that orgy of slaughter against little girls. When locals rioted, James O'Brien and others labelled it the 'Farage Riots'.

The small number of rioters suddenly became the story, used to dismiss the concerns of ALL protestors. "Far-right thuggery", was how Keir Starmer referred to law-abiding mothers and pensioners.

Anything to avoid talking about the crime itself and the ideology that brought its perpetrator into our country.

And now we see the same playing out with the Belfast attack and the murder of Henry Nowak.

Newsnight misleadingly quoted Nigel Farage as saying "white rage," a revealing and vile smear for which they have had to apologise yet again.

In lockstep, the media and political class rapidly converged on their narrative: this was to be a story about Nigel Farage's naughty words.

THIS is what has dominated their coverage.
This is what they want to talk about in Parliament, in the TV studios, and in the press. Farage's naughty words.

"Just how naughty were they? Should such bad words be tolerated? Should he be arrested?"
"Do we need to apply yet more censorship to protect the public against his mean, hurty words?"

These people are so far beneath contempt it is difficult to find words that do them justice.

This is a story not about Nigel Farage or the right, but the deeply ingrained anti-British and anti-white ideology that is destroying this nation.

This is an institutionally treasonous state, and Henry Novak and Stephen Ogilvie are its latest victims.

That is the real story our political and media class are attempting to bury under a mountain of pearl-clutching theatrics, lies, and misdirection.

They have blood on their hands. It's about time we said it.

Clip from my monologue. 👇
Full monologue linked in the second post. 1/2

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

The Lord Chancellor's Department Just Published A Diversity Strategy. The Government's Own Guidance Says It's Unlawful.

David Lammy is the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice. He is constitutionally responsible for the independence of the judiciary and the rule of law in England and Wales. On 11th June 2026 his department published its Public Appointments Diversity and Outreach Strategy. Nick Timothy MP has written to him asking him to publish the legal advice behind it. He should.

The strategy sets an expectation that at least 90 percent of campaigns achieve demonstrable diversity on sift and interview panels, with panel selection informed by the current diversity of the board and any representation gaps. A panel is considered diverse where data shows representation of more than one sex, or at least one declared ethnic minority or disabled panel member. Any exceptions require documented justification and quarterly senior oversight.

The Equality Act permits positive action only in narrow circumstances. It must address a documented disadvantage, different needs, or disproportionately low participation. The department's own figures show 57 percent of its 2024 to 2025 appointments were women. That is a majority, not underrepresentation. The 12 percent ethnic minority figure is compared against 17 percent of the economically active population, but that is not the correct benchmark. The correct benchmark is the pool of qualified candidates, not the population as a whole.

The Government's own Equalities Office guidance is explicit. Creating schemes to benefit those with a particular protected characteristic, without evidence that the group is at a disadvantage or has different needs, is listed as an example of unlawful discrimination. So is requiring places reserved for those with particular protected characteristics on interview panels. The Ministry of Justice strategy appears to do both.

This is not a new position for Lammy. In 2019 he hosted a Labour conference event with Shami Chakrabarti specifically advocating time limited quotas for judicial diversity. The Lord Chief Justice responded at the time that such quotas are not compatible with appointment on merit nor, ultimately, in sustaining public confidence in the judiciary. Lammy is now implementing from the office of Lord Chancellor a policy the most senior judge in the country said would undermine confidence in judicial independence.

The stated 2028 target is a measurable reduction in the representation gap for underrepresented groups, moving the appointee profile toward the diversity profile of the UK economically active population. That is not a description of merit based selection. It is a description of demographic engineering with a deadline.

This sits within the same DEI framework documented across British institutions this week. The Sussex Police book club on inner white supremacy. The NHS pressure not to section black patients. The Hampshire Race Action Plan. Each implements SDG 10.2 and 10.3, the United Nations Agenda 2030 commitments to inclusion and reduced inequalities of outcome, adopted by Britain in 2015 without a single vote. The Ministry of Justice strategy is that same architecture applied to the department responsible for the rule of law itself.

If the Lord Chancellor's own department believes its diversity quota is lawful, the legal advice supporting that view should be published. If no such advice exists, that is the more serious problem. Either way, the department charged with upholding the law owes the public an answer.

"Lammy is now implementing from the office of Lord Chancellor a policy the most senior judge in the country said would undermine confidence in judicial independence."

[Patrick Christys @PatrickChristys]

One of them smashed a police officer’s spine with a hammer

[Julia Hartley-Brewer @JuliaHB1]

A Prime Minister who cannot or will not do what is necessary to defend our national security is not fit for the job.

My column for @TheSun on the Defence Secretary's shock resignation. ⬇️ https://t.co/gypZMYP61Z

[Annunziata Rees-Mogg @zatzi]

McSweeney, it would seem, never really left.

A payoff, a holiday, and a new post with his old boss.

Wonder if his new job came with a phone?

[AnneBowling @AnneBowling]

@churchofengland
@bishopSarahM

[Mr Patel 🕉️ @Patelindianlion]

From Christian Homes to Slave Markets: 4.5 Million African Christians Brutally Enslaved in 2026:

While the world keeps obsessing over slavery from centuries ago, millions of Christians are being kidnapped, bought, and sold right now in Africa yet almost no one is talking about it.

Africa has 7 million people trapped in modern slavery.

4.5 million of them are Christians.

Among the victims: 2.4 million Christian women & girls
1 million Christian children

An average slave is sold for just $90.

Worst affected Christian populations: Nigeria: 1.611 million slaves (45-50% Christian)

DR Congo: 407,000 slaves (90-95% Christian)

South Sudan: 115,000 slaves (60-70% Christian)

These are Christian believers people who follow Jesus, read the Bible, and live their faith being ripped from their homes and communities into forced labor, sexual slavery, and horrific exploitation

Why is there endless discussion about historical slavery, but complete silence on this massive ongoing Christian slavery crisis in 2026 ?

Christian lives are under attack today.

It’s time to break the silence and demand attention for this tragedy.

[John Cleese @JohnCleese]

What about a ban on beheading ?

[American AF 🇺🇸 @iAnonPatriot]

One country allowed millions of low IQ migrants to flood in, while the other didn’t.

Be like Poland.

[Matt Goodwin @GoodwinMJ]

I am not going to share the video but once again another horrific atrocity has occurred in the UK.

I am so sick & tired of this — like MILLIONS of others.

We are losing our country.
https://t.co/p1gSxH6Yq1

[Claire Adams @claire_adams694]

Well, here goes.

My first ever GB News interview.

I’ve never done television before, so be gentle.
A few years ago I was working quietly in the background in welfare, safeguarding and security investigations.

Public speaking, media interviews and politics were never part of the plan. A series of events simply led me here.

I watched it back and, like most people, picked apart everything I think I could have said better. That’s part of learning.

I’m still finding my feet, but I’m grateful for the opportunity and proud to be speaking up for the issues that matter to me.

Onwards and upwards.@fionagoddarduk