@StevePaul63@RachelD1892 And it's been revealed that BlueSky has people lurking with "M.A.P." in their profiles. Keeping our kids safe? This is looking extremely sinister....
If Starmer wants to "keep children safe", why has he exempted a forum where people with "M.A.P." in their profiles, lurk? For God's sake, someone challenge him over this in the next PMQs. This is deeply sinister.
Starmer is a tyrannical digital dictator.
He’s literally putting children’s education in a digital gulag.
The benefits outweigh the negatives for children on social media.
Look, during the pandemic, the kids used social media platforms for education, the reason Starmer has exempted @BlueSky, which happens to be left-leaning.
What does that say?
@consumer_common@RachelD1892 Shocking to discover that in exempting Bluesky, Starmer is directing children straight to a forum that includes people with M.A.P. in their profiles 🤢🤮. Really hope someone calls this out at the next PMQs.
Jeremy Clarkson says the government’s reported plan to impose a 9pm social media curfew on 16 and 17 yr olds makes no sense.
“You don’t trust them to be on social media after 9pm, yet you’re happy for them to vote. How does that work? Am I taking crazy pills?” Clarkson asked.
If Keir Starmer was banning social media for the safety of our children he wouldn’t be picking & choosing which sites they can access.
The fact he won’t be banning “blue sky” which is a Leftie platform proves it.
He just wants our kids to see what he wants them to see.
This man can never be trusted.
Labour blocked age verification for illegal migrants claiming to be children.
Now they want British citizens to verify their age to prove they’re not children.
Can you see we are being played?
Two-tier system in action — protect the invaders, control the natives.
This government is at war with its own people. 🇬🇧
(image courtesy of @Artemisfornow)
Bluesky is absolutely full of accounts proudly calling themselves “minor attracted persons” — pedophiles.
Starmer conveniently left it off the under-16s social media ban list.
This was NEVER about protecting children.
It’s about funnelling kids to degeneracy while censoring truth.
Starmer is a disgrace.
Ban the lot. Protect our kids. 🇬🇧
(images courtesy of @BROKENBRITAIN0)
How does Starmer explain how allowing kids to access BlueSky is ok but not all the others
Starmer is a SNAKE
None of this is about doing what's right for kids
#ShutUpStarmer
Keir Starmer says a majority voted against child access to social media so he’ll ban it for “the safety of our children.” A majority voted against Labour. So Starmer must also ban Labour for “the safety of our nation”
Why when we are in Summer..
Is there no blue sky and no sun to be seen every single morning
And again
If you think this is natural, why would the U.K. Gov announce they are the ones to trial solar dimming ?
Digital ID and digital currency is about total control over every aspect of your life and coercive power over your actions in real time. That's all its about. "Security" and "safety" is how it is being sold to the public. The generation that brings it in will be the last generation to experience freedom. At least the semblance of freedom we have now.
So let me get this ABSOLUTELY straight…
The public are being told facial recognition cameras, Digital ID and eventually digital currency are all about “security” and “safety”.
Meaning every payment, every document and every movement could one day be linked directly back to YOU.
But here’s the part hardly anyone talks about…
MPs and members of the Royal Family are reportedly exempt from parts of Digital ID systems for “security reasons”.
So the very people creating and supporting these systems won’t necessarily have to live under them in the same way as everyone else.
Ordinary people could end up being monitored through one vast digital network, while those at the top remain outside parts of it.
Whether you support Digital ID or oppose it, surely the same rules should apply to everyone.
Because the moment people believe there is one set of rules for MPs, the Royal Family and the political class, and another for everybody else, trust in government starts to disappear.
And looking around Britain today, it’s not hard to see why so many people are losing faith.
The real issue isn’t technology. It’s whether the people creating the system are willing to live under it themselves and if they aren’t then WHY and WHY should anyone else be expected to then.
@Hepworthclare@ShakeLS Couldn't agree more. Kate seems extremely imperious and indignant that her "subjects" aren't on their knees. My God. Deeply unpleasant to witness.
Keir Starmer directed our Armed Forces to intercept an Oil Tanker in the English Channel this morning & was successful.
This shows & tells us Keir Starmer could stop the small boats if he wanted to but it he just doesn’t want to.
We are being lied to on a massive scale.
Keir Starmer: "We don't have £4.5 billion for defence."
Keir Starmer the next day: "I’m announcing £4.5 billion for more cycle lanes and zebra crossings."
He’s just reached the point where he’s just laughing at us all now.
You really couldn't make it up.
The sheer scale of this intervention is staggering - Miliband under the guise of saving the planet, is launching market controls to ban more than a third of “space heating systems”from British shops.
The Telegraph has the details..
“Ed Miliband will ban the sale of underfloor heating systems deemed to be using too much power in his latest net zero drive.
The Energy Secretary has also set his sights on electric towel rails, gas fires and storage heaters, with plans for new market controls designed to cut carbon emissions.
He wants to bring in new energy efficiency requirements that will result in more than a third of so-called “space heating systems” becoming illegal to sell”
Miliband plans to completely outlaw..
*48% of electric underfloor heating models
*Over 50% of electric towel rails
*Up to 27% of standard gas fires.
And what do we get out of this ?
The Government’s own impact assessments admit the average household will save a grand total of just £8 to £10 a year on energy bills.
Shadow Energy Secretary Claire Coutinho hit the nail on the head, calling it “Soviet-level intrusion” where the state dictates how long your towel rail can run.
Instead of fixing the grid or lowering baseline energy costs, the state is policing our bathroom floor.
Someone has to stop this mad man.