Observing The Anomaly

Focused on all-domain anomaly resolution. That includes UAP's, but is also open to any anomalous data.

[Observing The Anomaly @AnomalousData]

I just published Vacuum Balloon Technology May Be Closer Than You Think https://t.co/O1UfaiIy2z

[Observing The Anomaly @AnomalousData]

https://t.co/ByUqISizf4

[Observing The Anomaly @AnomalousData]

@JeremyCorbell IF there is something to my "shaped refractive index hypothesis" for your jellyfish UAP, then it falls to temperature, pressure, or the fabric of spacetime as the mechanism of action and it explains the apparent temperature changes as well as lack of night vision

[Observing The Anomaly @AnomalousData]

https://t.co/UnbjZ4edls

[Observing The Anomaly @AnomalousData]

I just published In 1946 The NYT Reported That There Is Uranium In Antarctica And That The British Took Over The US… https://t.co/FaVBiowcUn #Antarctica #History

[Observing The Anomaly @AnomalousData]

@blacktepez I covered all of this over a year ago.
https://t.co/SzwbfDdfhn

[Observing The Anomaly @AnomalousData]

@skwirrellmate I sent you an email detailing how I uncovered all of this over a year ago and published it.
https://t.co/SzwbfDdfhn

[Observing The Anomaly @AnomalousData]

@GregBetts1968 I was actually first to publish on all of this as you can see here
https://t.co/SzwbfDdfhn

[Observing The Anomaly @AnomalousData]

I just published Digging Into Antarctica: A Recent RAND Corp Document On The Reality Of Antarctica https://t.co/JWzavGpznl

[Observing The Anomaly @AnomalousData]

@GarryPNolan @that_ufo_chick @Cortex_Zero How porous is this sample and can the data here also map this?

[Observing The Anomaly @AnomalousData]

@korea_ufo Did you see my work or come to these conclusions independently? I like the infographic by the way. You've added a bit to my ideas.

[Observing The Anomaly @AnomalousData]

@TOEwithCurt Ask him about Ken Shoulders, EVOs, cold fusion, and Project SAFIRE. Specifically, how knowledgable he is on the subjects and why he seems reluctant to discuss them in any depth.

[Observing The Anomaly @AnomalousData]

https://t.co/z1Yps5qKnt

[Observing The Anomaly @AnomalousData]

Bjorn Ekeberg is spreading the awareness of challenges in science R&D #cosmology
https://t.co/XUWztpvymz

[Curt Jaimungal @TOEwithCurt]

Once upon a time, there was a community of physicists. This community believed, and had good reason to believe, that quantum mechanics, not classical mechanics, was the right framework in which to do physics. They also had a good understanding, at the classical level, of the dynamics of solid bodies.

But the physicists were sad, because they knew nothing at all about the microscopic structure of matter, and so they did not have a good quantum theory of vibrations in crystals or of other solid-matter dynamics.

So one day, they set out to quantize their classical theories of solid matter. At first, they tried to do it naively, by putting the classical theory into Hamiltonian form and replacing classical observables with self-adjoint operators. This worked quite well until higher-order terms were included.

But when the physicists tried to include those higher order terms, the theory became mathematically very badly behaved - calculations contained integrals that diverged to infinity.

Soon the physicists discovered that they could extract working calculational results if they just assumed that displacements couldn't vary on arbitrarily short length scales. This amounted to "cutting off" the range of integration in the divergent integrals, so that they got a finite result. When they did their calculations this way, the answers agreed very well with experiment.

But the physicists were still sad. "It's ad hoc", they said. "It's inelegant", they lamented. "It conflicts with the Euclidean symmetries of solid matter", they cried.

So they went back to basics, and looked for an axiomatized, fully rigorous quantum theory, with displacements definable on arbitrarily short length scales and with exact Euclidean symmetries.

And to this day, they are still looking...

[Observing The Anomaly @AnomalousData]

I just published A Sober Exploration Of Antarctica And UFO’s https://t.co/sHisgIlvYV #ufo #Antarctica https://t.co/sHisgIlvYV #ufo #antarctica @Eyes_OnTheSkies @JChurchRadio

[Observing The Anomaly @AnomalousData]

@TOEwithCurt You need to ask about Bob Greenyer and LENR research as well as about exotic vacuum objects (EVO's) and Ken Shoulders. See if he has any follow ups on SAFIRE, too. Don't get distracted by the "whistle blower" story and hone in on energy research

[Observing The Anomaly @AnomalousData]

I just published The Latest Developments in Nuclear and Space Technologies https://t.co/1LG0ts2keQ

[Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies @ExploreSCU]

UAP is an international issue and that’s why SCU’s virtual Anomalous Aerospace Phenomena Conference will have speakers from Sweden, Germany, Australia, Norway, France, Israel, Canada, New Zealand, and England. Register now https://t.co/JNLzhfOWYn

[Observing The Anomaly @AnomalousData]

I just published DOE Announces $10 Million in Funding to Projects Studying LENR https://t.co/6w2NhIo3VD