Ant

Ser humano.
Mujer: hembra humana adulta.
Trabajadora de palabras e imágenes.

[Ant @AntSosa]

@R3SCATEMOXH2O @GobCDMX @SEGIAGUA @ClaraBrugadaM RESPETO BÁSICO

[SOMOSAGUA RESCATEMOSAGUA @R3SCATEMOXH2O]

Lo dicho. La estrategia jurídica pro bono a cargo de L&RR sigue adelante. @GobCDMX escuchen y compartan, sin trampas, los resultados de los #estudios del #aguaContaminada, la situación real y su propuesta de remediación para la zona afectada. Cumplan la sentencia @SEGIAGUA

[Ant @AntSosa]

Perrito perdido en la colonia Florida, CDMX.
Pelo blanco, largo medio. Sin collar. Asustadizo.
Visto por última vez sobre Minerva.

[Alex George Pickering @AlexGPickering]

Indeed.

[César KMP 🇵🇸 @C354R23]

📍Esta es la historia de Hipólito Mora, creador de las autodefensas de Michoacán. Es la historia de una lucha legítima para defender al pueblo, llena de traiciones, asesinatos y conspiraciones del estado que terminó desembocando en la creación de nuevos cárteles.

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

Man: no definition needed.
Non-man (formerly known as woman):
a being definable only by reference to the male. An absence, a vacuum where there's no man-ness.

[Colin Wright @SwipeWright]

🚨 WHAT IS A WOMAN?

I found a book at a woke bookstore that actually defined "woman" and "man," and it's as sexist and regressive as many of us have been saying for years.

It's rare to see the concepts laid out and defined so clearly, as the true regressive nature of gender ideology likes to hide behind vague language.

Let's first look at how the book defines "gender" and "gender identity" before looking at how they define "woman" and "man."

The book says that "gender" is "A set of socially constructed associations with biological sex, such as behaviors, appearance, and social roles."

That's straightforward enough, though another way to say it would be sex-based stereotypes of masculinity and femininity.

The book defines "gender identity" as "How someone internally identifies with social gender constructs, regardless of their biological sex."

All right, so the sex-related stereotypical behaviors, appearance, and social roles a person feels the strongest affinity to.

Now what we've all been waiting for. The book defines "woman" as "Someone who identifies with the behaviors, presentations, and roles traditionally associated with the female sex." A "man" is defined as "Someone who identifies with the behaviors, presentations, and roles traditionally associated with the male sex."

What a shockingly clear admission of what many of us have been saying for years—gender ideology defines women and men according to whether one identifies with stereotypes of femininity and masculinity, respectively. Under this paradigm, there is no such thing as a masculine women or a feminine man, because masculine women are now considered men, and feminine men are now considered women by definition.

If you had any doubts about the regressive and sexist nature of gender ideology, which tells masculine women they're really men, and feminine men they're really women, I hope they have been vanquished.

[Diego Castro @diego_castro_a]

Hoy les traigo el hilo que nadie pidió: Doctrinas éticas y filosóficas como canciones de 31 minutos

[Ant @AntSosa]

@BalamRetiz Jajajajajaajajjaajjsajsjs

[Ant @AntSosa]

RT RT RT RT

[Guffo @guffocaballero]

Alguien por aquí describió muy chingón el fenómeno Peso Pluma y demás cantantes de corridos "tumbados" o "alterados". No se metió con que si cantan bien pinche feo o cantan puro mugrero; simplemente dijo: "Antes de idolatrarlos, recuerda que le cantan al poder".

[Ant @AntSosa]

@MrInfinitiAlpha @NessaTinu7 @stardixa @Roman_A6 De nuevo falacia por reducción de la parte por el todo. Neta aprende a argumentar sin recurrir a manipulación emocional y luego vuelves a intentar. Eso ya no funciona.

[Ant @AntSosa]

@MrInfinitiAlpha @NessaTinu7 @stardixa @Roman_A6 Sigue preguntando retóricamente y seguiré respondiendo de veras.

[Ant @AntSosa]

@MrInfinitiAlpha @NessaTinu7 @stardixa @Roman_A6 La inmutabilidad de los sexos es algo que reconocemos desde alrededor de los 4 años. En la mayoría de los casos es posible reconocer el sexo por los caracteres sexuales secundarios. Si no se pudiera reconocer el sexo, no existiría el concepto de "pasar".

[Ant @AntSosa]

@MrInfinitiAlpha @NessaTinu7 @stardixa @Roman_A6 Los tres puntos fueron porque la respuesta es obvia

[Ant @AntSosa]

@MrInfinitiAlpha @NessaTinu7 @stardixa @Roman_A6 ...sí

[Ant @AntSosa]

@MrInfinitiAlpha @NessaTinu7 @stardixa @Roman_A6 Sí