Apostle Magnus Seyi

Official account of Apostle Magnus Seyi. Apostle| Preacher| Teacher| Revivalist. Rebuilding Apostolic walls in partnership with the Holyghost @buildersintlch

[Apostle Magnus Seyi @ApostleMSO]

Jesus is the Son of God
Jesus is eternally of thesame essence as the Father and the Spirit
The Father, Son and Holyspirit are three distinct personalities united in one essence
God has the right to kill, the power to kill, and can kill according to His sovereignty

[Apostle Magnus Seyi @ApostleMSO]

Because the Bible is a christocentric material, the histories of God's dealing and activities on earth written down should be ignored. So, a document that cannot be trusted is where you place your own Christ?

[Michael Eyitayo @m_eyit]

Let's talk about Noah's flood. You guys believe that there was a time in world history that the entire world flooded??

Uhmm?

The entire world from Israel to America to Lagos??

THERE IS NO SINGLE HISTORICAL EVIDENCE THAT NOAH's flood happened.

That's what we've been telling you guys. The Bible is a christocentric material. The content of the Bible is Christology not history.

All content of the Bible including true life stories, parables, stories all have a message, it is Christ...

What we take is the lesson about Christ. We don't start looking for who Cain married.

Egbon Dasuki, you and your clans are terrible students of the Bible.

Terrible students make terrible teachers.

[Apostle Magnus Seyi @ApostleMSO]

You are wrong sir, very wrong!
I have seen some I f you argument on this matter and I must say that they don't represent what the scripture teaches. For example, you claimed that faith precedes regeneration! How false can that be?

We were dead in sin and trespasses but your argument suggest that we just fainted and still have a molecule of life that could respond to the divine call to slavtion without the enablement of God.

You are a good teacher and also a passionate one at that but it doesn't excuse your ignorance on the matter of soteriology. If there is a gospel that teaches the fear of God and appreciation to God at thesame time, then it is hypergrace.

No doubts, there are extremes in the way some peddle the message but I believe that extremism is a disease that affects everyone of us, if not in this area but in any other area.

Remember, before God could speak light into the creation, the Spirit of God must first hover upon the waters. Every man that comes to Jesus was drawn by the Father. How? By regeneration! A spiritual awakening, a rebirth, a new life, a new spirit is the backend of the sinners willing exercise of faith in Christ.

Salvation and the keeping of it, is of the Lord, for if He shall mark iniquity, none of us shall be able to stand...

[Faithfulness Okom @AttorneyF_]

A man walks into a waiting hall with a woman. They both appear to be around the same age. Both wear matching gold rings on their left ring fingers. They enter holding hands, a toddler between them. He kisses her and leaves.

If Someone says they are married and you respond, “I didn’t literally hear him say she is my wife,” you are not being rigorous. You are being dishonest.

Suppose later the same day you see the same couple at a restaurant celebrating with friends and you ask one of the waiters “hey what are they celebrating over there” and the waiter says the couple in matching outfits is celebrating their second wedding anniversary. If you walk out still unconvinced because the man never explicitly said “she is my wife,” you are a fool.

This is the exact level of critical thinking behind this argument about Jesus not saying “I am God”. That it has survived this long is a massive indictment on the intellectual standards of everyone who repeats it. If I were Muslim, I would plead with Imams to retire it before it does further damage to the faith's credibility.

We live in a world governed by circumstantial evidence. The justice system convicts people who never admit guilt, on the basis of facts alone. A court doesn't need a killer to say “I did it.” It examines interlocking data points: DNA, cell tower pings, footage, motive, and timelines.

One piece of evidence can be contested. When fifty lock together, they form an inescapable net. To deny the conclusion because you lack a literal confession is a deliberate suspension of common sense.

And the irony cuts deep cos you guys are quick to claim Jesus was Muslim, when you don’t have a single verse where he says “I am Muslim.” The selective bias is shamefully demonic.

If we take the framework I’ve laid down into first-century Judea and look at the interlocking facts:

Jesus used the absolute "I Am" (Ego eimi), the exact phrasing Jews recognized as the divine name given to Moses at the burning bush. When he spoke it, they picked up stones. You do not stone a man for claiming to be a good teacher.

He stood before the Sanhedrin and told the high priest they would see the Son of Man seated at the right hand of Power, coming on the clouds of heaven, drawing from Daniel 7, where the Son of Man receives everlasting dominion. The high priest tore his garments, the prescribed response to blasphemy.

He called himself Lord of the Sabbath, an institution YHWH established at creation. To claim lordship over it is to claim the authority of its author.

He forgave sins. Directly: “Your sins are forgiven.” The scribes responded: “Who can forgive sins but God alone?” They were theologically correct. He did not correct them.

These were men formed in the architecture of Jewish theology. They understood divine prerogative. Their repeated response was execution. You do not execute a man for blasphemy because he is a moral teacher. You execute him because he claimed what their tradition reserves for God alone.

The verdict does not require your agreement. It required theirs. And they gave it.

To look at all that evidence and say “he never claimed to be God” means you already made up your mind before reading. But at least be honest about it and retire the kindergarten logic.

[Apostle Magnus Seyi @ApostleMSO]

@Phoenix_ECPI @Kristoff5889851 Oh okay, I see you always have your own way of giving meaning and interpretation to hard sentences. Good of you!

[Apostle Magnus Seyi @ApostleMSO]

We need to thank God, for God is not a man. Adultery in every sense of it is evil and personally before I gave my life to Christ, it's one of the errors anyone can make and will make me hate him/her. I hate adultery with a passion but we need to be very careful in passing out extra biblical judgements that may even damage the soul of the offender. If I should go by everything under this thread, brother possible agrees with the position, simply put, that a pastor who fell into the sin of immorality is no longer a pastor, no longer called and must never again minister to God's people in God's presence. As much as this is a denominational measure, it is against the Spirit of the scripture but if there is any scripture that gives such verdict, I will gladly repent of my position.

A man called of God sinned, and the church canceled him out, to what end?

Again, thank God, He is not a man!

[Brother Possible @BrotherPossible]

"All sins are not equal. Some sins are greater than others; and whoever is living in immorality has no place in Christian ministry."
- Apostle Gideon Odoma

[Apostle Magnus Seyi @ApostleMSO]

@Samuelronald01 I love this too
Thanks

[Apostle Magnus Seyi @ApostleMSO]

For a type of sexual sin... A sexual sin that involves his father's wife... If a pastor do such, he should be severely death with even to the point of excommunucation.

If you look into 1cor 5 where Paul suggests excommunucation for that particular brother who committed adultery with his father's wife. His condition is far worse than the sin itself, he was puffed up and nonchalant, he never regretted the act until Paul heard the sad news. So Paul knowing fully well the damage that could have done to his soul and how such act could spread like cancer, asked the church to quarantine him and to be delivered to satan for severe dealings that will break his ego and such tendencies. But here is the goal "so that his spirit might be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus"

The goal is not to shame him nor is it to say he's no longer a Christian but rather to restore him in a more perfect shape.

If a pastor do such, we can also apply thesame measure and of a truth. A sexual sin that involves ones fathers wife is more severe than just a sexual sin with a sister somewhere.

My point lies within the frame of a pastor with a sister caught in adultery, we cannot cancel out the pastor completely and deny his calling altogether because of that. He should be punished but not canceled out. Personally, I won't advocate in any way for a pastor who slept with his father's wife or who consistently engage in sexual sins.

[DaSuKi @chukaobi]

If a regular member of church is commanded be excommunicated for a type sexual sin as seen in 1 Corinthians 5, what do you think is the punishment for a pastor who engages sexual sin?
Should the punishment be less for the pastor or more?

[Apostle Magnus Seyi @ApostleMSO]

In summary, it is the church that calls people Apostles not Christ. According to your logic, because the church is equal to Christ?

What is the name of the church or who and who makes up the group that sent Peter?

Also, I am yet to know how the church and Christ are thesame because I believe your assumption stems from the spiritual union of Christ and His church.

[Apostle Magnus Seyi @ApostleMSO]

That's not everything to it pls
A missionary can also be a teacher or an evangelist. Offices are not first about activities surrounding it but how the Spirit of the occupant of the said office is wired by God. Besides, the church cannot send anyone, it is God alone who calls and sends people while the church only confirms it and offer platforms.

[Apostle Magnus Seyi @ApostleMSO]

@khingxly That's also my take sir.
Thanks

[Apostle Magnus Seyi @ApostleMSO]

@iamdadasbamise People with understanding already solved the puzzle with me. Thanks

[Apostle Magnus Seyi @ApostleMSO]

My name is Magnus Seyi and it is boldly written on my profile. There is no offense if you make me your burden for the next 3yrs to find out who made me an Apostle. You may start by going to God everyday in prayers consistently until He responds to you and tell you how I became an Apostle. That's the surest means!

[Apostle Magnus Seyi @ApostleMSO]

Let me try because I'm better with speaking than writing. So bear with me!

An Apostle is one who is sent directly by Jesus but of a truth, there is no minster of God that is not sent but the Apostle himself must have a firsthand encounter with the person of the risen Lord.

Secondly, an Apostle is to establish doctrine for the purpose of making Christ alone the foundation of the believer

Thirdly, an Apostle is to give clear explanation to a prophetic move of God at every season

Fourtly, just as a prophet labors to secure the mind of God, an Apostle labors to explain the operation of God that dwells within the context of prophetic revelations

Also, an Apostle confirms the soul of believers by the ministry of the laying on of hands such as the prophets too

In addition, an Apostle must be very rich in spiritual encounters and anointed for signs and wonders.

Selah!

[Apostle Magnus Seyi @ApostleMSO]

@BrotherPossible I believe 100%, but the goal is restoration.
Excommunucate to restore into a more perfect person
Excommunicate to cancel out is what I don't agree with

1cor 5

[Apostle Magnus Seyi @ApostleMSO]

Christ!

[Anna 🤍🥀 @annhybri]

If women are to submit to their husband, who are men supposed to submit to?

[Apostle Magnus Seyi @ApostleMSO]

A potential terrorist who may need to kill and die for Allah one day but who knows when?

[Maliq @MasterMaliq]

Be honest: as a non-Muslim, when you see a Muslim, what comes to your mind first?

[Faithfulness Okom @AttorneyF_]

I struggled to understand why Jesus praised Peter so highly for identifying him as the Messiah in Matthew 16.

It felt too dramatic, like he was over-spiritualizing something obvious. Peter had been traveling with him, watching the signs firsthand. Of course he knew. The high praise didn’t make sense to me, until I meditated on it.

First-century Judea had a precise and non-negotiable job description for the Messiah: a geopolitical conqueror, a second David who would break Roman occupation over his knee.

What Peter was looking at instead was a broke, unbacked teacher from a backwater town, branded a radical by the religious elite, with no army, no treasury, and no political standing whatsoever. Every physical reality in front of them said no.

The friction ran deeper. Even John the Baptist, who baptized Jesus and heard the voice from heaven, later sent messengers from prison asking, “Are you the one, or do we look for another?” If John doubted after everything he witnessed, the disciples holding steady was not a human achievement. It couldn’t be.

So when Jesus says, “flesh and blood has not revealed this to you,” he is not being dramatic, he is being precise. Left to human logic in that specific moment, concluding he was the Christ was an impossible deduction. The Father had to pull back the curtain.

Immediately after, Jesus speaks of the cross and impending tribulation, and Peter rebukes him: “This shall never happen to you.” It prompts Jesus’s harshest recorded response: “Get thee behind me, Satan.”

Peter’s spectacular crash is the ultimate proof that Jesus wasn’t over-spiritualizing things. The whiplash is the evidence. Left to his own devices for a second, Peter blunders so severely he is called the enemy. The rock instantly becomes a stumbling block. Peter wasn’t a genius; he was a blind man who momentarily had the curtain pulled back.

The Father had unveiled the identity, but not yet its meaning. Peter saw the Who before the What. Revelation is layered. You can receive genuine sight and still be blind to the next dimension because the curtain lifts in stages.

And that is the trap inside the gift of sight. When light comes, it rewrites your memory of the dark. You stop remembering what blindness felt like. Grace becomes furniture. Present, unremarkable, owned but never received.

Paul names this disease in a single sentence: “What do you have that you did not receive?”

The same Father who pulled the curtain back for you has not pulled it back yet for the person next to you, or is pulling it back slowly, the way dawn moves. That is not their failure. It asks of you not contempt but patience; not pride but the tenderness of someone who knows they were also once blind.

“Flesh and blood has not revealed this to you.”

That sentence is not praise. It is a disqualification. Jesus wasn’t honoring Peter’s perception. He was bearing witness to the Father’s action. Peter had no credit to keep, and neither do we. Every confession any of us has ever made was given, not achieved.

The only honest response to clarity you did not earn is not confidence in your own sight. It is wonder. And a tenderness toward the still-blind that only the formerly blind can carry.

[Apostle Magnus Seyi @ApostleMSO]

@FrancisI82380 Consistent immorality must be shunned with full force. A man struggling that much should not lead God's people in my opinion

[Apostle Magnus Seyi @ApostleMSO]

@FrancisI82380 My name is not ifeanyi!
Also, 70% of me came from the ministry of Apostle Arome Osayi, even though it's obvious that I don't agree with him on few doctrines. My love for AAO is beyond natural...

[Apostle Magnus Seyi @ApostleMSO]

@BrotherPossible I'd appreciate it