If the man dies, this is murder. There’s no possible legal rationale for backing up and firing multiple shots into a man who’s lying flat on the ground.
There’s no ambiguity here. Those shots are to kill, not to stop a threat.
Matter of A. Vasquez, 27 I&N Dec. 503 (BIA 2019) ( kidnapping under 18 U.S.C. 1201(a) not an aggravated felony under INA 101(a)(43)(H)) https://t.co/Lqey796BBR
@AskScribd This problem only started happening in the last week or so, and it's incredibly disruptive to ourselves and to our readers. So we need to know whether this is a permanent (and ill-advised) change or whether it was an inadvertent coding error that can be fixed
@AskScribd However, these two posts (https://t.co/NCaP4ejCq2 and https://t.co/2eiwwUtq9b) don't say anything about private documents not being downloadable (other than when they're embedded). So either the info from Jasmine A. was incorrect, or the posts on your website are misleading
Rodriguez-Arias v. Whitaker (CA4) (reverses denial of CAT because agency failed to aggregate risk of torture from multiple sources or consider country conditions evidence) https://t.co/SHRkhp2e15
Flores-Panameno v. AG (CA11) (grants petition because IJ failed to suitably recreate record in determining whether acceptance of pre-completion voluntary departure was knowing and voluntary) https://t.co/6J2tltE6Qv
@hbushra @TolchinImm No problem. Please follow the instructions at the link below if you need to use our same-day BIA filing service: https://t.co/GC1F8M9BIz
Jasso Arangure v. Whitaker (CA6) (overrules Matter of Jasso Arangure, 27 I&N Dec. 178 (BIA 2017), holds that res judicata applies in removal proceedings) https://t.co/SsI0sWDRkF
Alom v. Whitaker (CA2) (BIA should have applied de novo review in determining whether petitioner qualified for good faith marriage waiver) https://t.co/kJh4E4g5OY
Keeley v. Whitaker (CA6) (overturns Matter of Keeley, 27 I&N Dec. 146 (BIA 2017), holds that digital penetration does not qualify as "rape" in INA 101(a)(43)(A)) https://t.co/P1BM8BGxI7
Salmoran v. AG, CA3 (possession of child pornography under NJSA 2C:24-4(b)(5)(b) is a crime of child abuse but not an aggravated felony) https://t.co/ADpAwCOayu