@TheEconomist The Economist in full-on propaganda gutter journalism mode. Who is paying The Economist lots of $$$ to push this narrative? That is the question.
@TechAheadAnkit@Pthenew39@stats_feed Apart from the massive infrastructure development, legal and administrative development and founding of universities and colleges, to name just some of the benefits of British administration, we also ended Sati, the repulsive Indian practice of widow burning. You're welcome.
@TechAheadAnkit@Pthenew39@stats_feed As I said, the vast majority of the British army in India was Indian. We administered the country with a few thousand administrators. If 300,000,000 people weren't capable of overthrowing a few thousand administrators then it's not quite the picture you're painting.
@TechAheadAnkit@Pthenew39@stats_feed All the British did was administer India. You can't rule 300,000,000 people with a few thousand administrators. The British army in India was overwhelmingly Indian.
@Diex_Marlowe@NME@oliviarodrigo You sounds rational...not.
I was talking about alienating her fanbase, but obviously that sailed completely over your head.