ArbitraryAxiom

pyrrhonian skepticism (I engage in ludic discourse) | conceptual error theory (ethics, purpose, free will) | pragmatic nihilism | prioritize semantic clarity

[ArbitraryAxiom @ArbitraryAxiom]

@NotEvolution1 What’s so bad about morality being subjective?

[ArbitraryAxiom @ArbitraryAxiom]

@michaelsavesUSA @JadeK526 Not even denying it jfl

[ArbitraryAxiom @ArbitraryAxiom]

@michaelsavesUSA @JadeK526 “Little guy” someone’s 5”9
I feel it from over here. I have a special sense for manlet incels like yourself :(

[ArbitraryAxiom @ArbitraryAxiom]

@michaelsavesUSA @JadeK526 Translated = hit a nerve and don’t know how to respond 🥺

[ArbitraryAxiom @ArbitraryAxiom]

@michaelsavesUSA @JadeK526 See how you constantly have to belittle me since you feel so little yourself. Can’t even refer to any proof for something you base your life on but you make the effort to reply to all my comments 🥺

[ArbitraryAxiom @ArbitraryAxiom]

@ImLukePen @JadeK526 Also can you prove an eternal thing needs a cause?

[ArbitraryAxiom @ArbitraryAxiom]

@ImLukePen @JadeK526 The universe doesn’t cause itself or end and begin. It permanently exists, it just changes shapes (singularity, expansion and shrinkage). The same way if I take paper and crush it into a ball, the paper didn’t cause the ball, it transformed.

[ArbitraryAxiom @ArbitraryAxiom]

@michaelsavesUSA @JadeK526 Okay I’ll just google “scientific evidence for Gods existence”.

Nvm there isn’t any.

[ArbitraryAxiom @ArbitraryAxiom]

@michaelsavesUSA @JadeK526 Burden of proof. Ever heard of it?

[ArbitraryAxiom @ArbitraryAxiom]

@darwintojesus Justice = “the successful enforcement of a moral code. That moral code can be that of a person or group.”

No God needed

[ArbitraryAxiom @ArbitraryAxiom]

@michaelsavesUSA @JadeK526 For example?

[ArbitraryAxiom @ArbitraryAxiom]

@ImLukePen @JadeK526 Usually people assume if something is eternal it doesn’t need a cause since a cause precedes its effect and you can’t precede something eternal.

I guess you say God doesn’t need a cause. Why doesn’t he?

[ArbitraryAxiom @ArbitraryAxiom]

@philosophymeme0 @SpeedWatkins Philosopher vs poet

[ArbitraryAxiom @ArbitraryAxiom]

@LeonidaClips @JadeK526 Who says the physical constants are “tuned”? What if they can only be that exact value instead of being randomly assigned.

Big Bang -> many planets -> many chances for abiogenesis, at least one succeeds.

The last is appeal to authority.

[ArbitraryAxiom @ArbitraryAxiom]

@BFordress925 @JadeK526 This summarises a possible view on what time and temporal change is

[ArbitraryAxiom @ArbitraryAxiom]

I claim we can’t empirically distinguish if we are just experiencing one particular moment in time or if we are passing through time having experienced many different points in time.

[ArbitraryAxiom @ArbitraryAxiom]

@BFordress925 @JadeK526 Wdym? There can be temporal change without the concepts of actualisation and potential. Further more, the concept of temporal change is unsubstantiated and not necessary to make sense of the world.

[ArbitraryAxiom @ArbitraryAxiom]

@LeonidaClips @JadeK526 “The fact that there’s something rather than nothing is evidence in itself.”

Why? Can you make an argument?

[ArbitraryAxiom @ArbitraryAxiom]

@LeonidaClips @JadeK526 Can you be more specific? I could say “Evidence against Gods existence is all around you. You just can’t fathom it”

Stop hand-waving and proof God exists.

[ArbitraryAxiom @ArbitraryAxiom]

@darwintojesus Value doesn’t exist

[ArbitraryAxiom @ArbitraryAxiom]

@Wheels528 @darwintojesus So what?