Imagine you could have invested in the internet's TCP/IP protocol in 1990 and your investment rose every time someone transferred information between websites.
This is similar to what BTP and ICON is offering.
https://t.co/rCdOl9y2R7
We are excited to announce the launch of our brand new NFT Platform โNFTs For A Cause,โ the first and only NFT platform built to reward charitable donations. To celebrate Fandiem is dropping our very first #NFT: Fans With Benefits Pass (minted on @helloiconworld)
Gangwon-do's 'Nayana' service to which ICONLOOP's DID technology is applied was ranked 2nd in Google's popular category within 2 days of its release.
https://t.co/PLXeY0XObe
An idea for the community: can the ENS model be applied to #ICON or even to the entire BTP Network?
Since #BTP is going to be as fundamental to blockchain as the TCP/IP protocol, doesnโt it make sense to have BTP Name Service?
Call me: "max.btp"
https://t.co/KgU99xo1Zw
$ICX community -
ICYMI Eric from our team has been doing a lot of great stuff in our @helloiconworld community forum so I encourage you all to take a look!
Would love to see some more participation, specifically from our Validators.
Here are some discussions taking place ๐
This is massive.
BTP's Arbitrary Call Service is a framework for "generic cross-chain smart contract calls, allowing devs to make unique and complex cross-chain dApps that are not bound by the limitations of a purpose-built bridging service."
https://t.co/qcnIjIyR85
@GorillaNeed @shikamarumind1 Yep, if we're investing $50K-100K in projects, I think we need to do due diligence beyond just a P-Reps reading 500 word proposals. IRL meetings, vetted teams and biz plans.
I like the idea of funded categories. It makes room and sets a budget for different project types.
P-Reps don't forgot to vote for the CPS proposals. This cycle has many projects and we should all be thoughtful about use of funds.
We have seen an influx of projects, but few Minimum Viable Product's, new teams, and vetting. Bc of this @Arcade__Max proposed a CPS VC fund...
Do I understand correctly that people are running around calling themselves "blockchain engineers" but then building insecure bridges because "light clients are hard" ?
Is that really an acceptable state of affairs?