Using the ChatGPT app today gave me an updated UI idea for the OpenAi Devs.
1. The problem: while searching for rudimentary knowledge, I am drawn to a fast paced UI such as Google Chrome, as it feels more native for “ give me a quick answer” functions when Gemini creates an instant reply in bold words within the interface.
2. When using GPT, the time to answer the same fast based knowledge question actually takes slightly longer from opening the app to getting the answer. When the answer is delivered, GPT will ask a follow up, which is not as streamlined as Gemini’s response routine, which is more statement oriented.
3. Solution. Think of this, you open the GPT app and your cursor arrives with the keyboard open ready for your prompt within a large text bubble. If you ask a question here, it will answer in the style of Google Gemini’s UI with large, bold words which connect with the users attention. It will feel more native for these less intensive questions. When the app is closed, the conversation would still save into the previous chats section, allowing the user to go back in and have a conversation about that topic within its own thread.
I guess I’m articulating a type of dual context window cross awareness.
The goal is to maximize how people use AI, even for more simple or grounded answers. This UI design would allow non native users to cross over between ( chrome users ) while keeping everything intact for current GPT users, within the tabs section.
Make sense of it or not, it’s an idea and a spontaneous exercise of abstract thinking. Little morning warm up.
AGI will empower those who have awaited the technology through personal experiences never thought imaginable.
Those hating on AI, robotics, calling post-scarcity bad are simply too ignorant to have a world view that’s bigger than the low novelty troughs this group inhabits.
People would rather jump on a ship sinking with fear than figure out which way the wild is blowing.
I doubt we or whoever goes will care what it looks like.
The goal is to be on another planet! Not in a fancy box on another planet.
Also, humans with such a great sense of adventure would most likely not support your vision of better boxes. They would rather go climb down the giant Grand Canyon feature on Mars and map it over a decade.
The people you made your original post for are actually just shareholders.
No evolved entity would desire a better and more colorful and uselessly complex box to live in.
Half of Elons ideas are truly incorrect, this one above stems from old world motivations as well, not the true motives for going to Mars AND BEYOND.
Bro wouldn’t last a day in deep space without a palace in the sky.
Try a cozy area in your mind that you build, not buy.
I find the best way is to write about 70% of my posts myself, keeping it 100% authentic with nuance.
Other times, I will write something long and detailed with too many rabbit holes, and use AI to re-write it while keeping my original information and not adding anything else.
I feel like the latter is okay, but it still comes off as robotic or automated if the reader defects it was created by AI.
Deeper AGI layers will allow an AI summarized or polished writing to be seen as “ authentic “ or human in the loop. A way for the reader to always know how much of the AI’s output was from the human vs pure automation.
Invest in X. It even rhymes. It’s honestly better to consolidate this type of technology to one broad company.
So much from materials science to using AI to map flight data has to come together to have working system.
I think Jeff should focus more on logistical support in manufacturing robotics.
I’m not advocating for Elon to take over the world though. Just the fact one must create, coordinate, update and run rockets at mass scale with AGI while not having causalities- is better off under one big umbrella.
Research and lab testing prototypes is independent from one company though and that should stay that way to increase creativity. Those results are often used by larger companies.
Nothing about that makes him special or better than anyone else.
Basically he was afforded access to education, and was guided by his parents. His mother particularly loves him. Most of us do not receive 1 million dollars and unconditional support during our growing years.
Kids in Africa show more promise socially than Musk ever will. Yet they are massively underserved and live in hell.
The story of that child’s success is just as real as Elons.
Senators do not understand AI.
Best way for us: advance AGI and work so hard that the act of slowing it down will be left in the past the next day, next hour, or preferably next minute.
The old system cannot govern personal AI. It needs to become a human right to gain protections, the right to access AGI systems without government interference or orchestration of the models. The right to access knowledge is what it is at its core.
Let’s make that happen.
AI should dramatically increase quality of life and individual freedoms for people around the world.
The OpenAI Foundation is making an initial $250M commitment to measurement, transition support, and new approaches to broadly shared prosperity.
https://t.co/zOD8O94RjQ
Sam Altman shares what he thinks the world will look like in the future
"Unimaginable prosperity seems likely"
"What I hope for, but what I think we have to really work for is radical levels of human agency where people can just do and create beyond anyone's imagination, and we avoid the kind of centralization of power tendencies."
We are still in the time where the most popular, most funded and most educated are put to the front of the line.
The opt in system powered by AGI will give a task portal tailored to your intellectual profile.
The ability to wake up to work which empowers you or others, connects you with likeminded groups, and updates based on your performance and skills DEMONSTRATED will be revolutionary.
No more interviews, no more gatekeepers. Just you and the system helping match you to your most optimal output.
I’ve written about this in greater detail, find it on my profile.
OpenAI will help usher in this with wearable always on technology. The personal era, while Optimus and Xai create the floor for universal high income through robotic deployment.
@thinkingwest This is just another step in the unfoldment of history. We might be getting closer to the end, but we shouldn’t set ourselves off to be sure that we are.
AI is used against the public as an anti progress message.
People who hold power, make decisions and have control do not want you empowered by AI.
They want you to fear change, all for their wallets to prosper.
If AGI is released this year, we have time to run this through the metaphorical ringer until it’s embedded in every aspect of our lives.
We don’t have time to put this technology in a prison and “ wait for researchers” to make this a technology FOR ALL.
The elites are terrified they are losing control over personal consciousness.
So take control of your own already.