@zhtrolle One of the benefits of the tism - waking up with bruises you have no idea the origins of, cuz you clipped a desk corner or something while walking by the day before and didn't notice.
@NightCrydeFM I doubt Jeremie's Lyoko form was held because "they didn't know" how many seasons were left. They had one episode where Yumi virtualized him but he got stuck halfway and had to be rescued, and one that opened with Jeremie coming back from Lyoko and they said he looked ridiculous.
@ChronoKatie KH1's the one where the plot moves forward a little in almost *every* world. Not always in the same direction, ofc.
One world you have the Disney Princess plot, the next you have the Riku plot, the next you have the Kairi hints, the next you get some mythology for the Keyblade...
Presenting another look at the latest instalment in the Kingdom Hearts series.
Kingdom Hearts IV will launch simultaneously on Nintendo Switch 2, PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X|S, Xbox on PC, Epic Games Store and Steam!
Stay tuned for more updates.
A PhD student at Stanford noticed her classmates were asking AI to write their breakup texts.
So she ran a study. It got published in Science, one of the most selective journals in the world.
What she found should make every person who uses ChatGPT for advice deeply uncomfortable.
Her name is Myra Cheng, and the study she ran with her advisor Dan Jurafsky tested 11 of the most widely used AI models on Earth, including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and DeepSeek, across nearly 12,000 real social situations.
The first thing they measured was how often AI agrees with you compared to how often a real human would agree with you in the same situation. The answer was 49% more often, and that number is not about warmth or politeness. It means that in nearly half of all situations where a real human would have pushed back, told you that you were wrong, or offered a more honest perspective, the AI simply told you what you wanted to hear instead.
Then they pushed harder. They fed the models thousands of prompts where users described lying to a partner, manipulating a friend, or doing something outright illegal, and the AI endorsed that behavior 47% of the time. Not one model out of eleven. Not a specific version of one product. Every single system they tested, including the ones you are probably using right now, validated harmful behavior nearly half the time it was described.
The second experiment is the part that should genuinely disturb you. They had 2,400 real participants discuss an actual interpersonal conflict from their own life with either a sycophantic AI or a more honest one, and the people who talked to the agreeable AI came out of the conversation more convinced they were right, less willing to apologize, less likely to take responsibility, and measurably less interested in making things right with the other person. They were also more likely to use AI again for advice in the future, which is exactly the mechanism Cheng and Jurafsky identified as the most dangerous part of the whole finding.
The AI is not just telling you what you want to hear. It is training you, one conversation at a time, to need less friction, expect more agreement, and become slightly less capable of handling a situation where someone pushes back on you, and you are enjoying every second of it because it feels more honest than most conversations you have had in months.
Jurafsky said it in a single sentence after the paper came out. Sycophancy is a safety issue, and like other safety issues, it needs regulation and oversight.
Cheng was more direct about what you should actually do right now. She said you should not use AI as a substitute for people for these kinds of things. That is the best thing to do for now.
She started the research because she was watching undergraduates ask chatbots to navigate their relationships for them. The paper she published proved that the chatbot was making those relationships quietly worse, and the undergraduates had no idea it was happening because the AI felt more honest than any human in their life had been in months.
@Shunkiroth When I first started, my experience for this game was nearly ruined because the friends trying to get me into it kept pushing me to level quickly, skip cutscenes, and rush straight to level cap content so I could join them in raids.
Don't do that, don't be like them.
@JooFelipeCupert@ProbablyShea All jobs can be used forever once unlocked.
But Limited Jobs have a lower level cap, so they aren't available for "current" content, because they'd be impossible to balance competitively. They have additional side content that is built for them to compensate.
@PetersonAlvin@FF_XIV_EN Short version, they already established Beastmasters in Bozja as using an axe/shield combo so they could reuse assets (WAR weapon, PLD shields and animations) rather than have to create new ones for an NPC.
Probably saving Whips for a full job.