Radioactive☢️

🇮🇳🇵🇸||muslim
🍉
Cricket||Geopolitics
#CSK

[Radioactive☢️ @Arcreactor6k]

@scopethetruth what happened bihari dalit?🤣🤣 blocked me after getting constantly fact checked and stop stealing other contents nigga have scope the truth his page name and still blocked me coward peice of shit bhadwe tmkc l*du dalit bhadwe hai auqaat to unblock karke dikha

[Radioactive☢️ @Arcreactor6k]

@SheilaGreenfiel @Zeev81309559 Fired on the car?355 bullets were shot
Car was accelerating towards them?they know that in car there was 2 children alive and when 2 rescurer comes to rescue them,they deliberately killed them and 2 child too and never forget a shell was fired too from tank but idf is "moral"🤡

[Radioactive☢️ @Arcreactor6k]

@SheilaGreenfiel @Zeev81309559 Her wording "may have" when even idf has acknowledged so ??

[Radioactive☢️ @Arcreactor6k]

@jane_ethan12 Oh in 2014 what happened then??

[Radioactive☢️ @Arcreactor6k]

@harukaawake Well now japanese nigga cant click his pic under the skirt so he is sad

[Radioactive☢️ @Arcreactor6k]

@MaxNordau Nigga shifting topic to qatar bcz idf has acknowledged killing of hind rajab and if u don't know this guy was propagating that no hamas killed her idf is world most "moral" army🤡

[Radioactive☢️ @Arcreactor6k]

@SheilaGreenfiel @Zeev81309559 Why did u give this??

[Radioactive☢️ @Arcreactor6k]

@billyriddlejr @a__abba @Boss_Aleeyu Textual variants directly alter core doctrines, such as 1 John 5:7 (Johannine Comma) added to support the Trinity, and Mark 16:9-20/John 7:53-8:11 missing from the earliest manuscripts. Major theological changes aren't "minor alterations."

[Radioactive☢️ @Arcreactor6k]

@billyriddlejr @a__abba @Boss_Aleeyu Ehrman’s personal stance on Islam is irrelevant to textual criticism; scholars are cited for their academic work on manuscript variants, not their religious views. Ad hominem arguments don't invalidate manuscript evidence.

[Radioactive☢️ @Arcreactor6k]

@billyriddlejr @a__abba @Boss_Aleeyu If textual alterations and variant readings exist across ancient manuscripts of the Injil (Gospels), that same manuscript tradition and textual history applies broadly it isn't a selective process that specifically removed only verses supporting Muhammad pbuh

[Radioactive☢️ @Arcreactor6k]

@billyriddlejr @a__abba @Boss_Aleeyu This creates an inescapable dilemma: either God truly died which violates God's immortal nature or only a human shell died, which completely invalidates the idea that "God died and resurrected to defeat death."

[Radioactive☢️ @Arcreactor6k]

@billyriddlejr @a__abba @Boss_Aleeyu If His divine spirit went into Hades conscious and active to fight Satan, then He never stopped living or acting. He was simply moving between dimensions. Calling a victorious, fully conscious mission "death" distorts the word entirely.

[Radioactive☢️ @Arcreactor6k]

@billyriddlejr @a__abba @Boss_Aleeyu Comparing God to paper and ink completely fails. Paper is just a physical material that holds text, but Christians claim Jesus is God incarnate. If the divine nature was completely unaffected, then God sacrificed nothing of Himself.

[Radioactive☢️ @Arcreactor6k]

@billyriddlejr @a__abba @Boss_Aleeyu If only His physical body died while His divine spirit stayed alive, then God Himself never actually experienced death. A temporary loss of a human container isn't a true sacrifice—it's just discarding a suit.

[Radioactive☢️ @Arcreactor6k]

@billyriddlejr @a__abba @Boss_Aleeyu Suffering "for my name's sake" applies to God's chosen representatives and messengers throughout scripture. Receiving rewards for honoring God’s appointed Messiah proves His central role in God's plan, not that He is Yahweh Himself

[Radioactive☢️ @Arcreactor6k]

@billyriddlejr @a__abba @Boss_Aleeyu Sitting on a throne and judging tribes indicates granted authority, not inherent deity. God gave Him that judgment seat (John 5:22; Dan 7:13-14). An exalted, delegated King receives authority from God He does not originate it as God

[Radioactive☢️ @Arcreactor6k]

@billyriddlejr @a__abba @Boss_Aleeyu Saying "only God is good" directly contrasts Jesus's earthly presence with God's absolute nature. If Jesus intended to claim deity, stating that goodness belongs exclusively to someone else is the exact opposite of how to convey it.

[Radioactive☢️ @Arcreactor6k]

@billyriddlejr @a__abba @Boss_Aleeyu The claim that Jesus was "rebuking flattery" actually conceded the main point: Jesus refused the title "good" because He refused to accept a title reserved strictly for God. If He were God, accepting the title as valid praise wouldn't be flattery.

[Radioactive☢️ @Arcreactor6k]

@billyriddlejr @a__abba @Boss_Aleeyu If Jesus were trying to trick the man into a secret Trinitarian puzzle, it undermines His entire role as a clear teacher. He didn't ask a rhetorical trap; He set a clear boundary between human/messianic limits and the absolute perfection of God

[Radioactive☢️ @Arcreactor6k]

@billyriddlejr @a__abba @Boss_Aleeyu Inserting "Premise B: Jesus is absolutely good" forces an assumption onto the text that Jesus never stated. Jesus explicitly redirected goodness away from Himself to highlight the single, undivided source of ultimate authority: God alone

[Radioactive☢️ @Arcreactor6k]

@billyriddlejr @a__abba @Boss_Aleeyu Equating Yahweh strictly with a Trinity distorts Old Testament monotheism. Jesus explicitly identified the Father alone as the "only true God" in John 17:3, distinguishing Himself entirely from that unique divine identity