Arlen Hogg

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Right. Just so we’re all clear.

Farage and Reform tried to put me in prison because I backed the mass deportation of Pakistani child rapists and their foreign wives/relatives who allowed it to happen.

My home was raided by armed police late on a Friday night as a direct result of Reform’s allegations. My guns were seized. They tried to ruin my life. In every way.

Farage admitted on national television it was all because I backed mass deportations.

He said that was the moment they realised they ‘had to get rid’ of me.

Not the bullshit allegations they went to the police with, but the fact I want the Pakistani rapists removed from our country.

He admitted it.

That all happened.

Fair enough. I took it on the chin, and planned out our next step.

I founded Restore Britain to give the British people the democratic option to agree with me.

Restore Britain will, without apology, deport every last foreign rapist and all foreign accomplices who knew it was happening, yet failed to act.

If that means entire communities go, that means entire communities go. I really don’t care.

We will rid Britain of that cancer.

Now Reform are incandescently angry that we are giving the British people that choice.

Deploying increasingly desperate smears against our movement.

If people don’t agree, they can vote for someone else who won’t deport. There are plenty of options - Reform, Labour, Tories. Take your pick. Go for it.

But if you want those evil scumbags out of our country, along with every foreign coward who enabled it?

You now have that genuine option.

Restore Britain.

[Billboard Chris 🌎 @BillboardChris]

I just interviewed @KerryLynneFindl at my home for about an hour.

We covered everything on gender ideology and child transition, got into DRIPA, and more.

She may be the next Premier of BC, and I think your confidence in her can only increase after you hear this interview.

Stay tuned. I’ll have it uploaded tomorrow.

[Larry Brock @LarryBrockMP]

🚨BREAKING:

Hours after delaying the vote, the Liberal Chair has now reversed course and ruled Conservative’s amendment “out of scope.”

This was a common sense solution: a 4-year mandatory minimum when a firearm is used in extortion.

Extortion is up 330% across Canada, and instead of acting, this government “needed more time to deliberate”

Well now we know why: they were waiting for direction from Carney to block these measures.

Soft on crime. Soft on accountability. These Liberals never change

[Alex Jones Network @AJNlive]

ɴᴇᴡ ʜᴏᴍᴇ. sᴀᴍᴇ ᴍɪssɪᴏɴ: https://t.co/JJPR3iSU9r

[Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸 @mtgreenee]

I love @RealAlexJones
You can’t stop him. Follow his new network here.
Infowars lives on at the Alex Jones Network.

[Michael Thomlinson @miket136]

Mark Carney is the only foreigner influencing my support for Alberta Independence.

[D.C.L. @abc123jjj]

I don’t want endless taxes.

I don’t want to be a part of the New World Order.

I don’t want to live in a country with an unelected majority government - otherwise known as a dictatorship.

I don’t want a government that’s soft on crime or a government that’s run by criminals.

I don’t want to live in a country where more businesses are closing than opening.

I don’t want to live in the country that has the highest food inflation in the G7.

I don’t want to live in a country that’s in a constant state of crisis.

I don’t want to live in a country where the government has come up with a laundry list of reasons to kill you - where all you have to do is ask.

I don’t want to live in a country where women’s rights are being violated to protect the feelings of mentally ill men.

And I don’t want to live in a country filled with people who willingly vote to destroy it.

I don’t want any of that.
But that’s what we’ve got.
And I think ot sucks.

I think what the Liberal Party has done to this once great country is awful.

So you can stop telling me that Canada’s the best place to live, or that Canada’s the freest country in the world, or that Canadians are the happiest people on earth.

No one actually believes that.

You’ve called us traitors and racists and rednecks and right wing extremists and right wing nut jobs and MAGA and ignorant and uneducated - which is fine, call us whatever you want.

But you’ve yet to give us an actual reason to stay which is just another reason for us to leave.

And that’s exactly what we’ll be voting for.

We want out.

We want our freedom.

Alberta independence is the path forward.

[Keith Wilson @ikwilson]

Say what you want about the convoy protests in Ottawa, but what happened to Tamara Lich should concern all of us.

Tamara took a stand during a difficult time in Canada. In response, she faced a level of enforcement that many believe was excessive and intended to discourage others from speaking out.

A grandmother. No criminal history. Yet treated as if she were a violent threat. A Canada-wide warrant issued for her arrest for an alleged bail breach and then locked up in jail without bail.

This isn’t just about one case. It’s about how far authorities can go when people challenge government decisions.

Now she’s in a legal fight that could set important precedents. If fairness, accountability, and civil liberties matter to you, this is worth supporting and watching closely. https://t.co/5n7JdevejN

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

Hello Julia, sans aucune ironie, c'est top que tu prennes le temps de te renseigner. Mais le problème quand on lit Marx aujourd'hui, c'est qu'on prend pour acquis sa prémisse de départ, alors qu'elle a été démontée scientifiquement il y a plus de 150 ans.

Toute la pensée de Marx repose sur la théorie de la valeur-travail. L'idée que la valeur d'un bien vient de la quantité de travail nécessaire pour le produire. Si tu acceptes cette prémisse, alors oui, tout son raisonnement tient. Le capitaliste "vole" la plus-value du travailleur, l'exploitation est mathématique, la révolution est inévitable.

Sauf qu'en 1871, trois économistes (Menger en Autriche, Jevons en Angleterre, Walras en Suisse) découvrent indépendamment la même chose : la valeur n'est pas objective, elle est subjective et marginale.

Un verre d'eau dans le désert vaut une fortune. Le même verre à côté d'une rivière ne vaut rien. Le travail incorporé est identique. Donc le travail ne détermine pas la valeur. C'est le consommateur qui valorise un bien selon son utilité marginale dans un contexte donné.

Exemple concret : tu peux passer 1000 heures à tricoter un pull moche que personne ne veut. Selon Marx, ce pull a énormément de valeur (beaucoup de travail incorporé). Selon la réalité, il ne vaut rien. Parce que personne n'en veut.

À l'inverse, Bernard Arnault crée des milliards de valeur non pas parce qu'il "exploite" mais parce qu'il a su anticiper et organiser des désirs humains à grande échelle. La valeur est créée par la coordination, pas extraite par le vol.

Cette découverte (la révolution marginaliste) a invalidé tout l'édifice marxiste. Pas pour des raisons idéologiques, pour des raisons scientifiques. C'est pour ça que plus aucun département d'économie sérieux au monde n'enseigne Marx comme un cadre d'analyse valide. On l'enseigne en histoire de la pensée.

Maintenant, le truc important. Si ton intention en lisant Marx c'est d'aider les pauvres (c'est une intention noble), alors tu vas être surprise par ce qui suit.

Regarde les chiffres de la Banque mondiale. En 1820, 90% de l'humanité vivait dans l'extrême pauvreté. Aujourd'hui, moins de 9%. Cette chute historique ne s'est PAS produite dans les pays qui ont appliqué Marx. Elle s'est produite dans les pays qui ont libéralisé leur économie.

Chine post-1978, Vietnam post-1986, Inde post-1991, Pologne post-1989. À chaque fois qu'un pays libéralise, des centaines de millions de gens sortent de la pauvreté en une génération. À chaque fois qu'un pays applique Marx (URSS, Cambodge, Corée du Nord, Venezuela), c'est la famine et les goulags.

Ce n'est pas une opinion, c'est l'expérience la plus massive jamais menée en sciences sociales. Plusieurs milliards de cobayes humains, sur un siècle.

Donc paradoxalement, si tu aimes vraiment les pauvres, la position la plus cohérente n'est pas d'être marxiste. C'est d'être pour la liberté économique. Parce que c'est empiriquement la seule chose qui a jamais sorti massivement les gens de la misère.

Pour creuser, je te recommande trois lectures qui vont changer ta vision :

"La Loi" de Frédéric Bastiat (court, lumineux, gratuit en ligne)
"La Route de la Servitude" de Hayek
"Économie en une leçon" de Henry Hazlitt
Bonne lecture, et vraiment chapeau de chercher à comprendre plutôt que de rester dans tes certitudes. C'est rare.

[Jeff Evely - the Magnanimous GenX'er Male @JeffEvely]

Woods win!

Apparently, our right to "Liberty" really does mean our ability to move freely, in a free country.

[Rise Of Alberta @RiseOfAlberta]

Every time Washington moves faster to support Alberta energy than Ottawa does, the case for Alberta independence gets stronger.

At this point, it is no longer theoretical.

Canada is the obstacle to Alberta’s prosperity.

Independence is how we clear the path.

[MamaB @truthwellout]

I am done with Canada. I have no desire to live in a dictatorship. I used to stress about it. I actually lost sleep. Now I don't care. I support a free and independent Alberta. Every single thing Carney does, solidifies our independence. Long live a free, sovereign Alberta.

[Erik Thorvaldsson @erik_thorvalds]

Democracy Is Already Dead in Canada: Alberta’s Independence Referendum Just Proved It

Yesterday, April 10, 2026, Justice Shaina Leonard of Alberta’s Court of King’s Bench handed down a one-month stay on the Stay Free Alberta petition.

Signature collection continues until May 2, but Elections Alberta is now barred from certifying those signatures or referring the matter to Justice Minister Mickey Amery.

The reason? First Nations groups like Sturgeon Lake Cree Nation and others claim the very act of asking Albertans a democratic question somehow violates treaty rights.

This isn’t law.

This is lawfare; the weaponization of the courts to strangle the will of the people before it can even be counted.

And it exposes the rotting core of Canadian “democracy”: when the results might threaten the Laurentian elite’s grip, the rules change overnight.

This is how it has always been between Canada and Alberta.

For decades we have been the golden goose bled dry for equalization cheques that fund bike lanes in Halifax and universities in Montréal while our energy sector is shackled by industrial carbon taxes, rejected pipelines, and federal “net-zero” fantasies that ignore physics and economics.

The National Energy Program in the ‘80s was just the overt chapter of a longer story: Ottawa extracts our wealth, regulates our prosperity into the ground, then lectures us about “national unity” when we dare complain.

Every time Alberta pushes back; whether on resource revenue, equalization formulas, or Senate reform—the answer is the same: courts, regulators, or political sleight-of-hand to keep the tap flowing eastward.

The floor-crossers in Ottawa propping up Carney’s Liberals are only the latest symptom. Confederation was always a lopsided deal sold to the West on promises of fairness that were never kept.

Alberta didn’t ask to bankroll the federation while being treated like a subordinate colony.

We built this land on grit, risk, and resource wealth.

Ottawa’s response has been extraction dressed up as solidarity.

And that is precisely why yesterday’s ruling is a sea change.

This isn’t fringe frustration anymore.

Albertans who once believed we could “vote our way out” of this mess; loyal CPC voters, mainstream conservatives, even some who rolled their eyes at sovereignty talk—are now waking up.

The petition smashed the 177,000-signature threshold early.

The stay isn’t killing momentum; it’s fuel.

People see the mask slip: when the democratic machinery threatens the status quo, the machinery is simply turned off.

More Albertans than ever are concluding the only way to protect our future is to build a new one.

Alberta isn’t “separatist.”

We’re exhausted.

Exhausted by a federation that takes our resources, mocks our values, and now uses the courts to silence our questions.

Yesterday wasn’t a setback. It was confirmation.

The roller coaster is just getting started.

The petition is still alive. The signatures are still pouring in.

And the conversation Albertans are having around kitchen tables, rig sites, and boardrooms has fundamentally shifted:

Independence is no longer unthinkable. It’s becoming inevitable.

Strap in, Alberta.

History doesn’t wait for judicial permission.

It is made by people who refuse to stay silent.

#AlbertaIndependence

[Rise Of Alberta @RiseOfAlberta]

YOU WILL drive gas-powered trucks

YOU WILL own the guns Ottawa hates

YOU WILL eat Alberta beef

YOU WILL afford a home

YOU WILL prosper

YOU WILL live free

YOU WILL defy the globalists

YOU WILL support Alberta independence

[Rob Schneider 🇺🇸 @RobSchneider]

FREE ALBERTA!

[Danielle Smith @ABDanielleSmith]

Alberta parents want their kids focused on the basics at school. Our government is not backing down on this.

The NDP don’t agree and based upon the “equity card” meltdowns from their recent convention, one can see why…

[Rise Of Alberta @RiseOfAlberta]

This is one of the clearest cases for Alberta independence you’ll hear.

It’s a long video, but it’s worth the watch. Keith Wilson breaks down, in practical and objective terms, why an independent Alberta would be stronger, freer, and better off.

[Tokyo Rosie @RosieRocks28]

Multi-millionaire living in the US comes to Canada to receive award, praise socialism and trash the US.

Said multi-millionaire then immediately leaves awards show to return to the US where she can pay lower taxes and marinate in her own hypocrisy.

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

As another man who once worked with me declares himself saddened by my beliefs on gender and sex, I thought it might be useful to compile a list for handy reference. Which of the following do you imagine makes actors and directors who aren’t involved with the HBO reboot of Harry Potter so miserable?

Is it my belief that women and girls should have their own public changing rooms and bathrooms?

That women should retain female-only rape crisis centres?

That men don’t belong in women’s sport?

That female prisoners shouldn’t be incarcerated with violent men and male sex offenders?

That women should remain a protected class in law, because they have sex-specific needs and issues?

That language should reflect reality rather than ideological jargon, especially in a medical context?

That women shouldn’t be harassed, persecuted or fired for refusing to pretend humans can change sex?

That women should not be threatened with violence and rape when they assert their rights?

That freedom of speech and belief are essential to a pluralistic democratic society?

That troubled minors, especially those who are gay, autistic and trauma-experienced, should be given mental health support instead of irreversible surgeries and drug treatments on non-existent evidence of benefit?

That gay people shouldn’t be pressured to include the opposite sex in their dating pools, nor should they be smeared as ‘genital fetishists’ when they don’t?

That cross-dressing heterosexual male fetishists aren’t actually oppressed, but having the time of their lives piggybacking off gender identity ideology?

That said ideology, and the privileged, blinkered fools pushing it because they suffer zero consequences themselves, have done more damage to the political left’s credibility than Trump and Farage could have achieved in a century?

Let me have your thoughts.