Honestly a good coach is not the one who coaches the best athletes. Those athletes are most likely going to improve regardless of coach.
A good coach is one that consistently helps develops athletes. That is one who inspires, teaches, and leads!
@FoxNews imagine hiring a ghost writer to not only publish factually incorrect material, since Riley Gaines got 6th ergo 5th sans Lia Thomas, but also failing to even CHECK to see if the article was written in the American english dialect. (Also the NCAA competes in yards not meters…..)
@BretWeinstein Amazing to watch people who say they care so much about women's sports just ignore the best women in the sport in the service of hyperbole.
A coach should fill these needs:
1. Being supported, not thwarted: having input, a voice, and a choice
2. The ability to make progress and to grow
3. Feeling connected to the team and mission, feeling like you belong
4. Have direction, meaning, & purpose
https://t.co/CvMkBaXome
12 tips when coaching teenagers. A thread.
1. Resist the temptation too get serious too soon. There's no need to drastically transform the coaching philosophy.
Some reasons for sports drop out include:
A. Change of coach
B. Change of coaching philosophy
C. Too competitive
IM training confuses me. Growing up all we did was swim lots of 200IMs or 100 IM. That’s boring and I question the efficacy of it. So are aerobic adaptations unique to each stroke? If so wouldn’t it be better to train separately and have “rehearsal” training sessions?
Our level of control changes how we respond to stress.
When we lack control, our stress spikes. When we have a sense that we can impact the situation, our cortisol response is dampened
Coaches need to model swimming after skill-based sports and not cyclical ones. Swimming more does not necessarily increase an athlete’s swimming economy; skill does.
@sato_daiki So I just realized it’s the “all that yardage — a look back” article by Doc Consilman so my comment might be blasphemous🫣. He poses the question of “building endurance by doing nothing but a series of sprints” and states he personally failed. There are a few logical leaps here.
Omg the author of this article on swim training just stated “I doubt it because I tried it about 25 years ago with disastrous results” 🚩🚩🚩🚩. Personal anecdote is not evidence!! If you talk about research then you also have to consider the implementation of the training 😫😫
I’m reading an ASCA article from 2008 and the author just referred to “high quality or more intense practice methods” as anaerobic training. Bruh that’s just straight up FALSE. Physiologic adaptations occur at the cellular level so 60x25 All Out with a 1:4 W2R ratio is aerobic!!