Aronnette

Medical Missionary | Soc. Media Manager | Loctician - Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth..

[Wide Awake Media @wideawake_media]

"What was considered acceptable cholesterol in 1960 was 300, then 240, then 200."

"Every time they lower that number, another 50 million Americans need drugs. That's not medicine. That's marketing."

"For every 1,000 healthy people who take statins, they prevent exactly one heart attack. The other 999 just get side effects."

"When researchers studied people over the age of 60, those with higher cholesterol lived longer. Not shorter, longer."

"But your conventional doctor doesn't know this because... the very guidelines they follow are written by Big Pharma."

[Camus @newstart_2024]

Tim Dillon had a brutally funny take on Gen Z’s approach to work.

He says a lot of them have figured out the whole system feels like a scam, so they’re treating it like one. Fake mental health days, quiet quitting, weaponizing HR language, doing the bare minimum while demanding maximum accommodation.

And Tim’s reaction? “I’m for it.” They’re just using the playbook society handed them.

This is what happens when trust in institutions and old-school work ethic collapses. People stop playing the game seriously and start playing the system instead.

Do you think Gen Z is smart for gaming a broken system, or is this approach ultimately making things worse?

[Sall Grover @salltweets]

If the government will force you to accept men as women, they can force you to accept anything. What’s next?

[Aronnette @Aronnette]

@ZubyMusic People try to be descent because of laws and regulations that restrict us. Take those away and there's chaos..

[Camus @newstart_2024]

Helen Andrews dropped a fascinating observation on The Daily Signal:

Law schools tipped majority female in 2016. Medical schools and university professors followed in just the last five years. The entire white-collar workforce and college-educated workers in America are now majority female. Management positions are at 46% and climbing.

Some fields have gone way further: veterinary medicine is around 80% female, psychology PhDs are 75% female. And instead of leveling off at roughly 50/50, many of these spaces just keep getting more female over time.

This feels like more than simple “women outcompeting men.” When fields pass parity and keep shifting dramatically, it suggests something cultural is happening, and it’s worth understanding honestly, not through slogans.

These aren’t random jobs. They’re shaping law, medicine, education, media, and culture. Long-term shifts in who dominates these institutions could change how they function in subtle but important ways.

What do you make of it - mostly positive progress, or something we should be looking at more carefully?

[PeterSweden @PeterSweden7]

WOW.

4 months ago Moderna began work on an mRNA vaccine against Ebola including the Bundibugyo strain.

Now there's an outbreak of the Bundibugyo strain and WHO has declared a global health emergency.

Moderna seem to always be ahead.

[Ihtesham Ali @ihtesham2005]

A Norwegian neuroscientist spent 20 years proving that the act of writing by hand changes the human brain in ways typing physically cannot, and almost nobody outside her field has read the paper.

Her name is Audrey van der Meer.

She runs a brain research lab in Trondheim, and the paper that closed the argument was published in 2024 in a journal called Frontiers in Psychology. The finding is brutal enough that it should have changed every classroom on Earth.

The experiment was simple. She recruited 36 university students and put each one in a cap with 256 sensors pressed against their scalp to record brain activity. Words flashed on a screen one at a time.

Sometimes the students wrote the word by hand on a touchscreen using a digital pen, and sometimes they typed the same word on a keyboard. Every neural response was recorded for the full five seconds the word stayed on screen.

Then her team looked at the part of the data most researchers had ignored for years, which is how different parts of the brain were communicating with each other during the task.

When the students wrote by hand, the brain lit up everywhere at once.

The regions responsible for memory, sensory integration, and the encoding of new information were all firing together in a coordinated pattern that spread across the entire cortex. The whole network was awake and connected.

When the same students typed the same word, that pattern collapsed almost completely.

Most of the brain went quiet, and the connections between regions that had been alive seconds earlier were nowhere to be found on the EEG.

Same word, same brain, same person, and two completely different neurological events.

The reason turned out to be something nobody had really paid attention to before her work. Writing by hand is not one motion but a sequence of thousands of tiny micro-movements coordinated with your eyes in real time, where each letter is a different shape that requires the brain to solve a slightly different spatial problem.

Your fingers, wrist, vision, and the parts of your brain that track position in space are all working together to produce one letter, then the next, then the next.

Typing throws all of that away. Every key on a keyboard requires the exact same finger motion regardless of which letter you are pressing, which means the brain has almost nothing to integrate and almost no problem to solve.

Van der Meer said it plainly in her interviews.

Pressing the same key with the same finger over and over does not stimulate the brain in any meaningful way, and she pointed out something that should scare every parent who handed their kid an iPad.

Children who learn to read and write on tablets often cannot tell letters like b and d apart, because they have never physically felt with their bodies what it takes to actually produce those letters on a page.

A decade before her, two researchers at Princeton ran the same fight using a completely different method and ended up at the same answer. Pam Mueller and Daniel Oppenheimer tested 327 students across three experiments, where half took notes on laptops with the internet disabled and half took notes by hand, before testing everyone on what they actually understood from the lectures they had watched.

The handwriting group won by a wide margin on every question that required real understanding rather than surface recall.

The reason was hiding in the transcripts of what the two groups had actually written down.

The laptop students typed almost word for word, capturing more total content but processing almost none of it as they went, while the handwriting students physically could not write fast enough to transcribe a lecture in real time, which forced them to listen carefully, decide what actually mattered, and put it in their own words on the page.

That single act of choosing what to keep was the learning itself, and the keyboard had quietly skipped the choosing and skipped the learning along with it.

Two studies. Two countries. Same answer.

Handwriting makes the brain work. Typing lets it coast.

Every note you have ever typed instead of written went into your brain through a thinner pipe. Every meeting, every book highlight, every idea you captured on your phone instead of on paper was processed at half depth.

You did not forget those things because your memory is bad. You forgot them because typing never woke the part of the brain that would have made them stick.

The fix is the thing your grandmother already knew.

Pick up a pen. Write the thing down. The slower road is the faster one.

[Rukshan Fernando @therealrukshan]

🚨 BREAKING: Australian Federal Court rules ‘trans women’ are REAL women

Devastating loss for biological Australian women as Federal Court dismisses appeal in Giggle v Tickle, awards damages and rules in favour of 'trans woman' wanting access to women-only spaces.

Full report: https://t.co/0lH7YkS44Q

[Amy E. Sousa, MA Depth Psychology @KnownHeretic]

The Martha Talks Program is done by a woman @MarthaTalks who goes into the livestreams of men who claim trans identities and asks them nicely to “please stay out of women’s spaces.”

She has hundreds of videos posted. All of their answers reveal how these men do not respect women, they think they are superior to other men, and that they get a free pass to violate women’s boundaries.

Their answers also reveal that they KNOW they scare women and girls and that they go out of their way to do just that. These men are MORE predatory than other men, not less.

These men have weak internal boundaries, weak impulse control, and lack the ability to self regulate. They feel entitled to do whatever they want, whenever they want.

These men also believe there is nothing we can do to stop them. THEY ARE WRONG.

If you like my work, please consider becoming a paid subscriber on one of my platforms. Just 99 cents/month on Facebook and instagram. $2.99/month on X, and $6.47/month or $59.64/year on Substack

[Jesse Watters @JesseBWatters]

🚨 BREAKING: A CIA WHISTLEBLOWER JUST TESTIFIED THAT THE LAB LEAK WAS “COVERED UP” — FAUCI’S ROLE WAS “INTENTIONAL” 💣

FAUCI’S COVID STORY IS COLLAPSING! 😳

[Sall Grover @salltweets]

As we approach the Giggle v Tickle decision, I’m remembering that

• I received an Australian Human Rights Commission complain citing “gender identity discrimination” when I was 14/15 weeks pregnant.

• The AHRC was, imo, never neutral. It was gender ideology capture from the very beginning. While they were talking about “assigned sex at birth” and “lived experience”, I was 20 weeks pregnant & found out I was having a girl.

• To settle the complaint in the AHRC - and not have it escalate to federal court - I had to • agree to let him on the woman only social networking app I created • a
let all men who claim to be women on the app • apologize • attend “sex & gender education classes • pay $20,000 • moderate all content on the woman only platform so men who claim to be women weren’t offended by it.

• The AHRC never meaningfully entertained my argument that woman only spaces were lawful. I always felt that their stance was, “you’re guilty, admit it, accept it.”

• While contemplating the magnitude of what I had to do, I thought about my daughter & that I would eventually be teaching her to stand up for herself & do what is right. How could I do that if I ran away when something seemed too hard?

• I said “NO” to what the AHRC was offering. Tickle filed in federal court 60 days later and “Tickle v Giggle” began.

• A federal court case + full appeal & my daughter is about to turn 4 years old. Giggle v Tickle has been in the background of her whole life. Any time the case has been incredibly stressful - and there have been many times, I was losing my hair at one point - I have just focused on my daughter & it instantly became easier. I want her to have rights & will do everything I can to ensure that she does.

• I want every woman & girl to be able to say “NO” to a man, no matter how he identifies, and not be punished for it.

• At no point in the past 4.5 years have I been even remotely convinced that men can be women. Not once. In fact, I’m more sure than ever that they’re not.

• Thank you everyone for the support. It would be impossible to have this fight without it.

https://t.co/5qxNEfrSVj 🩷

[US Homeland Security News @defense_civil25]

🚨Information: The law providing pharmaceutical companies with complete immunity from liability for ALL vaccine-related injuries is the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986!

I will NOT take another vaccine until this law is repealed and pharmaceutical companies can be held accountable for the damage and death they cause!

[Aronnette @Aronnette]

@WomenReadWomen @RoeliendenOuden @reduxx Where can we find this text?

[Nicolas Hulscher, MPH @NicHulscher]

BREAKING: LANDMARK PEER-REVIEWED STUDY FINDS VACCINATION IS A MAJOR RISK FACTOR FOR AUTISM

We found 79% of studies evaluating vaccines or their components (107 of 136) reported evidence consistent with a vaccine–autism link.

After DECADES of censorship and denial, our 50-page analysis of more than 300 studies provides one of the most comprehensive syntheses to date on the possible causes of autism.

The paper is now officially PEER-REVIEWED and PUBLISHED in the Journal of Independent Medicine.

Autism’s rise is multifactorial—but routine childhood vaccination emerged as a MAJOR modifiable risk factor within the broader causal framework.

We found potential determinants of new-onset autism before age 9 to include:

👵 Older parents (>35 years mother, >40 years father)
👶 Premature delivery (<37 weeks)
🧬 Common genetic variants
🧩 Siblings with autism
🔥 Maternal immune activation
💊 In utero drug exposure
☣️ Environmental toxicants
🦠 Gut–brain axis alterations
💉 Combination routine childhood vaccination

Of 136 studies evaluating vaccines or their components:
➡️ 107 (79%) found evidence consistent with a vaccine–autism link
➡️ 29 reported “no association,” yet lacked unvaccinated controls and were riddled with major flaws
➡️ 12 studies comparing fully vaccinated vs. completely unvaccinated children found every time that the unvaccinated had superior overall health outcomes and substantially lower autism risk

Biologic mechanisms converged on shared pathways—including immune dysregulation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and neuroinflammation—triggered by clustered and early-timed vaccination during critical windows of brain development.

By evaluating all known risk factors side by side, this analysis uniquely clarifies the relative contribution of vaccination compared to genetic and environmental domains. No prior review has attempted this integrative scope without excluding positive vaccine-association studies or unvaccinated controls—an essential step in determining whether vaccines truly play a role in autism risk, and if so, how significant that role may be within the broader causal landscape.

This publication represents a major breakthrough through the longstanding censorship imposed by the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex on the issue of vaccination and autism. It also marks Dr. Andrew Wakefield’s first major return to the peer-reviewed scientific literature in years—after enduring decades of attacks from the vaccine cartel.

CONCLUSION:
The totality of evidence supports a multifactorial model of ASD in which genetic predisposition, neuroimmune biology, environmental toxicants, perinatal stressors, and iatrogenic exposures converge to produce the phenotype of a post-encephalitic state.

Combination and early-timed routine childhood vaccination represents a significant modifiable risk factor for ASD within a broader multifactorial framework, supported by convergent mechanistic, clinical, and epidemiologic findings, and characterized by intensified use, the clustering of multiple doses during critical neurodevelopmental windows, and the lack of research on the cumulative safety of the full pediatric schedule.

@McCulloughFund @P_McCulloughMD @DrAndyWakefield @Honest_Medicine @CPriceRogers @KirstinCosgrove @NathanMeadPhD @BreCraven_PA @MilaLRad

[Valerie Anne Smith @ValerieAnne1970]

FDA DIRECTOR ADMITS THIMEROSAL MERCURY WAS NEVER SAFETY TESTED

Our KIDS have been INJECTED with UNTESTED MERCURY for DECADES!

Thimerosal — the toxic mercury preservative injected into baby vaccines since 1929 — has **never** undergone safety testing for use in healthy infants.

Their only “study”?
A 1929 experiment on 27 patients who were already dying from meningitis… and every single one died anyway.

No long-term trials.
No data on developing brains.
No proof it’s safe at all.

Yet it was pumped into millions of children for generations anyway.

This isn’t science. It’s criminal negligence.

Why are we still risking our babies’ neurological health in 2026?

[Electroverse @Electroversenet]

Onshore wind is sold as 25-year infrastructure, but a UK and Denmark study found that after just 10 years.

The average UK wind farm loses roughly one-third of its output. Then by 12 to 15 years, many become completely uneconomic to run.

Less power, more wear, higher maintenance.

So the farms need "repowering," they call it. That means ripping out old machines and replacing them early. So more steel, more blades shipped in from China, more waste and more subsidies.

The 25-year lifespan claim was short enough, but in reality, turbines are barely lasting a decade.

[Aronnette @Aronnette]

@Rach4Patriarchy Or just use wild yam cream for (peri)menopause. It's natural and no prescription needed! Make sure you buy the real thing though, Barbara https://t.co/NRWyPUwVXp sells it.

[Camus @newstart_2024]

What if the biggest “win” for families in the last 50 years was actually a trap?

Rory Sutherland dropped this on Alex O’Connor’s podcast: The two-income household started as a nice option. Both partners work, more money comes in. Feels great at first.

Then reality shifted. Governments got double the tax. Existing homeowners watched their property values soar. House prices rose to match two salaries.

Suddenly one income wasn’t enough anymore — even for high-earning singles like consultant surgeons. Families traded ~35 hours of free time per week for only modest gains in lifestyle.

What began as freedom quietly became an obligation. And it left single people and parents who want to raise their own kids at a real disadvantage.

This one stings because we sold it as pure progress.

Personally, it makes me question how many modern “upgrades” we’ve normalized without counting the real cost — especially lost time with family.

What’s something you once thought was clear progress that now feels like it came with a heavier price than we admitted?

[Aronnette @Aronnette]

@EvaVlaar @UKOrdinariate Have you read The Great Controversy by Ellen G. White? Is echt een aanrader!

[Camus @newstart_2024]

Helen Andrews just said what a lot of people have been noticing but won’t say out loud:

Wokeness isn’t really about ideology.
It’s feminization.

It stormed into NASCAR, the NFL, and Wall Street — the last places you’d expect — and the pattern was unmistakable: women are far more likely to shut down speakers they disagree with, while men say “I disagree, but let him speak.”

She argues wokeness is female group dynamics hardwired into institutions, replacing open debate with social enforcement and emotional harmony.

Why it matters: We’re trading sharp truth-seeking and real argument for conflict-avoidance and speech policing. That quiet shift is reshaping how every institution actually works.

This one landed because I’ve watched the exact change happen in places I’ve worked and hung out — more tone-policing, less willingness to clash over ideas. Not about blaming women, just seeing the pattern clearly.

Do you think wokeness is more about feminization of institutional culture than pure ideology — or is that framing off base?