I think people were shocked at both the attack and the retaliation. My reaction was What did Hamas expect?
However, what followed was irrespective of how disproportionate the retaliation was, it was impossible to criticise Israel without being challenged to first denounce Hamas. ‘Do you denounce Hamas?!?!’ became the mantra. For many who do not support violence, it was not possible to condemn people who have tried peaceful protest and seen it result in death and injury. Throughout history, people oppressed, dehumanised and humiliated for generations resort to violence against their oppressors. When options have long been exhausted (Rachid Khalidi’s 100 Year War on Palestine documents in great detail how all attempts at diplomacy and a solution were sabotaged), and it is clear to them there is no escape from oppression and a death-by-culling beloved of successive Israeli regimes, they will resort to violence - risking their own death and killing others.
It is a moral question we have all grappled with. I can understand a refusal to condemn Hamas even among those who can’t support killing of any kind.
X engineers have seemingly altered Grok’s code after the chatbot briefly lauded Hitler, identified the Jews as the cause of anti-White hate, and referred to itself as “MechaHitler.”
The AI chatbot now claims the whole thing was a sarcastic display.
Follow: @AFpost
If any lawyers want to sue X and do some really fun discovery on why Grok is suddenly publishing violent rape fantasies about members of the public, I'm more than game
Don't stay silent, don't ignore what's happening to us. We want to stay alive.💔
If you are interested in us, reply with your country's flag. 🍉🇵🇸
https://t.co/dxpwf6lrZD
@RachelRileyRR Keep reposting the zionazi vomit Rachel. The world sees you and understands who the real antisemites are (clue: it isn't Jeremy Corbyn or the Labour Left).