AskHGN

Bored

[Dragon kingdom.wu🌃 @loongkingdom]

My anatomy teacher told us: The human bones in Chinese bodies are 204 in number, so they are called the "human race". Other races have 206 bones and their evolution is incomplete, so they are called "humans". It means something that is similar to a human but not fully developed.

[AskHGN @AskHGN]

@loongkingdom Please post the full clip, I want to enjoy the scenery

[Johannes Maria @luo_yuehan]

China Becomes the World's Leading Tourism Economy in 2026

[苏里格 @szslg]

华强买瓜，爵士版。

[Love Music @khnh80044]

43 years ago, Michael Jackson stepped onto the stage in that fedora and gave the world the moonwalk for the very first time 🕺✨
A legendary Billie Jean performance that still feels untouchable today 🔥🔥

[AskHGN @AskHGN]

@r0ck3t23 Ok, Jensen Huang also one of the best mind, and he is also Chinnese by Blood, So He just talk about how mighty is his race right? Self worshipper

[Nury Vittachi @NuryVittachi]

BOOKMARK, COPY OR DOWNLOAD THIS. Every time someone says “but the Iranians massacred 30,000 or 50,000 of their own peaceful protesters”, just share these 10 facts and/or the video.

1. In early January, Mossad and CIA assets armed radical opposition members in Iran to undertake an armed insurrection in which 3,000 people (on all sides) lost their lives. There’s plenty of video evidence for that.

2. That was turned into a fake massacre story of 30,000 or 50,000 or 70,000 victims, by so called “activist groups”, widely quoted, as fact, by the western mainstream media—although no evidence was provided. A simple investigation shows that every single one of these groups can be traced back to the US or its “five eyes” partners, the UK and Canada.

3. The western mainstream started pushing the fake story by quoting from a group called Human Rights in Iran, which is not in Iran—it’s from Virginia, home of the CIA, and is financed by the NED, the CIA’s soft-power spin off.

4. The fake news was backed up by a group called the Center for Human Rights in Iran, which is also NOT in Iran, and is also in the US.

5. Another group, Iran International, can be traced back to the UK.

6. Then there was the International Center for Human Rights, which turned out to be in Canada.

7. Still other sources backing the fake massacre turned out to be supporters of America’s Reza Pahlava (Juan Guaido II), such as the one quoted by Time magazine.

8. The most quoted person on western mainstream television is Masih Alinejad, who said “millions” were massacred. She worked for many years as a full-time anti-Iran propagandist, with financing from the NED and a salary from Voice of America.

9. The fake tale was further pushed by the Bouramond Center for Human Rights, another group financed by the NED, and

10. Tavaana, started by the US State Department and financed by USAID, a notorious group that disguises CIA politicking as aid.

Those are the facts.

Now here’s the key question: why does every western mainstream media group, not most, but…

Every.

Single.

One.

hide the above facts from their audiences?

Delete the western mainstream media.

Find out the truth for yourself.

[Manju Asura @mandate2049]

Taiwan people are Chinese, not hot headed Slavs. They won’t die for America and Global Jewry, unlike Slavs.
When the invasion starts all Taiwan (KMT) officers will surrender to the PLA in 5 minutes. Everybody in Taiwan and China alike knows that.

[Tuki @TukiFromKL]

The last time a Chinese lab open-sourced something this big, Nvidia lost $600 billion in a single day.

It's happening again.

DeepSeek panicked Silicon Valley in January. Crashed Nvidia's stock $600B in one day. Made Sam Altman rewrite his entire business plan.

Now there's a second one.

Kimi just made AI notably cheaper to run. Open-sourced it. Put it out for free. Meanwhile OpenAI is asking people to pay $200 a month to use a model that already feels behind the curve.

Two Chinese labs. Both open source. Both doing more with less. Both giving away for free what American companies charge billions for.

The AI race isn't US vs China anymore... It's closed vs open. And closed is losing.

And the wildest part? Nobody in Silicon Valley will quote tweet this.. Because admitting a Chinese lab just moved the field forward for free destroys the entire "we need $10B to build AGI" fundraising pitch.

[AskHGN @AskHGN]

@interesting_aIl Is it save to put your phone on it? Will it erase the data in your device?

[AskHGN @AskHGN]

@khnh80044 The first baby: Ok let we eat the tape, maybe its delicious as milk

[Orbán Viktor @PM_ViktorOrban]

.@vonderleyen has once again asked the member states for additional funds to finance Ukraine and the war.

What exactly does this mean?

The President of the Commission is asking for nothing less than an additional €135 billion over 2 years. This is 65% of Hungary’s annual economic output, 7 years of pensions from all Hungarian pensioners, and nearly 3/4 of the EU’s annual budget.

An astronomical sum that does not exist today. It simply does not exist.

The Brusselian "magic trick" would once again be a joint European loan, a move that would ensure even our grandchildren would be burdened with repaying the costs of the Russian-Ukrainian war.

They're asking us, Hungarians, to contribute to this. A country that's fined €1 million/day because we do not let migrants in. A country that's financially punished because it has its own position on the war and on gender ideology.

This is more than impossible. This is categorically absurd. Hungary’s response will come without delay.

[AskHGN @AskHGN]

@XH_Lee23 Just send jessy pinkman

[AskHGN @AskHGN]

@chengfeng0485 Happy Birthday

[AskHGN @AskHGN]

@jacksonhinkle @grok how many china highrise building compare to US?

[Nury Vittachi @NuryVittachi]

MI6 PLAN TO CUT CHINA INTO THREE COUNTRIES

BREAKING NEWS: Unearthed documents show that MI6, the British spy service, planned to cut China into three separate countries. The British plan was formulated as recently as the 1990s—and part of it is STILL RUNNING NOW.

This is an extraordinary story which researchers uncovered from historical documents, and which was presented at a university conference recently. Full details with sources are in the video report. Summary of 15 key points are below.

1.) In the early 1990s, agents at British spy agency MI6 consulted UK academic Gerald Segal of the Royal Institute of International Affairs on how to chop China into three countries.

2.) The UK’s key players would be Uyghur separatists. “Xinjiang has long been a target of British intelligence— with London hoping to manipulate the Uighur refugees from Xinjiang and Uighurs still there, into cannon fodder for London's plans to break up China…” (Journal of Strategic Studies).

3.) Enter a real-life secret agent—a Turkish man named Catli of the Grey Wolves, who shared MI6 goals in Xinjiang. A book about a related CIA venture called Operation Gladio said Catli “helped the Uyghurs… mount insurrectionary attacks that killed 162 people”.

4.) To understand this story, it’s vital to know that the west falsely presents an image of Xinjiang as a place where one ethnic group are prisoners and the other are oppressive overlords. Not true. In Xinjiang, people with Uyghur background can commonly be found as police officers, army soldiers, and local officials, including the ones right at the top—chairman of the regional government.

5.) In March 1992, the chairman of the regional government, Tomur Dawamat, issued a warning: “Hostile forces, both at home and abroad, have stepped up their infiltration, subversion and sabotage.”

6.) At the time, the CIA was backing separatist Isa Yusef Alptekin, another backer of the Grey Wolves. In a 1992 speech he said: "The time for collapse and dissolution has arrived for the Chinese empire.”

7.) The Americans gave his son Erkin Alptekin a job in US anti-China propaganda. In the 1990s, he worked for Radio Liberty, a US media propaganda unit, part of the Radio Free Asia cluster.

8.) By 1994, academic Gerald Segal had finished the map showing how to cut China into three countries. The US had already circulated stories of a “Tibetan genocide” to prepare for this.

9.) As part of their Central Asian program, the US had devoted hundreds of millions of dollars to get the mujahideen rebels to train groups of guerilla fighters. They added hundreds of Xinjiang separatists to join the training.

(This project eventually backfired for the Americans – the central Asian guerilla groups they were financing give birth to al-Qaeda, ISIS and the Taliban.)

10.) Western forces worked further with secret agent Catli, who created more trouble in Central Asia and China. But he made lots of enemies and was killed in a suspicious car crash in Turkey in 1996.

11.) From 1996 to 2002, other agents continued to train Uyghur separatists in China, who went on to make multiple terrorist attacks. FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds later wrote: “Between 1996 and 2002, we, the United States, planned, financed, and helped execute every single uprising and terror-related scheme in Xinjiang.”

(This US government denies this.)

12.) Problems arose for the western agents: UN data showed that the Tibetan population was growing faster than other Chinese groups– the opposite of a genocide.

Also, there was also growing public knowledge that the “Tibet exiles/ Dalai Lama” project in India had been set up and financed by the CIA.

So the “cut-China-into-three” plan became “cut-China-into-two”.

13.) In 2004, the US hosted the founding of East Turkistan as “a country”. For convenience, they decided to have the prime minister in Washington DC instead of China, selecting a man named Anwar Jusuf Turani from Fairfax, Virginia. The new “country” did not get international recognition by anyone – not even the United States!

14.) Between 2007 and 2014, there were a large number of terrorist attacks in China by members of the East Turkistan project the west had encouraged into being. In a 2009 operation, separatists used Facebook to co-ordinate a massive attack in which 197 people died. In another, a huge car bomb in Urumqi killed 43 people and wounded 94. At Kunming’s train station, an attack by eight knife-wielding terrorists killed 29 people and wounded 140.

Xinjiang’s leaders, with help from the central government, sent in police officers and soldiers to halt the carnage—and, against extraordinary odds, succeeded.

15.) In the 20-teens, it was time for the Americans to use their superpower – narrative control. They needed to do three things:

i) Get journalists and academics to cut all mentions of MI6 or CIA involvement in Chinese Uyghur stories.

ii) Trick the public into seeing the terrorists who had killed so many innocent people as the oppressed victims.

iii) Mislead everyone into believing that the authorities trying to stop the murder of innocents were the root cause of the problem.

Creating this new, upside-down narrative may sound like a tall order – but, incredibly, they managed to attain all three goals.

They did this by relentless circulation of mainstream media news reports which painted a picture in which “oppression” by “the Chinese” had “created” the violence. (See the video for detailed examples.)

The US then organized a 2019 meeting in Washington to relaunch the debunked “Tibet genocide” narrative as a Uyghur genocide hoax.

The story continues.

[Maddie Evans @EstieMaddie]

EXCUSE ME….. WHAT?? 😳

Just when you think that you have the smallest bit of talent, you see something like this! 🙌🏼🙌🏼🙌🏼

[AskHGN @AskHGN]

@AVGirl4Life Fcuk

[Yishan @yishan]

The typical belief was that with China’s One-Child policy, each child would bear the burden of supporting two parents and four grandparents, and this would result in disaster.

Apparently something else is happening: because China has been accumulating wealth and has high rates of household savings, single children (i.e. all of them) are increasingly able to be *supported by* the modest wealth accumulated by their parents (and grandparents), and many of them don’t need to work.

This is contributing to the “high youth unemployment” numbers, a stat that would normally imply social discontent, except that in this case the “unemployed” are rather satisfied or at least ok with their lot.

There are in fact jobs, but increasing numbers of middle-class young people don’t take them because they look down on them. But because China manages its economy to relentlessly drive down the cost of basic goods, these young people are able to live relatively fine lives supported by their parents - aided by the fact that there’s only a single child to support.

In the US, there’s a similar phenomenon of young people who don’t want to do certain classes of jobs, but surviving on a parents’ largesse is harder because the cost of living in the US is rising.

This is a surprising result, and if enough people (in China; but it could be the case in US with different economic policy) have the parental savings to do this, coupled with the coming automation of robots supercharging prosperity and reducing material costs of living to near zero, the previously-feared “demographic disaster” could potentially end up being - if not nothing - then at least not at all disaster.

Certainly the predictions were that by now China should be suffering from huge numbers of excess young men causing problems but they aren’t. Instead they’re just going abroad to other countries like Russia and finding wives, apparently because the gender skew is in the opposite direction there, and Russian men are drunks and Chinese men make good money (relatively speaking).