WAtrades

[Katharine Birbalsingh @Miss_Snuffy]

Age 11 - feel free to block puberty.

But whatever you do, don’t go on social media until you are 16.

We have lost our bloody minds. 🤯😵‍💫

[Konstantin Kisin @KonstantinKisin]

It genuinely amused me that people think replacing Starmer will make things better.

From Boris Johnson's election onwards, we've been shuffling the bollards on the Titanic.

You have to actually change direction if you want to avoid crashing into the iceberg:

- End Net Zero
- Make business viable again
- Get welfare under control
- Fund defence
- Ensure equality under the law
- Arrest criminals and keep them in jail
- Deport illegal immigrants and close the border
- Bring the civil service to heel

Burnham will become as unpopular as Starmer within months since he isn't going to do any of that.

[James Esses @JamesEsses]

A reminder that Andy Burnham is a full-blown gender ideologue.

As Mayor of Greater Manchester, he oversaw £100,000 of funding for an organisation helping children to get puberty blockers.

Labour cannot be trusted on child safeguarding.

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

The EU Acted. Hungary Acted. The US Acted. Britain Signed Hotel Contracts Until 2039.

Yesterday the European Parliament voted 418 to 218 to pass the strictest returns legislation in EU history. The lead negotiator described it as the final missing piece of Europe's migration system. After almost twenty years of standstill, he said, Europe finally has effective return measures. The vote followed the Chișinău Declaration of 15 May, signed by all 46 Council of Europe member states, pushing back against the European Court of Human Rights' increasingly expansive interpretation of migration law. Europe's governments, operating inside the ECHR framework, have decided they have had enough of judicial overreach. They are acting anyway.

Britain's removal rate for illegal arrivals stands at 4%. The EU's removal rate, the number so catastrophically low it triggered yesterday's emergency legislation, stands at 20%. Britain is removing at one fifth the rate of a system the EU itself just declared broken beyond tolerance. While announcing it wants to stop the boats, the Home Office has signed accommodation contracts for asylum seekers running until 2039. A government that intends to remove people does not contract for 15 years of housing them.

The standard explanation is the ECHR. Ministers have cited it for years as the primary obstacle to removal, the external constraint that ties Britain's hands regardless of political will. It is worth examining that claim against the Court's own published data. Of more than 430,000 applications processed by the ECHR in the past decade, fewer than 2% concerned immigration. Of those, over 92% were dismissed. Fewer than 450 cases, one in every thousand applications to the Court, resulted in a finding of human rights violation on immigration grounds.

The obstacle is not in Strasbourg. It is in Chancery Lane. The domestic immigration tribunal system, staffed in part by judges whose documented backgrounds lie in open-borders advocacy, produces rulings that no democratically elected parliament ever intended and that the ECHR itself would not require. And the institutional machinery surrounding it ensures that challenging any of this carries consequences. A new Islamophobia definition, opposed by the government's own former anti-extremism adviser and by the Equality and Human Rights Commission, is being embedded across every school, hospital, broadcaster and public body in the country. Two-tier policing, documented in Hampshire's own Race Action Plan and in the College of Policing's guidance, conditions officers to treat a racism accusation as the primary fact requiring response. The framework does not just permit the embedding of mass migration. It is designed to make objecting to it a disciplinary matter.

The EU has now demonstrated, within the ECHR framework, that effective returns legislation is achievable. Hungary has demonstrated that a 4% removal rate is a political choice, not a legal inevitability. The United States has demonstrated that border crossings can be reduced from 1.6 million to under 240,000 within months of a government deciding to act. Every external constraint Britain's government cites as the reason it cannot act has now been dismantled by other governments operating under comparable or identical legal obligations.

Mass immigration is not an act of nature managed by people smugglers. It is a policy choice sustained by successive governments across thirty years, maintained by an institutional framework that classifies concern about it as extremism, and defended by a legal excuse that the EU just voted 418 to 218 to stop hiding behind.

The smugglers did not build this system. The government did. Yesterday, 418 members of the European Parliament decided they had had enough of pretending otherwise. Britain's government has not.

"Mass immigration is not an act of nature managed by people smugglers. It is a policy choice sustained by successive governments across thirty years"

[Darren Grimes @darrengrimes]

The NHS is going to start recruiting kids to test life altering drugs on.

Experimenting on kids is vile.

[Dennis Noel Kavanagh @Jebadoo2]

This is live experimentation on a very vulnerable cohort that will leave them without sexual function, cognitively impaired and with reduced bone density.

[Stuey Beef 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @stuey_beef]

If Vladimir Putin changed the voting system days before an election to stop his opponents winning, every British journalist would call it what it is: rigging the rules.

Tonight, Labour rammed through a last‑minute switch in the Lords so that if Andy Burnham wins Makerfield and quits as Greater Manchester Mayor, his replacement won’t be chosen on a simple first‑past‑the‑post ballot, but on the supplementary vote system instead.

Why now?

Because Labour knows the race to replace Burnham would be a straight two‑horse fight with Reform UK – and under FPTP, the candidate with the most votes wins, no second chances, no back‑room redistributions, no “stop Reform” stitch‑ups.

Under SV, Labour gets a second bite of the cherry: if their candidate can limp into the top two, they can hoover up second preferences from every other party and magic a “majority” on the second count, even if Reform tops the poll on first preferences.

This isn’t “modernising democracy”. It’s the governing party using its Commons majority and the unelected Lords to hurriedly doctor the rules of one specific contest because it’s terrified the voters might choose someone else.

When the establishment preached to the world about “rules‑based order”, they forgot to mention one thing: in Britain, the rules are “based” on whether Labour thinks it might lose.

[Konstantin Kisin @KonstantinKisin]

The ban on social media for children under 16 is an idea that has merits. But the way it is being done is simply a way to force everyone, including adults, to identify themselves online, creating the most powerful surveillance and censorship architecture in human history.

[Kevin Bass @kevinnbass]

Henry Nowak is murdered by an immigrant, his family, and the police.

A man is nearly beheaded by an immigrant.

A report shows 250,000 UK children have been raped by immigrants.

UK PM Keir Starmer responds with a social media ban, digital ID, and proposed VPN ban.

Why? He wants the Muslim vote.

A sick man.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

The Rape Gang Inquiry - what happens next.

I intend to use my parliamentary privilege to name perpetrators and their enablers in the chamber.

This will be done incredibly carefully with our legal team involved every step of the way to ensure that no future prosecutions are jeopardised.

We are cooperating with the authorities in order to help cases be opened and reopened, but my faith in the system to independently deliver justice is not high...

That is why we are pursuing private prosecutions and civil litigation.

A target list has been identified, and it continues to grow.

This all has to be handled very carefully, for obvious reasons, but I am determined to act. We have had enough talk, now we need to act.

Our aim is straightforward.

Put people in prison. Deliver justice. Finally.

We will act. Not talk.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Censorship always comes with a “protect the children” lie

[S A M M Y Woodhouse @officialsammyuk]

This morning, I appeared on Good Morning Britain in a live interview about the grooming gangs. Before I went on air, I was told not to mention the race of the perpetrators. I, of course, didn’t listen.

I have now received an apology from the editor.

My interview is below: 👇🏻

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

135 British MPs are fighting guidance that would deny ‘Paula’ the right to enter women’s and girls’ changing rooms.

[Talk @TalkTV]

"They are scum. Using the death of our children to pass laws to censor the public."

Mark Kenevan, whose 13-year-old son Isaac died after taking part in a blackout challenge on TikTok, believes the PM's social media ban is about control, not protecting children.

@JuliaHB1

[Bernie @Artemisfornow]

Remember this … Labour doesn’t have enough money for defence

But has spent £20 BILLION of taxpayers money on foreign aid of which £5-6 BILLION is for climate aid projects.

Happy to pretend to save the planet and happy to pretend British citizens are defended 🤡

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

@DrewPavlou The news orgs that say this instead of caring about innocent people being beheaded in the streets are scum of the Earth

[X Freeze @XFreeze]

The media has stretched "far-right extremism" so far that it now covers almost anything they disagree with

They’ve changed the definition. It used to mean neo-Nazis. Now it means parents at school boards, people who want secure borders, or anyone who rejects modern progressive orthodoxy

Real far-right extremism... the violent, fringe kind....is extremely rare. But the media inflates the term so aggressively that actual extremism gets buried under mountains of propaganda labeling normal opinions as dangerous

This isn’t sloppy journalism. It’s a deliberate strategy: expand the definition of "extremist" until half the population is in the category. Then you can justify censorship, deplatforming, and social punishment while turning people against each other

[Sarah Pochin MP @SarahForRuncorn]

This morning in Parliament, I was accosted by Lib Dem MP Angus MacDonald, who accused me and others of inciting violence. His aggressive approach and tone left me feeling threatened and shaken.

This kind of behaviour is unacceptable, especially from fellow MPs. We all have different views and should be able to disagree respectfully.

The Lib Dems support open borders, while Reform UK supports controlled immigration and putting the British people first.

That’s not inciting violence, that’s doing what’s best for the United Kingdom. 🇬🇧

[Concerned Citizen @BGatesIsaPyscho]

🚨🇬🇧 UK Two Tier Justice

In once Great Britain you can break a Women’s Police Officers Nose at an airport, and walk away a free man - but only if you’re Muslim.

If you’re a White English Man - you get 2.5 Years in jail & sentenced within a week for throwing a Traffic Cone‼️

Britain is under the Fascist dictatorship.

[Lee Harris @LeeHarris]

SUPERB! Trevor Phillip's BEAUTIFULLY exposes David Lammy and Labour's sickening hypocrisy.

He shows him the receipts of them ALL saying it's ok to feel "fury" and "anger" over George Floyd, while they criticise Farage for saying the same about Henry Nowak.

Satisfying to watch.