miss fluffy

Soon ✨

[miss fluffy @AttyTweetie]

@gRaSyAh_ sabihin nalang nag defer hehe

[miss fluffy @AttyTweetie]

and now everyone can cross check sino hindi nakapasa paglabas ng list of passers next year 😞

[Philippine Supreme Court Public Information Office @SCPh_PIO]

📢 The Office of the Bar Confidant has published the list of applicants who may take the #Bar2026 Examinations, pursuant to Rule 138, Section 5 of the Rules of Court, as amended.

To view the full list, scan the QR code or click the link: https://t.co/o1dTDfxjfr

#AweSAMbar2026
#StrivewithHopeandGrit #SuccessAchievedthroughMerit
#SupremeCourtPH

[Shin Chan @shinbardiary]

“di ko gets reaction ng bar takers”

“this is nothing new. the sc has been publishing the list”

^ i find these pipol EP@L!!!

let them feel what they feel!!! imagine having the audacity to police how BAR EXAM TAKERS react to BAR EXAM MATTERS. like... ikaw ba mag-e-exam?

[miss fluffy @AttyTweetie]

Naka download naba ang lahat ng exam? One hour left na lang mga sibs.

[miss fluffy @AttyTweetie]

@AttorneyMomster sila na mauuna mag search sa mga names natin pagdating ng results

[miss fluffy @AttyTweetie]

OMG SC posting the list of applicants who may take the 2026 BAR? 🫥

Bye sa mga gusto mag anonymous mag take ng BAR. Hindi na through email malalaman

[miss fluffy @AttyTweetie]

@jpmkqb diba? hayst.

may amendment na ginawa last year sa Rule 138, Section 5 ng ROC which is required na e publish ung list of bar exam takers moving forward. Pero pwede naman sa SC website. No need to post it every social media 😭

[miss fluffy @AttyTweetie]

@khaeen_ri Everyone can cross reference na sino sino mga hindi papasa

Anyway mat amendment na ginawa last year sa Rule 138, Section 5 ng ROC which is required na e publish ung list of bar exam takers moving forward. Follow the rule talaga si Justice Garlan

[miss fluffy @AttyTweetie]

@examinee_110726 so unfair, everyone can check sino hindi mga nakapasa because of this list pag labas ng list of passers next year

[miss fluffy @AttyTweetie]

@Dura_LexSedLex_ @SCPh_PIO Yep tapos everyone can check sino hindi nakapasa if results are out 🥴

[miss fluffy @AttyTweetie]

@lexlawviosaaa Yes

[geLAW #2026BarCoach @AgheroLabs]

The Pre-week Notes for Political Law, Labor Law, and Remedial Law have already been sent to your respective email addresses.

If you did not receive the Pre-week Notes, kindly send me an email at [email protected].

LMT will be out a day/night before the Bar Exam.

Carry on, #2026Bar!

[Yonè @Yoneelaw]

Atty. Loanzon: "Pakiramdam ko, sureball 'to, itatanong sainyo"

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. ARON AKIL y GUAMALON, G.R. No. 265570, 07 April 2025, THIRD DIVISION, Gaerlan, J

Custodial Rights of a Suspect – Out-of-Court Identification

On August 22, 2017, the motorcycle of JR Belardo was stolen near the Tupi Municipal Gym.
On September 9, 2017, police arrested Aron Akil for stealing a different motorcycle in the same municipality. The following day, police invited Belardo to the station for a "show-up," where he viewed Akil alone in a detention cell. Belardo identified Akil as the thief based on his height and the fact that police had recovered a red cap, yellow shirt, and other items matching the CCTV footage from Akil’s possession.

The Supreme Court granted the appeal and ACQUITTED Aron Akil. The Court ruled that the prosecution failed to prove Akil's guilt beyond reasonable doubt because the identification was unreliable and the confession was obtained in violation of constitutional rights.

In resolving the admissibility of and relying on out-of-court identification of suspects, courts have adopted the totality of circumstances test where they consider the following factors, viz:
(1) the witness' opportunity to view the criminal at the time of the crime;
(2) the witness' degree of attention at that time;
(3) the accuracy of any prior description given by the witness;
(4) the level of certainty demonstrated by the witness at the identification;
(5) the length of time between the crime and the identification; and,
(6) the suggestiveness of the identification procedure.

Here, Akil was presented to the victim of the carnapping incident after a lapse of 18 days and he was the only suspect presented.

[miss fluffy @AttyTweetie]

Partial List of Approved Candidates to take the 2026 Philippine Bar Examinations is out!

[miss fluffy @AttyTweetie]

@lex_do_this @atty_mdltdra Legisperit 🙏

[miss fluffy @AttyTweetie]

@mdnbuys Available pa?

[miss fluffy @AttyTweetie]

Ngayon lang mag rereview 😭

[miss fluffy @AttyTweetie]

Decided to switch to LE from Jurist 🥹