@dimipan03_02@BorisBartlog@SRamirez68083 Obv settled socieites outproduce nomads but nomandic warfare is inherently assymetrically better. You achieve more with less
@dimipan03_02@BorisBartlog@SRamirez68083 First: sometimes they could solely focus on them. I mean durning the period of the huns rome basically only did that, or in the case for the mongols it was the other way around, they had to focus on more things then settled states. The mongols example speaks to my point
Yesterday, a Romanian shepherd stumbled upon a Russian drone carrying an explosive payload that crashed into a field in Romania. This being the first drone he ever saw, the man did the sensible thing and started pulling random wires out of it until he defused it himself.
@dimipan03_02@BorisBartlog@SRamirez68083 Its because they were small, but the the annoyance they caused is asymmetrical to their size. But yea almost caught me there lol
@BorisBartlog@SRamirez68083 Yes but by appropiating nomad tactics. And its not per definition impossible ofc. Byz defeated several nomsds and rome threw back the huns. Just unlikely
@ConquistaBrah@SRamirez68083 Ur completetly wrong, feels like ur extrapolating from some game. Nomads could take massive cities. Sneedle is right, till gunpowder, anybody within reach of the steppe hid in the mountains