Auri Fomo

bro

[Auri Fomo @AuriFomo]

@jackalblackhole @Frances01896069 First you ask about "me or anyone else", now it's just "me"? Is the future of mathematics in my hands? I truly am the main character.

[Auri Fomo @AuriFomo]

@Laurence1084 @joshflynnworks @tkisrage He wouldn't be accused of either if he just had a normal reaction and welcomed unharmful scientific progress.

[Auri Fomo @AuriFomo]

@ctjlewis Because it's by far the conjecture with the most results that are conditional on it. So in some way it acts as an ad hoc hypothesis for those "theorems".

[NotinReality @other__reality]

Claude Opus 5.5 has the best visual design of any model I have tested so far

[Auri Fomo @AuriFomo]

@jackalblackhole @Frances01896069 You can just study their translation into natural language? Like, you know, any other big AI result so far?

[Auri Fomo @AuriFomo]

@joshflynnworks @tkisrage It is very much a real concept and Tao incarnated it. At least until the machines arrived...

[Auri Fomo @AuriFomo]

@joshflynnworks @tkisrage Do you think this counts as challenging his status? Tao was, for good reasons, a superstar. No current mathematician has been enjoying similar prestige since he has been around. You could say he was the king of math, if you allow me. Can you claim the same for Elias Stein?

[Auri Fomo @AuriFomo]

@joshflynnworks @tkisrage Can you stop taking his past declarations for absolute truth? Do you trust politicians just as much?

Tao like anybody else has his own agenda. If you want to argue he was really challenged in the past, tell me by whom. I want names, because I can think of none.

[Auri Fomo @AuriFomo]

@joshflynnworks @tkisrage The point is: when you are at the top of the food chain and nothing threatens your status, you don't have to be vicious (some people choose to, but it is not a necessity). For the first time he is feeling challenged and his true face is showing.

[Timothy Gowers @wtgowers @wtgowers]

Martin Hairer, one of the other members of AGMAI (the advisory group on mathematics and AI), has written a post on the Proofs and Prompts blog that will I hope clarify what our purpose is. The rest of the blog is highly recommended too.

https://t.co/mhT7jaS82i

[Pedro Domingos @pmddomingos]

.@SciAm is no longer a serious publication.

[Auri Fomo @AuriFomo]

@samuhyu @jamesmith83 Such a smart reply, you really got me there

[Auri Fomo @AuriFomo]

@joshflynnworks @tkisrage Yes. A truly humble person does not throw a tantrum when he gets surpassed, by either a human or a machine. He enjoyed his position at the top of the mathematical community and now he feels in danger.

[Auri Fomo @AuriFomo]

@jamesmith83 @samuhyu Not sure if you're retarded or just pretending but I'll answer anyway. Prestige is like health. You can be the healthiest person in the world in your 20s but if you get a disease suddenly you're not healthy anymore and no amount of past health you enjoyed can change that.

[Auri Fomo @AuriFomo]

@samuhyu As I said, you can't accumulate prestige the same way you can with money. If AI solves math tomorrow, he becomes a nobody overnight and can only relive the old highs in his head.

[Auri Fomo @AuriFomo]

@samuhyu There is no such thing as "maxxing out on prestige", prestige is renewed everyday. You can't store prestige for when you become a nobody. Agree that he hasn't cared about maxxing money that much but still enjoys a very comfortable life.

[Auri Fomo @AuriFomo]

@joshflynnworks @tkisrage Look up 'false humilty'.

[Martin Bauer @martinmbauer]

No, they didn’t ’dodge the question’

The Navier Stokes problem concerns the solution of a system of differential equations with or without external forces. Openai solved the case with such a force.

Saying that OpenAI dodged the problem by solving it only when an external force is present is like saying that showing electromagnetic waves are solutions of Maxwell’s equations in a vacuum dodges the challenge to solve them, because no charges or currents are present