@FergiesRightRef In short city won't lose, unless the UK government is willing to lose the 30 billion investment from the UAE to British companies to uphold football integrity.
@TheTransferOne Bro just think abit City's defense argues that if the Abu Dhabi government moved money, they did it as an independent entity providing financial assistance to local brands like Etihad Airways to help them fulfill their global advertising commitments.
@UTD_Louie Ur dense mate,City's defense argues that if the Abu Dhabi government moved money, they did it as an independent entity providing financial assistance to local brands like Etihad Airways to help them fulfill their global advertising commitments.
@NopeagainUTD@TheTransferOne City claims they have bank statements showing the funding came from an independent state bodyโthe Abu Dhabi Crown Prince Court (CPC)โwhich provided "financial assistance" to local sponsors to help them meet their liabilities.
@XPhodler@TheTransferOne What,city are saying the received grants,pl are saying they goat money from the owner himself,๐๐whole case is nothing,city will be acquitted
@Damianrod1984@TheTransferOne Panel dismissed it due to them assuming that sheikh Mansoor's ownership of ADUG nulifies that the money came from the government that sheikh Mansoor is also apart of.loophole in the laws will get city acquitted