Darpan G

Storyteller. Only one bestseller. Blamed to be a feminist. Dog Daddy. Cow & Bull Worshipper. Open to debates. Knows LAW well. Can be insulting, when triggered.

[Darpan G @AuthorDarpan]

@CreditMantri
The most useless and irritating financial firm ever. Contacted you almost a decade ago. You turned out to be useless. I didn’t go for your services. Now your AI model callers keep calling. @TRAI any ways to stop this non-sense.

[Darpan G @AuthorDarpan]

@makemytripcare Have messaged the details in DM.

[Darpan G @AuthorDarpan]

@makemytripcare @MakeMyTripIndia
Trying to get something resolved for a booking. Your customer care moved to AI assistant, and ends up hanging up. Can I get some real assistance? Regarding flight booking.

[Darpan G @AuthorDarpan]

@getsimpl
I am constantly facing issue in making the payment. Your chat bot is of no help, neither I have your customer care mail ID.

In this scenario, if there is delay in payment. I won’t be liable for any penalty or interest.

And this is for official records.

[Darpan G @AuthorDarpan]

@zomato @zomatocare

Bravo. Fraud customer care.

Only delivery time changes. No customer care to talk to. Delivery partner not answering the call. Delivery partner not moving even an inch.

I wonder what law says. Have to fil a PIL for sure.

[Darpan G @AuthorDarpan]

Neither is your chat support working.

[Darpan G @AuthorDarpan]

@nobrokercom @NoBrokerCare

If you guys are facing some technical issue, at least put on the home page. Not able to use any option of contacting owner, or schedule a visit. Neither through the app, nor through the website.

[Darpan G @AuthorDarpan]

@nobrokercom @NoBrokerCare

If you guys are facing some technical issue, at least put on the home page. Not able to use any option of contacting owner, or schedule a visit. Neither through the app, nor through the website.

[Darpan G @AuthorDarpan]

If someone has the worst customer care, it is @ZeptoNow

I wish there was a reward ceremony for worst customer service grievance handling, and @ZeptoNow would have won it back to back since inception.

[Darpan G @AuthorDarpan]

@zeptocares A very nice video of the same will be made by me. With all screenshots. And it will be published across several handles. You guys need to be taught a nice lesson.

[Darpan G @AuthorDarpan]

@zeptocares Issue is not just the delay. Issue is your customer care. Not replying for 15+ minutes. In which way can you justify this???

[Darpan G @AuthorDarpan]

42 minutes to deliver. Zero customer care support. Zepto for you @aadit_palicha

[Darpan G @AuthorDarpan]

@aadit_palicha
Waiting for your senior agent to respond for the last 15 minutes. This is more than the time you say you take to deliver the order. Great going.

[Darpan G @AuthorDarpan]

@aadit_palicha
Waiting for your senior agent to respond for the last 15 minutes. This is more than the time you say you take to deliver the order. Great going.

[Darpan G @AuthorDarpan]

@aadit_palicha no response at all. Are you really serious about your customer care?

[Darpan G @AuthorDarpan]

@aadit_palicha no response at all. Are you really serious about your customer care?

[Darpan G @AuthorDarpan]

Hi @DeepikaBhardwaj
If you will check and inspect the past of this watchman, you will learn that this very watchman was misbehaving with these dogs.
Making an opinion on this small clip w/o knowing the past is exactly like making an opinion about a person based on clipped video

[Deepika Narayan Bhardwaj @DeepikaBhardwaj]

Most Street Dog Lovers are prime example of how brainwashing can make you deranged. Most of these so called protectors of the wild start valuing these dogs more than even humans. They hold humans guilty if dogs attack. Utter despicables.

[Darpan G @AuthorDarpan]

Can you tell why these dogs are attacking the watchman and not the other guy?

Check the past behaviour of this very watchman with these dogs.

Such tweets are more dangerous than the watchman who beat dogs.

[Incognito @Incognito_qfs]

Several dogs attacked a security guard who started defending himself with a stick.

A low IQ chutiya dog lover started beating the watchman over the use of stick.

Imo, these dog lovers are more dangerous than the dogs.

[Darpan G @AuthorDarpan]

Any reason why the dogs are attacking the watchman and not the other guy?

Well, a quick check in the past activities of this very watchman with these dogs will answer the question.

[THE SKIN DOCTOR @theskindoctor13]

Dogs attacked a guard, but instead of graciously offering himself as their evening snack, he dared to use a stick. Outraged by this heinous crime of self-defense, a kind dog lover rushed in, punched the guard and heroically shielded the dogs.

I think a 'Hero to Animals' award from PETA for the dog lover and one year RI for the guard would be an appropriate response to settle this issue.

[Darpan G @AuthorDarpan]

@authoramish @AnushkaSharma Sir, I also saw in a South Mouth that the female protagonist was shown travelling in a bus and was reading SITA - The Warrior of Mithila. Later it was disclosed that she a senior Police Officer. A subtle way to establish the character.

[GauNandiSewa Hospital @GauNandiSewa]

Visit https://t.co/mkFVuJru5G Restaurant to serve sumptuous food to Hindu Dharma precious Gaumata and Nandi baba at sector 62 noida.

Donate Food Atleast 😋

UPI ID: GauNandiSewa@YesBank
Axis cur A/C:920020070587138
IFSC: UTIB0000723
[email protected]

#Deepavali2024

[Amish Tripathi | Author | Broadcasting | History @authoramish]

There's a reason why many Hindu Liberals end up having strong disagreements with Elite Left-Liberal views.

Exhibit A: This editorial from Times of India Mumbai yesterday, on Hindu temples, that was just WhatsApped to me.

Indian "secular" laws state that the Govt has the right to take over and appropriate Hindu temples, but has no right to touch Muslim mosques or Christian churches. This bigoted law has been in place since British times, and has sadly been continued by Indian leaders. This editorial suggests that this open bias against Hindus is a good thing. Let's explore their 2 reasons.

1) "Private entities" should not control the Tirupati temple because it has assets of USD 36 billion. So the government has to take over. But the editorial has no problems with "private entities controlling worship places" if they happen to be Muslim or Christian. Implicit in this editorial is the opinion that only Hindus should not be trusted to run their own worship places.

Elite left-liberals freely discuss corruption by some bureaucrats and politicians. But this editorial also holds that the same bureaucrats and politicians should be trusted with running temple funds. If the size of the corpus determines whether the government should take over, then the Christian church and Muslim Waqf board are the 2nd and 3rd largest land owners in India (after the government, including railways). Using this editorial logic, should the government take over the running of all churches and waqf properties also, then?

2) The editorial makes a valid point on caste discrimination. No caste should face discrimination in entering temples, and if government control ensures that doesn't happen, it is good. Many private sadhus/gurus, such as Sadhguru and Sri Sri, are also working strongly against the caste system.
But discrimination against Dalit-convert Christians happens in Indian churches, too. Muslim women face discrimination in mosques; and also, Shias in Sunni-controlled mosques and vice-versa; and of course Ahmadis in most mosques. So, using the logic of the editorial in TOI, should the Indian Govt take over all Churches and Mosques to end internal discrimination there?

Net-net, using the very logic of the TOI Editorial, either the government should control the worship places of ALL religions or NONE. It can't be that the Elite Left-liberals use their logic only on Hindus and not on others. That is not secularism. And it is not equal and fair.

It is classic bigotry, and idol-worshippers have been facing this bigotry for many centuries.

[Darpan G @AuthorDarpan]

@AparnaKarthi Arrey yaar… :(