In as much as I wanted to believe in the government, I can't help but think that our politicians have already decided on the outcome of the impeachment, and they are now focused on the threatrics.
‘SI IMEE IS A LAW GRADUATE, DIBA?’
Inihayag ni Senator-judge Alan Peter Cayetano ang kanyang hamon sa pagganap sa impeachment trial laban kay Vice President Sara Duterte, lalo na’t kakaunti lamang sa hanay ng mga senador ang may karanasan sa larangan ng abogasya.
Kabilang sa mga nabanggit nito ay si Senator-judge Imee Marcos na tinawag nitong “law graduate.”
“I admit to you, nahihirapan po ako eh, wala si Senator Marcoleta iilan lang po kaming abogado dito – si Senator Pangilinan, Chiz. Si Imee is a law graduate, diba? Senator Pia. Bam is a second year law student and I’m encouraging him na tapusin niya tutal review na nangyayari ngayon. But It’s not easy, 24 lang kami, nabawasan na ng tatlo,” saad nito sa ikaanim na araw ng proceedings ngayong Miyerkules, July 15, 2026.
Matatandaang naging sentro ng kontrobersiya noong nakaraang halalan ang kredensyal sa pag-aaral ng batas ni Marcos, matapos magkaroon ng balita na nagtapos siya bilang cum laude sa UP College of Law Batch 1983, na itinanggi naman ng pamantansan.
PANOORIN: https://t.co/T1XZRypjPm
Due to a scheduled systems maintenance, incoming and outgoing InstaPay fund transfers will be temporarily unavailable from July 13, 2026 (Monday), 11 PM, to July 14, 2026 (Tuesday), 12 AM.
Transfers from BPI account to another BPI account will remain available.
WATCH: Cervical spine x-ray results reveal Sen. Rodante Marcoleta is suffering from “degenerative disc disease” that requires rehabilitation therapy, according to the PNP General Hospital (PNPGH).
He was also diagnosed with “mild pneumonia, according to P/LtCol Benaly Bayani, the chief of the Internal Medicine Department of the PNPGH.
Marcoleta has been confined at the PNP General Hospital since Monday, July 6, after initially complaining of chest pain and high blood pressure following his arrest over a plunder case. | via @jun_veneracion
Visit https://t.co/KqDTBMbTQD for more updates.
Overhead: Robin Padilla converted to Islam 1996 because he already had plans to become a politician & realized the untapped Muslim votes for winning. Great tactic ngl
Ang gusto ko kay Alex Eala matatas sa wikang Filipino kahit naghighschool sa Spain at kahit galing sa mayamang pamilya. Di tulad ng mga anak ng kaibigan ko akala mo iniluwal ni Peppa Pig. 😅
Binasbasan ng holy water, asin, at insenso ng mga paring kasapi ng Clergy for Good Governance ang Senate grounds laban sa "masasamang espiritu" ngayong Sabado ng umaga. | via @eon_sanchez
The #SupremeCourtPH (SC) has ruled that a husband and wife’s mutual desire to end their marriage, by itself, is not enough to prove collusion in a petition for declaration of nullity of marriage. A lack of objection is not the same as collusion.
In a Decision written by Associate Justice Maria Filomena D. Singh, the SC’s Third Division ruled that there was no collusion between the spouses in a petition to declare their marriage void. “Collusion” means that the spouses secretly agreed to fake or misrepresent facts in order to nullify their marriage.
The SC voided the marriage due to the husband’s psychological incapacity.
The wife filed the petition before the Regional Trial Court (RTC) alleging that her husband was unable to fulfill his marital duties because of continued physical, psychological, and economic abuse, which she said began even before their marriage.
When the husband did not file his answer to the petition, the RTC directed the Provincial Prosecutor to investigate possible collusion between the spouses. The Associate Provincial Prosecutor reported that there was no collusion.
During trial, the wife presented several witnesses while the husband presented none. He also did not oppose the petition.
Despite this, the RTC dismissed the case, ruling that the evidence did not sufficiently prove psychological incapacity.
The RTC pointed out that the husband’s father admitted discussing his testimony with his son, and that the husband was willing to have the marriage dissolved.
Explaining that collusion is a secret agreement to defraud or obtain something illegal, the SC noted that although the RTC observed suspicious circumstances, these did not clearly prove that the spouses conspired to fake grounds to nullify their marriage.
The SC emphasized that a mutual desire to end the marriage does not automatically mean collusion. A spouse’s agreement or lack of objection is not the same as a secret scheme to mislead the court.
Without proof that the spouses faked evidence or suppressed valid defenses, collusion cannot be established.
It added that the husband’s failure to file an answer or present evidence does not, by itself, prove collusion.
Read the full text of the Press Release at https://t.co/0mk2Ou2laL.
Read the full text of the Decision at https://t.co/Zk5zZWi2ZN.
Copying of this content is subject to the SC PIO’s Credit Attribution Policy: https://t.co/OuZxIbCoc4.
🇵🇭: Grade 8 Girl Stabs 7 Grade 5 Students in Cavite Classroom; Two Undergo Surgery
On June 16, 2026, in General Trias City, Cavite, a 14-year-old Grade 8 female student entered a Grade 5 classroom at a private school and stabbed seven pupils with a kitchen knife.
All victims survived and received immediate medical care; two required surgery due to the severity of their injuries. The attacker was taken for psychosocial evaluation, and the school shifted to online classes temporarily as authorities investigate.
Millennials, it's time to choose your midife crisis
1. Date a 23 year old
2. Quit drinking and become insufferable about it
3. Double down on drinking
4. Train for a marathon nobody asked about
5. Have a panic baby (with wife you hate)
6. "We're opening the relationship" (she bangs)
7. Get divorced
8. Get diagnosed with adult ADHD/autism
9. Niche side quests like rock climbing, hyrox, gardening, handstands