Pro King James Bible believing Ethnic-American who has real white native American roots, including Ulster-Scot and other Appalachian Kentucky settlers. Banjo on
Well I don't think ashkenazis are just the direct descendants of ancient Hebrews, but this word of wisdom applies here as it's definitely Jewish lies.
Titus 1:10-16 KJV
For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision: [11] Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre's sake. [12] One of themselves, even a prophet of their own, said, The Cretians are alway liars, evil beasts, slow bellies. [13] This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith; [14] Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth. [15] Unto the pure all things are pure: but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled. [16] They profess that they know God; but in works they deny him, being abominable, and disobedient, and unto every good work reprobate.
I have a stack of materials to recommend you. I was awakened to this reality in a systemic way, then I saw Europa the last battle and it was everything I researched all into one documentary. I think it hides some things and doesn't cover absolutely everything, but 85% of the documentary is absolutely factual.
Also Holocaust handbooks
https://t.co/EBcl8CLzKD
I also made a playlist about it on bitchute
https://t.co/nGYrkX67Hx
@BaptistCromwell This is banned everywhere, including on X, because it's all true. So I'll write it so this message can send. Separate spaces
https: // europathelastbattle . net/
@BaptistCromwell Those satanic lies about the fake Holocaust are even in his Ruckman reference Bible. Mixing evil Jew lies with the Bible isn't exactly "God's will".
He never once even said the word "Ashkenazi" or "Sephardic ". He also based much of his reasoning and doctrine about Jews on presuppositions about the Holocaust - which never happened - and Marxist judeo historic revisionism about WW2, and avoiding all the things "Jews" specifically manufactured in society like Hollywood and the music industry, yet he tried to explain those things while avoiding any explanation or understanding of the Jewish influence of things.
That's an extreme blindness and a great evil.
I would insult a Mormon, yes. Ok puritain makes sense, that's Yankee heritage American.
Catholic is New York immigrants (ew). Baptist are heritage Americans too, concentrated in the south. Orthodox is more immigrant and resisting Anglicans and Roman Catholicim is what America was founded on, so the Anglican part was also probably late stage English immigrant. So you are a mix of Yankee heritage American and Midwest immigrant.
I'm still leaning Mormon due to the trace swedish ancestry, English part may be from Mormon immigrants and the swedish may be from the swedish immigrants the Mormons got to move here early on, but they became anglicized and didn't continue to mix with swedish immigrants.
So what's the story here? By in large, this dna is very characteristically heritage American, but there's a few things that tell me something specific about the family history. I'm 50/50 on the Mormon thing, could just be from wasp family up north, the Scottish thing looks highlander I think so that's not southern at all. The Appalachian region is where all the actual early settlers went to who were of Ulster-Scot heritage, which again is lowlanders
Edit: after leaving this comment, I read that this user is located in Minnesota. Minnesota is an immigrant state, but the early Anglo families that settled there were Yankee. The only heritage Americans of the Midwest were Yankee ethnics. The rest of real america is southern ethnics and full of Ulster-Scot names and names common to the southerner
My original point stands, it's possible this person's heritage is from an insular Anglo Mormon family of New York who went to Minnesota given such a high isolation of Yankee English genes, or from a very rural and religious wasp family.
Nothing is equal. And comparing Nigeria with Britain is like comparing ants to wolves. Like it's not even close to the same civilization or people.
Something is inherently human about each, but you can zoom out enough to say everything is equal. Like, yeah a banana and a rock are both made of chemicals and atoms, they are both matter, they are both tangible objects. More things are the same between a banana and a rock than there are differences, yet they are very different.
Something is the same with all of matter, of all chemicals, of all physical reality. But it's the particularities of interactions and the balancing of reality which differentiates forms from one another, creating meaning. To just sum up reality with these universalities is to literally destroy all particularity by which meaning comes about. There is no equality, it's a lie.
Not always. There are many mestizo and indian Mexicans who don't have any Mixtec blood. There were many many tribes, including Mayan and dozens of others, many are only from tribes that fought against Aztecs and sided with Spanish. And there are many Mexicans who are 80% or more European blood, and in the upper class there are some Criollos of pure European blood too.
A few generations ago, most Mexicans associated with Hispanic identity weren't really brown Indians at all, they were castizos or Criollos, either 100% European or 75% European with fair European features, like the Hispanic part of my ancestry was. And the little Indian blood they had had zero to do with Aztecs.
Praise God and Amen. We should go back to this. What's wrong with it? If Mexicans in Mexico don't want Americans or Israelis or Afghanis shopping in their own store or something, who cares? It's called freedom of association, if I own an ice cream shop or something, I should be able to serve anyone I want to. Even if I don't want people with yellow ties in my store or people with brown baseball caps, I have the right to refuse service to anyone. Why would anyone obsess so much about what individual white people want or like or dislike or who they want to associate with? Any other racial or national group can say and do whatever they want on an individual basis, yet white people having opinions is the end of the world?
If black people want to open black business that serve blacks, they do. And they do it ALL THE TIME. Matter of fact they even all make a big deal about "black owned business", and zero people care or fight against it or pass laws against it. White people haven't even been allowed to do this in generations (Jews and Catholics passed special laws against white people's rights and called it "civil rights") , yet people still use these random pictures that Jews, Catholics, and liberals Yankees with zero contact with blacks up north took from 70 years ago to bring out more racial hatred against whites, when it's all totally ripped out of context. There is a reason they put these signs out back then, and it's still relevant to this day, they still steal from us and fight in our stores and cause public nussaince wherever they go. Mexicans not so much, but Americans should be able to refuse any foreign national or ethnic group that they want to.
Many afghans look like that. Yet they are only very very distantly related to Europeans, they are not European and none of their ancestors were in Europe, yet they are white. Same thing across the middle east im indigenous communities, across the Levant, and Samaritan Palestinians are said to have the strongest continuity with ancient Hebrews and they are very light skinned with "Caucasian" features.
There also the indigenous Berbers of North Africa, who at one point held a very important role in history, and they are very white too often with red hair.