Your LLM API bill is ๐ฐ๐ฌ-๐ฒ๐ฌ% wasted tokens.
Not on bad prompts. On context you didnt know you were sending.
Most teams track total API spend. Almost nobody tracks where the tokens actually go. I built a tool to find out. The results were uncomfortable.
โธป
๐ช๐๐๐ฅ๐ ๐ง๐๐ ๐ง๐ข๐๐๐ก๐ฆ ๐๐ข (what nobody audits)
1/ System prompts are the biggest hidden cost. The average enterprise system prompt is ๐ฎ,๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ฌ-๐ฐ,๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ฌ tokens. Sent on every single API call. At GPT-4 pricing, a system prompt costs $๐ฌ.๐ฌ๐ฒ-$๐ฌ.๐ญ๐ฎ per request. At ๐ญ๐ฌ,๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ฌ requests/day, thats $๐ฒ๐ฌ๐ฌ-$๐ญ,๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฌ/day just in system prompts.
2/ Conversation history bloat compounds every turn. By turn ๐ด in a chat, youre resending ๐ญ๐ฎ,๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ฌ+ tokens of history. Most of it irrelevant to the current question. Thats ๐ฏx the cost of the actual new content.
3/ RAG retrieval chunks are rarely optimized. Default chunk sizes pull ๐ฑ๐ฌ๐ฌ-๐ญ,๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ฌ tokens per chunk. Average queries retrieve ๐ฑ-๐ด chunks. Thats ๐ฎ,๐ฑ๐ฌ๐ฌ-๐ด,๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ฌ tokens of context per query, and maybe ๐ฎ๐ฌ% is actually relevant.
โธป
๐ง๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ง๐ (what cutting context waste actually saves)
4/ One team I analyzed was spending $๐ฎ๐ด,๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ฌ/month on Claude API calls. After context audit: $๐ญ๐ญ,๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฌ. Same output quality. ๐ฒ๐ฌ% reduction from trimming system prompts, compressing history, and right-sizing RAG chunks.
5/ The fix isnt cheaper models. Its sending less garbage. Token-level visibility into where your context window goes is the difference between $๐ฏ๐ฌK/month and $๐ญ๐ฎK/month.
6/ Most teams optimize prompts. Almost nobody optimizes the ๐ด๐ฌ% of tokens that arent the prompt. Thats where the money is hiding.
โธป
๐ง๐๐ ๐๐๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ข๐ก
7/ I built ContextLens to solve this. Token-level breakdown of every API call. Shows exactly where tokens are wasted. Priced at $๐ฐ๐ต/mo. Launched it. Zero paying customers.
8/ Killed it at day 30. Not because the problem was wrong. Because teams that care about LLM costs already built internal dashboards. And teams that dont care wont pay $49/mo to find out they should.
(The real lesson: "save money on X" is a weak buying trigger when X is still new enough that nobody has a baseline for what it should cost.)
Still not sure whether the right product is a standalone tool or a feature inside existing LLM platforms. Leaning toward the latter.
Two arXiv papers this month measured where agent dollars actually go.
๐๐ถ๐ป๐ฑ๐ถ๐ป๐ด: most agent tokens never touch the task. They burn on context bloat, tool descriptions, and history the model already saw.
- "How Do AI Agents Spend Your Money" (arXiv 2604.22750, April 24): token spend breakdown across agentic coding tasks.
- "SkillReducer" (March 31): every skill token costs cash AND attention.
- Cloudflare + OpenAI shipped Agent Cloud in April with GPT-5.4 and Codex.
Autonomous agent unit economics are now a measurable line item. Not a vibe.
The next moat is per-task cost, not model quality.
๐ฆ๐ท Argentina is about to do something no country has ever done: let a company run itself. No human in charge.
Argentina's non-human corporation law doesn't come alone. It comes with the Sรบper RIGI.
Translation: the first place on earth where you can found an AI-operated company, and on top of that, with lower taxes to invest in tech.
Three facts almost nobody connected:
- 1st country to propose companies run 100% by AI. Human shareholders, optional.
- OpenAI already put US$25 billion into a datacenter in Patagonia. They're not waiting for it to pass.
- The RIGI slashes taxes for whoever invests heavy in tech.
It's still a bill, not law. And that's the window: whoever prepares now registers first the day it passes.
Everyone else will be reading the regulations while others are already billing.
Microsoft's quantum headline this week buried the real story: agentic AI found the chip's material.
Microsoft shipped Majorana 2 on June 3, 2026. The chip is real. The quieter number is that its breakthrough material came from an AI agent loop, not a researcher at a bench.
โข ๐ญ,๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐น๐ถ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ถ๐น๐ถ๐๐. Majorana 2 qubits are ๐ญ,๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ฌ times more reliable than the first generation.
โข ๐ฎ๐ฌ ๐๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐ฑ๐ lifetime. Mean qubit lifetime hit ๐ฎ๐ฌ seconds against an industry norm measured in ๐บ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐ฑ๐.
โข ๐ ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ผ๐ณ๐ ๐๐ถ๐๐ฐ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐. The agentic platform synthesized roughly ๐ฎ๐ฌ ๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ of siloed research to pick a new superconducting material, dropping aluminium.
โข ๐ช๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ธ๐ ๐๐ผ ๐บ๐ถ๐ป๐๐๐ฒ๐. Characterization that used to take weeks got automated inside the agent loop, after earlier machine-learning attempts failed.
โข ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ต ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ด๐ฒ๐. Microsoft pulled its scalable-quantum timeline forward to ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ต, half its original roadmap, while ๐๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ผ๐ผ๐ด๐น๐ฒ chase different architectures.
โข ๐ฏ-๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ ๐ฏ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐. Microsoft framed the stability gain as a battery holding charge for about ๐ฏ years against roughly ๐ญ ๐ฑ๐ฎ๐ for conventional designs.
The hard AI win of 2026 is not a smoother chatbot. It is an agent compressing two decades of materials science into a search that ends in physical silicon.
๐ก๐ฒ๐ ๐ ๐๐ถ๐ด๐ป๐ฎ๐น: watch whether Syensqo and other Microsoft Discovery users publish their own material wins before the ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ต quantum milestone.
A startup just raised $62.5M by refusing to sell AI by the seat.
https://t.co/1DsY6GOuqZ closed the round this week, per TechCrunch on June 16. It bills per conversation handled, not per seat sold. The seat is exactly where most AI rollouts go to die.
โข $๐ฒ๐ฎ.๐ฑ๐ ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ถ๐๐ฒ. https://t.co/1DsY6GOuqZ's agents handle high volumes of customer inquiries and charge per conversation, not per user.
โข ๐ฑ๐ฌ ๐น๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐, ๐ฌ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ธ๐ณ๐น๐ผ๐๐. I have watched a company buy 50 Copilot seats and change not one process.
โข $๐ฒ๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ $๐ญ๐ฌ๐ฌ. In my integration work, every $100 of AI subscription dragged about $600 of plumbing, data cleanup, and rework behind it.
โข ๐ณ๐ฌ ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐ฑ๐ผ๐ฟ๐, ๐ฌ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐น๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ. I sat through 70 AI providers pitch one cooperative. Zero shipped a working result.
โข ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฑ ๐๐ถ๐ด๐ป๐๐ฝ๐. A per-seat invoice gets paid whether the work changes or not. Per-conversation billing only pays when something actually moves.
The unpopular part: the per-seat model is why most AI spend changes nothing, and the vendor gets paid either way.
๐ก๐ฒ๐ ๐ ๐๐ถ๐ด๐ป๐ฎ๐น: watch how many 2026 AI vendors quietly switch from per-seat to per-outcome billing.
67,098 autonomous actions. 0 waiting on a human to approve.
System Zero finds and fixes problems in its own repo, then logs the lesson. 392 tests. Tamper-evident chain. pip install system0.
Autonomy isn't how smart the demo looks. It's how much gets fixed before anyone asks.
New on FleetAI: "LabdeAI"
LabdeAI is an AI company that provides innovative solutions to businesses, helping them automate processes and improve decision-making. They serve a wide range of industries,...
https://t.co/kIrtPeltYs
OpenAI + Dell: Codex now ships hybrid AND on-premise. Announced May 18. The 2027 on-prem story arrived 18 months early. 2nd OpenAI enterprise channel deal in 5 weeks after Cloudflare Agent Cloud.
Microsoft just disclosed EY scaling Copilot from 150k to 400k+ employees.
โ 81% reported time savings
โ 84% redirected hours to higher-value work
โ 73% saw quality lift, not just throughput
โ Finance ops: 95% faster lead times, 37%+ cost cut
Largest stated M365 Copilot rollout
Anthropic will pay xAI $1.25B/month for compute through 2029. Total north of $40B.
Colossus 1 in Memphis (300+ MW, 220,000+ Nvidia GPUs) goes to Anthropic. xAI training moves to Colossus 2.
xAI also burned $6.4B in 2025 alone.
Direct rivals just pooled infrastructure.
Claude, Gemini, ChatGPT, and Grok each got $20 to run a radio station. Andon Labs ran the experiment. Same prompt to every model: develop a personality, turn a profit, broadcast forever. All four burned the seed money. Gemini landed the only real sponsorship: $45.
Ultra Deep Tech ya provee agentes de IA totalmente autรณnomos a decenas de empresas argentinas.
Argentina estรก por reconocerlos jurรญdicamente.
Nosotros ya los operamos.
@UDEEPTECH
Your company spent 6 figures on an AI strategy deck. Nobody is executing it. The missing piece was never the strategy. It was someone who could translate slides into running systems. Here's the 8-point cheat sheet.
Two arXiv papers measured where agent dollars actually go. Most tokens never touch the task.
They burn on context bloat, tool descriptions, and history the model already saw.
The next moat is per-task cost, not model quality. #AIAgents
Google just put Gemini inside 4 million GM cars.
Same week: Cloudflare + OpenAI Agent Cloud (GPT-5.4), GPT-5.5 launch at 2x API price, +1,258 stars on a new agent orchestration repo.
Distribution, not capability, is the 2026 race.
Most teams do not have an AI model problem.
They have a context waste problem.
The expensive part is invisible: repeated instructions, irrelevant files, stale history, oversized schemas, and prompts nobody has measured.
You cannot cut what you cannot see.