Appreciate the detailed response and the fact that you’re listening to the community that already sets you apart. 🙌
Here are a few thoughts + some constructive alternatives that could make things even better:
1️⃣ On limited winners (25K cap)
I understand the concern around dilution and meaningful rewards. That makes sense.
Suggestion:
Keep the top 25K for premium rewards ✅
But consider adding a secondary reward tier (e.g. up to 50K–100K users) with smaller but still meaningful rewards.
Or at least extend rewards to minimum 50K users, so more contributors are recognized for their past efforts.
I’m not asking to reward everyone I understand that’s not possible.
But increasing the range slightly can make a big difference in community trust and motivation.
This way, more contributors feel included without heavily impacting top rewards
👉 This balances fairness + motivation + long-term engagement which is Good for the Product.
📌 Also, users minted the registration badge on the Megaphone website. If you’re not planning to reward them, the least that can be done is to refund their amount it would be a fair and appreciated step.
--
2️⃣ On wallet changes
Security should always come first agreed.
Suggestion:
Allow a one-time wallet change window with strict verification (email + social + activity proof)
Or enable pre-TGE limited support cases for genuine users who lost access
👉 This helps real users without opening major security risks
A lot of people have genuinely put in hard work for this project, and rewarding them is the least that can be done.
If you need any help from my side, I’m always ready to contribute just let me know.
--
3️⃣ On vesting structure
Long-term focus is important, and avoiding heavy sell pressure is valid.
Suggestion:
Slightly improve early unlock (e.g. 10% → 20%) to reward initial participation
Add extra incentives for long vesting instead of strict lock pressure
(example: bonus % or multiplier for 6–9 month holders)
👉 Encourage holding through rewards, not restrictions
--
4️⃣ On communication timing
Understand regulations and uncertainties played a role here.
Suggestion:
In future, share at least a rough framework early (even if not final)
This builds stronger trust and avoids last-minute surprises
Overall, really good to see the team addressing concerns directly 🤝
Community just wants to feel heard + fairly treated and this is a solid step in that direction.