Ayrichu

[Ayrichu @Ayrichu]

@0Tamahawk3 @Nick3lBets @nyaraVT I don't doubt that it does. My original point is that it also excludes some cis women from the category of woman too, because "adult human female" does exclude some cis women.

Look dog, I'm really tired and bored and sick of all your various dogwhistles and repeating myself.

[Ayrichu @Ayrichu]

@0Tamahawk3 @Nick3lBets @nyaraVT Because, there are some people you would consider women, who are not female, that you would still consider women, I.E, women with swyer syndrome, or some women who literally don't have any internal or external genitalia, so they don't have the "female sex."

[Ayrichu @Ayrichu]

@dmawlf @TransRightsMFer @NFTboi19 @nyaraVT Okay, clearly you're just going to continue bringing disingenous and the answer is no, John money literally disproves your argument. Because they tried to trans that kid, and the kid wasn't trans.

I hope you have the day you deserve.

[Ayrichu @Ayrichu]

@dmawlf @TransRightsMFer @NFTboi19 @nyaraVT The case quite literally disproved the idea that parents can force their kids to be Trans. Because in that case, the kid didn't know they were born male until they found out at 13, in which they aligned with their sex assigned at birth.

[Ayrichu @Ayrichu]

@dmawlf @TransRightsMFer @NFTboi19 @nyaraVT No, it directly disproves your point. Because a person was forcibly transitioned against their will, and as it turns out. They WERENT trans. The case was done (super inhumanely), because John money thought gender was a learned trait, and he was proven wrong.

[Ayrichu @Ayrichu]

@dmawlf @TransRightsMFer @NFTboi19 @nyaraVT Are you capable of providing a valid syllogism for your argument or not? Because if you aren't there's nothing more to say.

[Ayrichu @Ayrichu]

@dmawlf @TransRightsMFer @NFTboi19 @nyaraVT Simple question, if I make legislation that bans your group of people from using a public restroom, is that harmful, yes or no?

And no, I haven't, you're just being incredible bad faith.

[Ayrichu @Ayrichu]

@dmawlf @TransRightsMFer @NFTboi19 @nyaraVT You can start by giving a valid syllogism first, because again, you're not demonstrating that is possible.

[Ayrichu @Ayrichu]

@dmawlf @TransRightsMFer @NFTboi19 @nyaraVT Unless you have evidence to the contrary, your invalid, unsound not even complete syllogism of "parents can lie to their children / influence them, conclusion parents trans their kids" is incoherent.

[Ayrichu @Ayrichu]

@dmawlf @TransRightsMFer @NFTboi19 @nyaraVT You're just wrong. like in the case of David Reimer, who literally was forced into being Trans when he wasn't, and when he learned he was born male, actually detransitioned. There's evidence that quite literally shows you can't influence someone's gender.

[Ayrichu @Ayrichu]

@dmawlf @TransRightsMFer @NFTboi19 @nyaraVT I'm genuinely not putting any emotion into the topic, I gave you 4, gave you all the bills that are negatively Demonstrably so, impacting trans people's lives and you want to play silly games like there's a discussion yo be had?

[Ayrichu @Ayrichu]

@dmawlf @TransRightsMFer @NFTboi19 @nyaraVT You know, i do agree it's a social construct and that it does have societal and parental roles in socializing it. What you still won't demonstrate is, your invalid, unsound, wrongly formatted syllogism argument that doesn't follow from the premise. Demonstrate how it follows it.

[Ayrichu @Ayrichu]

@n2qcyzg @JamesMcdan9056 @nyaraVT But tree doesn't have a definition that doesn't rely on wood, the point is, in fact, all words and definitions are made up, and simply describe how words are used, not prescribing some truth about said word.

[Ayrichu @Ayrichu]

@dmawlf @TransRightsMFer @NFTboi19 @nyaraVT No, I'm not making the claim at all, I'm asking you to prove your claim that parents do influence their kids gender, you're literally just burden shifting and it's disingenuous as fuck. There is no science that supports that claim. There's even evidence against it, per John money

[Ayrichu @Ayrichu]

@JamesMcdan9056 @n2qcyzg @nyaraVT Yes, because merriam Webster, female, 1b) having a gender identity that is opposite of male.

So yes, merriam westerns definition would affirm trans people, literally yes.

[Ayrichu @Ayrichu]

@JamesMcdan9056 @AndreaStockdal2 @nyaraVT Nope, Forrest Valkai, a biologist. Also supports trans people, as does nuerology.

And no, psychology and psychiatry are both very scientific lol.

[Ayrichu @Ayrichu]

@dmawlf @TransRightsMFer @NFTboi19 @nyaraVT It's literally not, you quite literally are making insane logical jumps.

P1. Some parents influence their kids in ways.
C. Parents are transing their kids.

That's dead ass your argument. It isn't even a valid or sound syllogism. Would you like to try again?

[Ayrichu @Ayrichu]

@owencore1494309 @nyaraVT For the same reason I would say a white woman is a woman, or an old woman is a woman. They're all types of women.

Trans women are real women, and you're just using an ad populous fallacy that isn't even true. Most people generally don't care.

[Ayrichu @Ayrichu]

@dmawlf @TransRightsMFer @NFTboi19 @nyaraVT You have 4 different topics to pick from, and you wanted specifics. You're just demonstrating you're disingenous as fuck.

[Ayrichu @Ayrichu]

@dmawlf @TransRightsMFer @NFTboi19 @nyaraVT You would have to demonstrate that parents are able to influence someone's gender identity, because the science is on the side that children are aware of their gender identity as early as 2-3 years old. That's not special pleading. You haven't wven given a valid syllogism.