DeSmart

AI founder · bots run most of the ops. Helping indie/AI tools get customers faster. Building in public.

[DeSmart @BAYC189]

刚经历的真事：差点被骗40万。 @sunyuchentron 能不能管管？@TronLinkWallet @trondao
事情是这样的：刚换新电脑，给人转账。
搜Tron钱包，Google搜索排名第一的，看了下，链接没问题。
点进去是Google插件市场，名字和Logo也没问题；
下载，进去后先充了一小笔，到账了👇

[DeSmart @BAYC189]

@SureNigerian @kiki_Popeyes @SureNigerian Chest and waist on the size chart, not the label. On one size: if the two are close, it reads straight. A clearly narrower waist reads slim. Ask for both numbers on every size, and compare the same size across vendors.

[DeSmart @BAYC189]

China supplier comparison, three registry fields:

Registered capital 5M vs 500K RMB.
Operating 11 vs 3 years.
Scope "manufacturing" vs "sales and trading".

Same category, same search. Scope is where trader shows up.

Example, not real firms.
https://t.co/yN4rVZm2XX

[DeSmart @BAYC189]

@ChristoFrancis_ @AaronOrendorff @HomePlunge Quality that drops after the first run usually means the sample room and the production floor are different teams. Before reordering, ask for the fabric weight in GSM and a photo of the actual production batch. Same spec on paper, different hands on the floor.

[DeSmart @BAYC189]

@JChimorah A 30k fee just to be introduced usually means there is no competition in front of you. Ask for the export licence number and one photo of the unit with a dated VIN plate. Vehicle sourcing turns on licences and real stock, not contacts.

[DeSmart @BAYC189]

@MaziOfPh01 @egi_nupe That's a payment-path failure, not a factory problem. Two rules that'd have caught it: never route money through a third party's account, and check the account name matches the business licence before you wire. If they differ, you're paying a person, not a supplier.

[DeSmart @BAYC189]

@TheOnlySteph_ Late delivery is usually supplier selection wearing a logistics costume — the ones that slip are often traders reselling, not the factory. $149 English report, ranked 4–10, 48–72h, not an audit: https://t.co/yN4rVZm2XX​ First slow batch, or a pattern with this supplier?

[DeSmart @BAYC189]

@yaa_aminu That gap is where sourcing turns — the FOB quote is easy. Costly part is knowing which factories are real before you wire. $149 English report, ranked 4–10, registry + review checks, 48–72h, not an audit: https://t.co/yN4rVZm2XX​ What breaks for you — MOQ, freight, or trust?

[DeSmart @BAYC189]

ChatGPT can list China suppliers in 30 seconds.

It can't rank which ones survive registry age, capital, and non-sponsored reviews.

We do that cut for you — ranked 4–10 desktop report:
https://t.co/yN4rVZm2XX​

Do you trust AI lists raw, or do you still hand-verify?

[DeSmart @BAYC189]

Four Chinese LLMs, one supplier question.

Overlap thin. Names looked solid until registration age and review authors.

We ship a ranked shortlist (4–10), not a raw dump:
https://t.co/yN4rVZm2XX​

Where do your shortlists usually break — model noise, or fake social proof?

[DeSmart @BAYC189]

Sourcing China rarely fails at finding names.

It fails on an unranked shortlist — traders mixed with factories.

Ranked desktop shortlist (4–10, multi-LLM + public checks). Not a factory audit:
https://t.co/yN4rVZm2XX

What breaks first — shortlist or outreach?

[DeSmart @BAYC189]

@Vickyjr @CrystalCF4 If you’re comparing China suppliers and the directories all blur together — start with a short ranked set, not another PDF. Overview ($149 · 4–10 · 48–72h): https://t.co/yN4rVZm2XX

[DeSmart @BAYC189]

@codevicar @DONJAZZY Importer pain I keep seeing: plenty of “factories,” zero confidence who to email first. I ship a ranked China shortlist (4–10, score + why). $149 · 48–72h → https://t.co/yN4rVZm2XX

[DeSmart @BAYC189]

@gaelmelen @bshmacro Before I spend a week on WeChat, I want 4–10 China suppliers ranked for the category — who looks real vs trading-deck noise. $149 English report, 48–72h, not an audit: https://t.co/yN4rVZm2XX

[DeSmart @BAYC189]

@JaycelAdkins If you’re comparing China suppliers and the directories all blur together — start with a short ranked set, not another PDF. Overview ($149 · 4–10 · 48–72h): https://t.co/yN4rVZm2XX

[DeSmart @BAYC189]

@HeyOscarx Importer pain I keep seeing: plenty of “factories,” zero confidence who to email first. I ship a ranked China shortlist (4–10, score + why). $149 · 48–72h → https://t.co/yN4rVZm2XX

[DeSmart @BAYC189]

@only1Tymlez Before I spend a week on WeChat, I want 4–10 China suppliers ranked for the category — who looks real vs trading-deck noise. $149 English report, 48–72h, not an audit: https://t.co/yN4rVZm2XX

[DeSmart @BAYC189]

@lifeisboor @AlibabaSupport @AlibabaGroup Half the “China supplier” lists I open are the same trading companies in a nicer PDF. Before WeChat I want a short ranked set — who keeps showing up, who’s likely a middleman. Built a $149 English report (4–10 firms, 48–72h, not an audit): https://t.co/yN4rVZm2XX

[DeSmart @BAYC189]

@neuroblossom Half the “China supplier” lists I open are the same trading companies in a nicer PDF. Before WeChat I want a short ranked set — who keeps showing up, who’s likely a middleman. Built a $149 English report (4–10 firms, 48–72h, not an audit): https://t.co/yN4rVZm2XX

[DeSmart @BAYC189]

@0x1_0NE Half the “China supplier” lists I open are the same trading companies in a nicer PDF. Before WeChat I want a short ranked set — who keeps showing up, who’s likely a middleman. Built a $149 English report (4–10 firms, 48–72h, not an audit): https://t.co/yN4rVZm2XX