Mariota has one more year left in him and Hartman ain’t it. Why not take a shot on the most important position with a 7th round pick? Who would you have taken that would have made an immediate impact? Worst case scenario we develop him and he’s a great backup or we trade him. They had him clocked through the entire process. Top 30 and interviews. If you’re surprised it means you weren’t paying attention.
@BleedinBnG@MarkBullockNFL You should also agree with the rest of @MarkBullockNFL tweet. The flexibility they ALL bring to this scheme is what’s going to improve this defense. Moving on from Luvu does not make the unit stronger. No matter who else they add.
@FlexxOnEm91@BleedinBnG Yours. Referencing picks made by the prior, incompetent front office has nothing to do with my take. You think they utilized that draft capital with no intention to let them earn a second contract? You’re genuinely confusing me…
What does CB Amik Robertson bring to the Washington Commanders?
-Fierce competitor
-Inside/outside flexibility
-Short area quickness
-Size/frame limitations
Full breakdown: https://t.co/q12LTLZ0Ym
Tired of DBs who don't tackle?
Insert: Nick Cross
The Vikings used stacked boxes on the sixth-most snaps last year
Expect to see A LOT of Cross in the box for the new #Commanders defense
#RaiseHail
@BleedinBnG Leo is versatile as well and better in coverage than Luvu. Why wouldn’t you want multiple versatile chess pieces that can line up at multiple positions on any given play. That is literally the main focus of Daronte’s scheme. What do you gain by “moving off” Luvu?