@AhmadRehanKhan Clearly, you have not read the evidence. When asked and sued, the CDC failed to provide ANY evidence for the vaccines given in the first 6 months of life.
Only the MMR has been studied for autism. The others have not.
You're out of touch with reality 'Dr'
https://t.co/vcvkg2TeOm
@drterrysimpson The FDA, in its guidance, states: “Placebos, defined as inert substances with no pharmacologic activity…” and that a “placebo control … group ... receives an inert treatment…” Or as CDC explains: “A substance or treatment that has no effect on living beings.”
@redherringdraws@drterrysimpson None of the childhood vaccines were ever tested against truly inert placebos, therefore you can not know their safety profile
Comparing against other vaccines is tobacco science.
@ArthurCaplan When the placebo contained aluminum hydroxide adjuvant, that's NOT an inert placebo that allows you to establish a proper safety profile.
Perhaps you need to relearn what placebo means.
Adjuvants are NOT inert.
Most people think FOIA requests are for journalists chasing scandals. Here's what we used them for.
The CDC's own website says it in black and white: "Vaccines do not cause autism." Mountains of science, they said. The evidence is settled, they said.
So @AaronSiriSG did something simple. He said let's FOIA for the things I'm pretty sure they don't actually have.
We asked the CDC to provide every trial they relied upon to establish that the first six vaccines given in the first six months of life do not cause autism. A year and a half of litigation (and a fortune in legal fees.) And they finally came into court and said they have no such trials. Not one for any of the six vaccines we asked about.
The mountain of science doesn't exist. It never did.
And here is the part that I think about most. I understand why this is hard to accept. You are busy. You are not a medical student. You just want to be able to hand your baby to a doctor and trust that someone has done their homework. That is a completely reasonable thing to want.
That is exactly how they got away with it for so long. We trusted and we never asked. And the moment someone finally asked, in a court of law, with the full weight of the legal system behind the question, the answer was silence.
A house of cards held up by the one thing they never expected: someone checking.
Start by watching "An Inconvenient Study." Then ask your own questions.
@p_55_022@NightShiftMD Partly because he vaccine was linked to a rare, but serious, side effect known as Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome (TTS), which involves blood clots combined with low platelet counts.
AKA CLOT SHOT.
I have been asked why I give Trump latitude on the Iranian military engagement. Here is why:
The trust is because Trump got in and got out of Iran last summer without loss of a single American life.
The trust is because he killed Solemaini and Baghdadi finishing ISIS without loss of a single American.
The trust is because he got Maduro without losing a single American.
The trust is because there are over a dozen foreign nations who said "Trump got us out of [x] war." Again, without loss of a single American.
The trust is because of the Abraham Accords.
The trust is because he got India to drop their tariffs.
The trust is because he said "F your Paris Accords" and "F trying to bribe Iran not to destroy the world."
The trust is because he made the EU start paying their share in NATO.
The trust is because he stopped contributing billions to theUkraine War.
The trust is because he brought 18 TRILLION in foreign investment in one year compared to Biden bringing 1 trillion in four years.
The trust is because he made Americans proud to join the military and serve.
The trust is because reinvigorated a healthy sense of nationalism in a way we haven't seen in decades.
The list goes on and on.
After all these wins, in year 6 of him serving as our Commander In Chief, this is the very first time that he has come out and said "this is important enough that we need to risk American lives and unfortunately some may die."
He has never done that before.
We cannot have access to the classified Intel he has. Obviously. And as a general rule, I assume that my government is lying to me and paid by the military industrial complex to sell me on war.
But with all of his blood-free international wins, this is the guy I trust when he says the Intel dictates we make this move now.
That trust is not forever. It's a pretty short leash by military engagement standards. I pray we don't see American boots on the ground inside Iran and that we see no more American deaths. I also recognize that it's political suicide to go into election season this summer in a hot war. This better be a distant memory in the fall.
But if anybody has earned our trust by proving that he gets win after win internationally while being exceedingly prudent in risking American lives, President Donald Trump is that man.
@AnnieAndrewsMD Would love to see Dr Annie last 5 mins in a debate with RFK.
How about seeing how long Dr Annie would last in court against RFK?
Her comment is kinda childish,especially considering she probably studied very little about nutrition in med school.
What a hypocrite
@Landers2026@DJSpeicher Really?
Please show us ANY safety studies on injecting humans with nanoparticle aluminum salts?
Retrospective epidemiological studies don't prove safety, btw.
@DJSpeicher When they can not argue logically, they get emotional. Cognitive Dissonance on full display.
Notice that when pressed, the doctor fails to give any logical or academic argument. He plays the victim and claims to be attacked.
JB Handley (audience guy) makes him look like a fool.