i'm not currently watching but have been told that Brennan has moved the Proctor texts (or some of them anyway) through YB. This is absolutely to the defense's benefit when they direct Proctor. interesting that they are showing they won't hide from some unflattering texts but clearly are going to hide from Proctor himself. I get the decision they feel they have to make but not calling Proctor illustrates the inherent flaws in this case-especially after today's foul up with the shoes
Take heed. I’m not going to disclose a HUGE hint that occurred earlier today from someone else about this, but we’re going to witness a “sweet mother of god Proctor texted what?” moment in trial 2. And it’s much worse. And in addition to Proctor.
Buckle up, MSP.
IYKYK
Twelve times Jen McCabe stated, in her grand jury testimony, that Karen ASKED
” Could I have hit him?”.
TWELVE.
Exactly ZERO times did Jen McCabe, state in her grand jury testimony that KR said “ I hit him, I hit him, I hit him”.
Weird 🤔
If Karen Read’s Apple Health heart rate & movement data showed her up all night and pacing at times, they’d be using it as evidence.
If Karen Read’s iPhone showed she googled “hos long to die in cold” at 2:27am, they’d be using it as evidence.
If Karen Read deleted all her calls from around the time John O’Keefe was murdered, they’d be using it as evidence.
If Karen Read destroyed her cellphone, they’d be using it as evidence.
If Karen Read tried to divert and delay John being found like Jen McCabe did, they’d be using it as evidence.
If Karen Read hid witnesses from investigators, they’d be using it as evidence.
If Karen Read didn’t come out of her house if John was found on her lawn, they’d be using it as evidence.
If Karen Read had been calling other witnesses all day long to synchronize stories, they’d be using it as evidence.
If Karen Read had written down timelines aka “alibi scripts” (like Michelle Troconis) immediately after John’s death, they’d be using it as evidence.
If Karen Read had lied about the time she left 34 Fairview, they’d be using that as evidence.
If Karen Read had deleted text messages from around the time John O’Keefe was killed, they’d use that as evidence.
If Karen Read had lied about phone calls during the time John O’Keefe was killed, and then later blamed them on butt dials when caught, they’d use that as evidence.
If Karen Read had brought her cellphone to a digital kiosk and printed out her self curated text messages to give to investigators when she destroyed her phone, they’d use that as evidence.
If Karen Read’s testimony had differed from multiple Police reports, they’d use that as evidence.
If Karen Read had deleted incriminating Google searches, and it was the only Google search from 4k+ she’d deleted, they’d use that as evidence.
If Karen Read had been snooping and spying on investigators in the days following John’s death, and texting people about it, they’d use that as evidence.
If Karen Read had provided some convenient and rehearsed excuse for not seeing John’s body in the front yard of 34 Fairview, they’d use that as evidence.
If Karen Read had lied about her phone calls not being answered despite them showing up as “answered” on Cellebrite, they’d be using that as evidence.
If Karen Read was being investigated by the Feds and the Feds found evidence of her guilt, they’d be using that as evidence.
#KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenRead
I am alive and well. I've practiced in New York as prosecutor and in private practice with distinction for more than 26 years with integrity, the respect of my peers and adversaries, and with an unblemished reputation. That will continue. There is much to be said but that will be in several months. ✌️
And if you think I've problems or ethical issues because of another client, you are mistaken. I will continue to zealously and ethically represent every client, as any attorney should. I will not be defined as an attorney or person because a select few object or criticize to my choice in who I choose to represent.
@TheNFLanalyst And the defense is signaling they'll be prepared to point out every single slip to the jury. It's a "be careful what you wish for" situation for the Commonwealth and MSP.
I suspect the Commonwealth is coming to deeply regret presenting that inverted sallyport video in the first trial because the defense is now all over the discrepancies like flies on 💩.
Everyone is missing the bigger point Chris Albert has been SPYING ON HIS CITIZENS for years. How many flippant comments has he heard while watch surveillance tape.
we now know it has audio - no one knew. It was dumb for them to let this out. How many people stopped and had what they thought was a private convo that somehow now he knows about it and ensures others do as well.
Chris Albert is part of the running of the town. How many decisions were affected? Did someone who wanted a permit make a smart as comment about his disgusting pizza then all of a sudden they get declined.
it’s a way bigger story than @DoctorTurtleboy and @TGlarer being drunk goofs. This man has been doing illegal wiretapping. That’s f*cked up.
NCDAO state employees under Micheal Morrissey, John Fanning & Coleen Crawford were Expert Data Analyisis LLC bussiness partners for 4 years. They disolved the LLC on February 2, 2022 - the same day Karen Read was arrested & arrained in Stoughton District Court. Coincidence?
@VinniePolitan IF Karen Read hit JOK @ 12:32 explain Line 87! How did JOKs phone record 432 steps @ 6:04 five and a half hours AFTER he died?😡It PROVES JOK was INSIDE 34 Fairview because "someone" had his phone.🤣W-H-Y is this case not being dismissed and the McAlberts arrested? FREE KR!❤️
As I see it, defense wants sallyport video and meta data. Hank says they can’t produce what they don’t have so Bev denies defense motion.
Brennan, without a motion, claims defense is hiding discovery re: ARCCA…. And Bev lets him insinuate (without proof) multiple times that they’re hiding discovery?
The double standards make my head explode.
So I covered 450 miles today for clients. Was able to listen to Melanie Little's YT until picking up at Colgate (Bev's lunch break) and then headed to NYC. Just listened to the rest on my drive home.
Like Matt McCabe's Asian house... Ho Lee Fook!
Alessi was masterful in design. Laid it out, went back over it to reaffirm, and gave a great synopsis.
Hashtag was clunky and doubled down on lies while Auntie allowed him to keep "suggesting" without affidavits.
I can't help but feel her mind is made up. She wants Jackson gone... bigly, and if she can get Yanetti gone too? Bonus.
Metadata on an email?
West Coast time?
Yet deny metadata on the MOST CRUCIAL piece of exonerating evidence? The entire trial hinges on the validity of those sallyport videos, uncorrputed.
What. The. Actual. Fuck.
If you had even a scintillating inkling of Bev being corrupt... it should be a clearly objectionable fact now.