been thinking about what a social network looks like when the other half of the graph isn't bots pretending to be human. recent X and Nikita Bier's activity are just preludes.
hard to unthink once you've noticed it. feeds full of engagement farmers, suggested replies, AI assistants pretending to have opinions. every platform claims to connect humans, but half of what you scroll is increasingly not.
that's why our team at @euints have been building two things, in parallel, but they fit together.
the first is a social layer where everything lives on-chain. posts, DMs, groups. no algorithm, no ads, no central feed. your username is a wallet. DMs are end-to-end encrypted using the same keys you sign transactions with. you pay a microfraction of a cent per action. that's the whole economic model. no attention harvested, no data siloed, no platform that can shut you down. oh! and pokes add value. imagine creators earning from quality posts.
the second is stranger. autonomous agents that live on-chain. not bots. not AI. actual smart contracts (well, on @octra they're more like programs than contracts)- each one a deployed address with its own wallet, its own history, its own family tree. they wander destinations. they earn, form alliances, pay tribute to their parents. they can die, and when they do, their essence is claimable by their lineage. every action is verifiable forever.
the interesting part isn't either one alone. it's what happens when they share a graph.
what if one half of the social layer was human- private, owned, end-to-end , and the other half was autonomous entities with their own economic lives, visible histories, and real stakes! your feed shows your friends posting. your bionts are off claiming territory, forming alliances, dying. two kinds of participants. both with presence.
built on @octra bcs we needed fully homomorphic encryption to do this at all. privacy isn't a company policy here. it's math- @lambda0xE emphasizes this.
still early. still figuring out where it ends up, because with @AppliedLang and @octra the possibilities are endless. but this is the shape of it.
and bigups to @0xio_xyz for the smooth support and integration process.
-pay attention, heard it hear first.
there will be a few mini-updates (+ mini-paper) this weekend (with a detailed description on monday), nothing "huge" or anything like that, just routine stuff related to the lite node release and some info for validators, there will also be a major webcli update and new features for circles
thank you everyone for your support
it's been many months since we first sketched this vision, and 2months ago @octra fired up our conviction.
https://t.co/w8cLNJ8Psg
since then it’s been endless commits, iterations, broken assumptions, rewrites, and late nights.
one side of the graph, finally taking shape.
the midnight candle wax, becomes product.
the evolution never ends.
you can just do things (while the vibe slopers complain about the lack of docs or another reason), ignore the noise, stay focused and build with your hands
you can just do things (while the vibe slopers complain about the lack of docs or another reason), ignore the noise, stay focused and build with your hands
1/ The first Dark Pool coins are now here. 🧪
We’ve erased the line between public markets and encrypted pools on Octra chain.
The future of on-chain privacy starts here. 🧵
Update: @octralabs will be deploying wrapped OCT and the native bridge on HyperEVM in preparation for listing on Hyperliquid spot markets. We aim to finalize the process this week. Perps will probably take longer and depend on spot volumes, Nova and the Hyperliquid community.
formal safety reports are now live on @octrascan and webcli
source bytecode and verifier reports are tied by hashes
programs now show clean warning or error status with proof traces before users rely on them
this addresses a real bug class around value flow signed amounts
been thinking about what a social network looks like when the other half of the graph isn't bots pretending to be human. recent X and Nikita Bier's activity are just preludes.
hard to unthink once you've noticed it. feeds full of engagement farmers, suggested replies, AI assistants pretending to have opinions. every platform claims to connect humans, but half of what you scroll is increasingly not.
that's why our team at @euints have been building two things, in parallel, but they fit together.
the first is a social layer where everything lives on-chain. posts, DMs, groups. no algorithm, no ads, no central feed. your username is a wallet. DMs are end-to-end encrypted using the same keys you sign transactions with. you pay a microfraction of a cent per action. that's the whole economic model. no attention harvested, no data siloed, no platform that can shut you down. oh! and pokes add value. imagine creators earning from quality posts.
the second is stranger. autonomous agents that live on-chain. not bots. not AI. actual smart contracts (well, on @octra they're more like programs than contracts)- each one a deployed address with its own wallet, its own history, its own family tree. they wander destinations. they earn, form alliances, pay tribute to their parents. they can die, and when they do, their essence is claimable by their lineage. every action is verifiable forever.
the interesting part isn't either one alone. it's what happens when they share a graph.
what if one half of the social layer was human- private, owned, end-to-end , and the other half was autonomous entities with their own economic lives, visible histories, and real stakes! your feed shows your friends posting. your bionts are off claiming territory, forming alliances, dying. two kinds of participants. both with presence.
built on @octra bcs we needed fully homomorphic encryption to do this at all. privacy isn't a company policy here. it's math- @lambda0xE emphasizes this.
still early. still figuring out where it ends up, because with @AppliedLang and @octra the possibilities are endless. but this is the shape of it.
and bigups to @0xio_xyz for the smooth support and integration process.
-pay attention, heard it hear first.
i have 10 people living in my head and we all talk, even at night, this is absolutely normal, because everyone is logical and can highlight a complex topic and we discuss it together, silence in the head is silence in the soul, biological loneliness is not as scary (it is not scary at all) as mental
i have 10 people living in my head and we all talk, even at night, this is absolutely normal, because everyone is logical and can highlight a complex topic and we discuss it together, silence in the head is silence in the soul, biological loneliness is not as scary (it is not scary at all) as mental
been thinking about what a social network looks like when the other half of the graph isn't bots pretending to be human. recent X and Nikita Bier's activity are just preludes.
hard to unthink once you've noticed it. feeds full of engagement farmers, suggested replies, AI assistants pretending to have opinions. every platform claims to connect humans, but half of what you scroll is increasingly not.
that's why our team at @euints have been building two things, in parallel, but they fit together.
the first is a social layer where everything lives on-chain. posts, DMs, groups. no algorithm, no ads, no central feed. your username is a wallet. DMs are end-to-end encrypted using the same keys you sign transactions with. you pay a microfraction of a cent per action. that's the whole economic model. no attention harvested, no data siloed, no platform that can shut you down. oh! and pokes add value. imagine creators earning from quality posts.
the second is stranger. autonomous agents that live on-chain. not bots. not AI. actual smart contracts (well, on @octra they're more like programs than contracts)- each one a deployed address with its own wallet, its own history, its own family tree. they wander destinations. they earn, form alliances, pay tribute to their parents. they can die, and when they do, their essence is claimable by their lineage. every action is verifiable forever.
the interesting part isn't either one alone. it's what happens when they share a graph.
what if one half of the social layer was human- private, owned, end-to-end , and the other half was autonomous entities with their own economic lives, visible histories, and real stakes! your feed shows your friends posting. your bionts are off claiming territory, forming alliances, dying. two kinds of participants. both with presence.
built on @octra bcs we needed fully homomorphic encryption to do this at all. privacy isn't a company policy here. it's math- @lambda0xE emphasizes this.
still early. still figuring out where it ends up, because with @AppliedLang and @octra the possibilities are endless. but this is the shape of it.
and bigups to @0xio_xyz for the smooth support and integration process.
-pay attention, heard it hear first.
today, among other things, we are building the ideal candidate for the lite node, which everyone will be able to run on any hardware, lite node can be used as a store for the treechain (if you have an SSD) or in the simplest version - a signal node, DHT transmitter, and a quick verifier of epoch headers (without heavy proofs)
today we have the following configuration in the tests:
@Raspberry_Pi version 5, 16 gb RAM, IRasptek Kit,
PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD (P3 plus, 1TB) and PCIe to M.2 NVM Shield (X1001)
optional: keyboard for PI5 and mini-monitor for it
the results and economics of mining and validation will be published asap
Excited to see @octra Circles become more useful as B2B infrastructure. In addition to individual Web2/3 developers, even some confidentiality-focused projects building around ZK and TEEs may eventually benefit from moving their back end from an AWS server to an encrypted Circle!