@UlisesDavid__ Covering your mouth rule is stupid anyway, but also he did it for about a second in the clip, and it looked more like blowing a kiss than covering his mouth while talking, also that hit his shoulder and upper arm, not the hand, you can see that in the fucking photo mate.
@_lamineyamal1_ Now look at what the cards were awarded for, Argentina also had a ton of rough housing not awarded as fouls, like elbowing players in the back or hitting them in the back of the head. No fouls were recorded for those. So severity of fouls matters, and not all fouls were recorded.
@Selene_Mariposa You only need a license for live broadcasts. I have a TV I use for DVDs and games not BBC or live broadcasts, so i dont need a license
@GlobalFC5@bondseven1 It wasnt a red, it was a second yellow which makes it a red. Its a completely fair yellow card as it was a reckless attempt, didn't get the ball, and endangered another player.
@ProfessorLycan@Caff2ine_@nessejesse@pureMetatron Age of heroes is the English translation of a Greek term. The bronze age is the English term. Its like how a German idiom translated into English is still a German idiom we may not understand.
@CCoderDyne@pureMetatron The English language came much later. The bronze age is the age of heroes (which is a rough translation of what the greeks called it) the problem is that an American audience would not corrolate the age of heroes to the bronze age, as such not understanding Nolans meaning.
@ProfessorLycan@Caff2ine_@nessejesse@pureMetatron The age of heroes is the bronze age... they are (somewhat) the same time period, ending at the same time. Nolan just used the language the English speaking world would recognise. Because most people wouldn't know what the extent of the age of heroes was.
@ProfessorLycan@Caff2ine_@nessejesse@pureMetatron Mate, the point is an English term was not around in Ancient Greece because the English language wasn't. Of course they had their own words for the era they saw themselves within.
@honorablesaint Thats why Argentine players were throwing punches and doing seatbelt tackles? Of course they aren't thugs, its methodical, its still crappy sportsmanship. Its pushing the line on what is cardable, and trying to instigate the opponents into fouling back, which is when they dive.
@grluci I am happy Argentina lost not because the "Fifa rigs it" argument but because Argentina have had the dirtiest and most brutal fouls out of every team I have seen in this world cup, they were brutal against both England and Spain. Thats why I was rooting for spain to win.
@Rheamund_ The main con is the kickoff times, England vs Mexico was at 2am. And it is represented in the final viewership, as it had under 1 billion viewers, while Qatar had around 1.5 billion viewers.
@KeikiDaChocoLab@Rheamund_ By what metric was it the Greatest World Cup, compared to the last few Cups it had a very low viewership, with the final having under 1 billion viewers, compared to last year at around 1.5 billion.
@kangminlee Well in my case I am English, they knocked England out of the World cup and they were fouling left and right, so of course I would support Spain against a team I view as playing dirty.
What the fuck is Trump doing? The trophy lift is for the winning team, get out of the way. Even Infantino tried to drag him out the shot but his head is so massive it would hurt his ego too much to let a team celebrate his victory without him being in the shot.